Elsevier

Biosystems Engineering

Volume 181, May 2019, Pages 52-62
Biosystems Engineering

Research Paper
A new ventilation system to reduce temperature fluctuations in laying hen housing in continental climate

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.02.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Evaporative cooling pads of new ventilation system were installed in commercial house.

  • The new ventilation system provided a cooler air environment than the traditional system.

  • The new ventilation (NV) system reduced temperature-humidity heat stress index values.

  • Egg production was higher in the NV house than in the traditional system (TV) house.

  • The mean bird mass was 21 g higher in the NV house than in the TV house.

Poultry suffer from large temperature variations with traditional tunnel ventilation and wet-pad evaporative cooling (TV) system in continental climates, which negatively influences production performance, resulting in significant economic losses. An ideal ventilation system is desired for retrofitted and new poultry houses. A new ventilation (NV) system was designed to mitigate the air temperature variations and improve the uniformity in poultry houses located in continental climate regions. The evaporative cooling pads were installed on both sidewalls and exhaust fans were located on a gable wall in the NV system. The system could be operated in different modes for daytime and night time by automatically running or not running evaporative cooling according to indoor set-point temperature. The performance of the NV system was evaluated in comparison with a TV system by measuring the thermal environment and layer performance of two commercial poultry houses with different ventilation systems. The results showed that the NV system provided a cooler air environment than the TV system, and the maximum fluctuation in average air temperature was reduced to 1 °C vs. 6.1 °C in TV system. Based on temperature-humidity heat stress index (THI) values, compared to the TV system, the NV system reduced heat stress time across the building in horizontal and vertical planes. The egg production was higher in the NV system house than in the TV system house (20.3% vs 18.9%), and the mean bird's mass in NV system house was 21 g higher than in TV system house.

Introduction

Modern confined laying hen houses in continental climates are typically equipped with tunnel ventilation and wet-pad evaporative cooling (TV) system. In summer, the most common ventilation practice is to run the TV system, in which cooling pads are installed on the gable wall or/and both sidewalls in one end of the building, while fans are installed in the other end (Hui et al., 2016). However, several studies have been carried out and concluded that laying hen houses equipped with TV systems have the drawbacks of cold or heat stress, large diurnal temperature variations and non-uniform airflow distribution under continental climate conditions (Cao et al., 2014, Olgun et al., 2007, Ruzal et al., 2011). Temperature is commonly assumed to be the most important environmental factor influencing poultry health, behaviour and production (Webster & Czarick, 2000), also the feed intake of hens which could affect egg size (Wang, Zheng, Qin, & Li, 2018). Continental climates are characterised by large temperature differences between daytime and night time, large differences between wet and dry bulb temperatures and hot and dry weather in the summer (Olgun et al., 2007). During the daytime in continental climates, the TV system helps to lower the indoor temperature to the required set-point but can cause big temperature variations and non-uniformity of air distribution in the poultry houses, resulting in cold stress for the birds near the pads or heat stress for the birds near the fans (Cao et al., 2014, Webster and Czarick, 2000). During the night, the baffle inlets in side walls are operated instead of the cooling pads to minimise the temperature gradation.

The TV system could cause a great range of amplitude variations in air temperature and humidity between the two ends of poultry houses in continental climates. In one study, when the indoor temperature reached the required set-point in day time, the ventilation rate would greatly decrease or the water pump would be shut off, which caused a considerable air temperature variation between the two ends of the poultry house (Teitel et al., 2008). When the outdoor air temperature fell rapidly at night time, the ventilation rate was dramatically reduced, which could also cause big temperature differences between the inlet and exhaust ends of the poultry houses. Evidentially, the layer hens in such a TV system could suffer from cold-stress near the cooling pads and heat-stress near the fans.

