Original article
Suture Versus Screw Fixation of Displaced Tibial Eminence Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.019Get rights and content

Purpose: Classification and treatment of tibial eminence fractures are determined by the degree of fragment displacement. A variety of surgical procedures have been proposed to stabilize displaced fractures using both open and arthroscopic techniques. Two common fixation techniques involve use of cannulated screws and sutures tied over an anterior tibial bone bridge. We are unaware of any biomechanical studies that have compared the strength of various techniques of fixation. Type of Study: Biomechanical study in a cadaveric model. Methods: Seven matched pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were stripped of all soft tissue except the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Simulated type III tibial eminence fractures were created using an osteotome. Fragments of each matched pair were randomized to fixation with either a single 4-mm cannulated cancellous screw with a washer or an arthroscopic suture technique using 3 No. 2 Fiberwire sutures (Arthrex, Naples, FL) passed through the tibial base of the ACL and tied over bone tunnels on the anterior tibial cortex. Specimens were then loaded with a constant load rate of 20 mm/min, and load-deformation curves were generated. The ultimate strength and stiffness were computed for each curve. The failure mode for each test was observed. A paired 2-tailed t test was used to determine the statistically significant difference between the two methods. Results: Specimens fixed with Fiberwire had a mean ultimate strength of 319 N with a standard deviation of 125 N. Those fixed with cannulated screws had a mean ultimate strength of 125 N with a standard deviation of 74 N. This difference was statistically significant (P = .0038). There was no significant difference between the mean stiffness of Fiberwire constructs (63 N; SD, 50 N) and the mean stiffness of the cannulated screw constructs (20 N; SD, 32 N). The failure modes of the Fiberwire constructs included 1 ACL failure, 3 failures of suture cutting through the anterior tibial cortex, and 3 of suture cutting through the tibial eminence fragment. The single mode of failure for the cannulated screw constructs was screw pullout of cancellous bone. Conclusions: The initial ultimate strength of Fiberwire fixation of tibial eminence fractures in these specimens was significantly stronger than that of cannulated screw fixation. Clinical Relevance: It appears that Fiberwire fixation of eminence fractures provides biomechanical advantages over cannulated screw fixation and may influence the type of treatment one chooses for patients with tibial eminence fractures.

Section snippets

Methods

We used 7 matched pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees for this study. Specimens were stored at −20°C and allowed to thaw 24 hours before testing. Each knee was carefully dissected of all soft tissue with the exception of the ACL. Simulated type III tibial eminence fractures were created with a sharp osteotome. The fragments measured 1 cm × 2 cm and were 2-cm deep (Fig 1). The specimens of each matched pair were then randomized to 1 of the 2 treatment groups such that paired specimens

Results

On gross inspection, all specimens had an intact ACL. No specimen had bony defects or evidence of prior instrumentation in the knee joint. The mean age of the specimens was 76.8 years.

Specimens fixed with Fiberwire sutures had a mean ultimate failure load of 319 N (SD, 125 N). The mean ultimate failure load for specimens fixed with a cannulated screw was 125 N (SD, 75 N). This difference was statistically significant at P = .0038.

The mean stiffness of the Fiberwire construct was 63.0 N/mm (SD,

Discussion

Fractures of the tibial eminence have been recently recognized to occur in adults with a frequency similar to that seen in the skeletally immature.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Some reports suggest that eminence fractures in adults are distinguished from those seen in adolescents by a high-energy mechanism of injury and the presence of associated injuries.1, 2 Regardless of the mechanism of injury, classification and treatment of these fractures is dependent on the degree of fragment displacement.6, 7 Although

Conclusions

The initial ultimate strength of Fiberwire fixation of tibial eminence fractures in these specimens was significantly stronger than that of cannulated screw fixation. The stiffness of either construct is the same and is likely a function of the biomechanical properties of the ACL.

References (28)

  • J. Lowe et al.

    The anatomy of tibial eminence fracturesArthroscopic observations following failed closed reduction

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2002)
  • G.W. Keys et al.

    Nonunion of intercondylar eminence fracture of the tibia

    J Trauma

    (1988)
  • A. Delcogliano et al.

    Tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adultsArthroscopic treatment

    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

    (2003)
  • M.H. Meyers et al.

    Fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1959)
  • Cited by (105)

    • Clinical outcome of arthroscopic suture versus screw fixation in tibial avulsion of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally mature patients

      2023, Journal of Orthopaedics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Five biomechanical studies comparing fixation strength of suture and screw in tibial avulsion fracture in cadavers have been published to date [Table 4].28–32 Three of these studies demonstrate better strength with suture,28–30 one of them depicts better fixation strength with the screw31 and one study fails to establish the superiority of one over the other.32 Through extensive Pubmed research, only nine studies related to the comparison of functional outcomes in arthroscopic suture and screw fixation technique in bony ACL were found to be published to date [Table 5].6–14

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text