Original article
Congenital heart surgery
Necessity of Temporary Epicardial Pacing Wires After Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.020Get rights and content

Background

Temporary epicardial pacing wires are commonly placed in patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. Though often helpful, these wires are not without risk. We aimed to identify characteristics that would obviate placement of temporary epicardial pacing wires in this patient population.

Methods

A prospective observational study was performed on patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit after surgery for congenital heart disease between October 2011 and October 2012. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of patients in whom wires were not helpful postoperatively.

Results

Wires were placed in 213 of 249 patients. Wires were helpful in 50 patients; 23 for diagnostic purposes only, 17 for therapeutic purposes only, and 10 for both. On logistic regression analysis, absence of intraoperative arrhythmias (p < 0.01), lower arteriovenous O2 difference (p < 0.01), and shorter duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.050) were significant predictors of patients in whom wires were not helpful postoperatively. Further, the predicted probability based on logistic regression model using these 3 variables correctly identified 93% of patients who did not need pacing wires. Four complications (1.9%) related to wires occurred, including 1 episode of life-threatening bleeding that was found, during emergent exploration, to be due to atrial perforation at the wire insertion site.

Conclusions

Temporary epicardial pacing wires are not necessary in many patients recovering from surgery for congenital heart disease. A conservative approach to their use may therefore be warranted.

Section snippets

Study Population

Our study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Wayne State University and the Detroit Medical Center. We performed a prospective observational study of all patients admitted to the intensive care unit at Children's Hospital of Michigan after surgery for congenital heart disease from October 2011 to October 2012. Patients who either had a permanent pacemaker in place before surgery or who underwent pacemaker implantation during their surgery were excluded.

Operative Protocol

Our operative protocol has

Results

During the study, 249 patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common primary procedures performed in this cohort were the following: repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) or TOF-type physiology (n = 28); repair of isolated ventricular septal defect (n = 27); cavopulmonary anastomoses (n = 20); repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect (n = 13); pulmonary valve replacement post-TOF (n = 12); repair of isolated atrial septal defect (n = 10); repair of partial atrioventricular septal

Comment

Placement of temporary epicardial pacing wires after surgery for congenital heart disease in both children and adults for management of postoperative arrhythmias has been commonplace for many years. The frequency of wire placement reported in the literature however, is variable, from placement of 1.2% in 1 center, as reported by Fishberger and colleagues [5], to 72% to 81% at other centers 4, 5, 6, 7. In these latter studies, temporary pacing wires were categorized as clinically useful in 23%

Cited by (4)

  • Arrhythmias: Diagnosis and Management

    2015, Anesthesia for Congenital Heart Disease: Third Edition
View full text