Large temperature variations and non-uniform air distribution usually negatively affect the birds' health and their production performance, resulting in different levels of feed intake, feed consumption, layer mass, and egg mass which are not acceptable on the market (Abbas et al., 2011, Czarick and Lacy, 1993, Dawkins et al., 2004, Kocaman et al., 2006, Webster and Czarick, 2000, Yahav et al., 2000). In extreme conditions, large temperature variations may also lead to excessive mortality of layers, consequently, reducing the farmer's profits (Feizil et al., 2012, İsmail and Kamanlı, 2015). Abbas et al. (2011) carried out experiments to observe the effects of fluctuating ambient temperature and humidity on the performance of layers, and revealed that birds located at the center of the house, where the temperature ranged 14–28 °C and relative humidity 22%–90%, exhibited better performance than in the other two locations, where temperature ranges were 18–30 °C and 20–32 °C, respectively, and relative humidity of 30%–80% and 34%–84%, respectively. As conclusion, the large fluctuations of air temperature inside the confined poultry houses would affect the performance of laying hens. Heat stress has negative effects on feed consumption, feed efficiency and egg production of layers (Kocaman et al., 2006). Hens consume more feed to maintain their body heat when they suffered cold stress (Wang, Zheng, Shi, & Li, 2018). Webster and Czarick (2000) reported that excessive variations of temperature in different places within the closed layers house would lead to marked variation in feed consumption, and layers would consume lesser or greater amounts of nutrients than required, and resulting in large variations in egg sizes. Also, the great fluctuations temperature during cold weather may lead to poor feed conversion ratio and to health problems (Czarick & Lacy, 1993). The uniformity of hygro–thermal parameters was one of the key factors affecting poultry health and increasing the bird mortality (Webster & Czarick, 2000).

Numerous studies about alternative cooling methods of laying hens had been conducted to mitigate heat stress, such as use of intermittent partial surface sprinkling, misting or fogging (Chepete & Xin, 2000). Intermittent partial surface sprinkling had the following merits: lower body temperature rise, higher lethal heat load threshold, longer survival time, and reduced mortality (Ikeguchi, 2001). But Timmons, Baughman, and Murray (1983) suggested that misting systems should be designed to promote the wetting of the bird occupied zones instead of attempting to mist the air of the entire house. The use of misting and sprinkling systems has the problem of wet litter, equipment, and feed. Therefore, an ideal ventilation system is desired for the continental climate to mitigate the large air temperature variations and provide an uniform indoor environment for laying hens.

The objectives of this study were to design a new ventilation (NV) system based on the limited sticking jet principle (Kostel, 1995) and to evaluate its effects on reducing heat stress, mitigating the air temperature differences of laying hen houses during the summer of a continental climate.

Section snippets

Design of the new ventilation system

A better ventilation control method is required to ensure a more comfortable and uniform thermal environment. The environment control provided by the ventilation system should be determined by the ambient environment desired for poultry health. Kocaman et al. (2006) reported poultry had better egg production and feed conversion ratios under suitable environmental conditions and gave recommended temperature and relative humidity values of 18–28 °C and 60%–70% for cage layer houses. Effective

Experimental poultry houses

Two adjacent commercial layer houses (A and B) separated by a distance of 20 m from each other and located at Fukang city, Xinjiang, Northwest of China were used for the experiment. The house (Fig. 2) orientated in a North-South direction. The two poultry houses were each 96 × 11.5 m (length × width), with a side-wall height of 3 m and maximum distance from the floor to the roof of 4.35 m. Each house contained four rows of cages with three stair-step tiers. At the beginning of the experiments,

Outdoor air temperature and relative humidity

Figure 4 shows the variation of outdoor air temperature and relative humidity for 34 consecutive days (from 11th August, 2016 to 13th September, 2016). It appears that the outdoor air temperature and relative humidity varies between 28.7 and 37.8 °C, 40.4% and 51.5%, respectively. Figure 5 presents variations of the outdoor air temperature and relative humidity on the selected extreme condition day (24th August, 2016). The air temperature and relative humidity ranged from 20.8 to 41.2 °C and

Conclusion

In this study carried out over one summer month in a zone with a continental climate, characterised by hot dry summers and sudden temperature changes between day time and night time, the NV system was much more effective than the TV system. It could provide uniform cooling air distribution and mitigate the large air temperature variations compared to the TV system. In this study, the air temperature variations in the NV system were reduced compared to the TV system, and the maximum fluctuation

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof Brian He of the University of Idaho for providing a useful revision of the article. The Staff of the laying hen farm are appreciated for their assistance with data collection. The author would also like to thank Fu Kang Yuan Poultry Co. Ltd., Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. The funding of this work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0500700) and the China Agricultural Research System (CARS-40).

References (29)

  • M. Czarick et al.

    Maintaining a consistent house temperature during cold weather

    Cooperative Extension Service, The University of Georgia

    (1993)
  • M.S. Dawkins et al.

    Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density

    Nature

    (2004)
  • A. Feizil et al.

    Effect of heat stress on production of Hy-line layers

    Research Journal of Biological Sciences

    (2012)
  • R.S. Gates et al.

    Regional variation in temperature humidity index for poultry housing

    Transactions of the ASAE

    (1995)
  • Cited by (17)

    • Influence of tunnel ventilation on the indoor thermal environment of a poultry building in winter

      2022, Building and Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      In summer, fresh air is drawn into the building from evaporative cooling pads and then exhausted by exhaust fans [15–17]. This will cause significant temperature gradients along the length, that is, low temperature near the evaporative cooling pads and high temperature near the exhaust fans, which has been proven in many studies and projects [18–25]. In winter, fresh air is drawn into the building from windows on the sidewalls [26], and the ventilation rate is very low [27–29].

    • Design considerations for net zero energy buildings for intensive, confined poultry production: A review of current insights, knowledge gaps, and future directions

      2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Tunnel ventilation (forced air) is a variant of negative pressure systems. In these systems, axial fans are located on one side of the barn to exhaust air while air inlets with evaporative cooling pads are used to inlet fresh air on the other side of the barn [193]. Another variant of exhaust ventilation is pit ventilation, which is commonly used in deep-pit buildings with manure storage.

    • Comparative analysis of sustainable desiccant – Evaporative based ventilation systems for a typical Qatari poultry house

      2021, Energy Conversion and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, the air temperature is cooled to its wet bulb while increasing its moisture content. Wang et al. [8] suggested a new ventilation system where the cooling pads were distributed along the entire poultry sidewalls, improving the uniformity of the poultry house conditions. They reported a reduction of 83 % in the air temperature fluctuation, lowering the heat stress on the laying hens.

    • Efficiency of two different types of evaporative cooling systems in broiler houses in Eastern Mediterranean climate conditions

      2021, Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
      Citation Excerpt :

      Petek, Dikmen [35] reported that with a cooling system designed in two stages, a temperature decrease of 5.6 °C could be achieved in Bursa climate conditions. Wang, Zheng [36] reported that the ambient temperature varied between 26.7 and 33.4 °C in a house cooled by conventional FPES where the outdoor temperature was 20.8–41.2 °C and the relative humidity was 18.2–57.7%. Kaydar and Yıldız [37] stated in their study on the cooling of a broiler house with the fan-pad system in the Çukurova Region that when the air flow rate from the pad was 1.41 m s−1, the cooling efficiency was 71.25%, the temperature decrease was 4.99 °C and the saturation level was 85.95%.

    • Air temperature, carbon dioxide, and ammonia assessment inside a commercial cage layer barn with manure-drying tunnels

      2020, Poultry Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Wang et al. (2019) noted a similar pattern of temperature distribution along the building length direction in a poultry house operated with tunnel ventilation system. Their results showed that the air temperature greatly increased along the building length direction in the poultry house with tunnel ventilation system, that is, cooler near the inlets and warmer near the fans, and the temperature at the three different sampling locations increased along the length of the barn because of the addition of sensible heat produced from the laying hens (Wang et al., 2018, 2019). Regardless of the longitudinal gradient observed, there was no difference found laterally (among TC,M, TCT2, and TCT3) or vertically (between TC,B and TC,T), indicating uniform air temperature distribution along these directions and suggesting that tunnel ventilation effectively encouraged more fresh air distribution inside the barn and created a more uniform thermal environment than during the winter.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text