Evaluation of energy efficiency in biofuel drying by means of energy and exergy analyses
Introduction
In general, the main goal of drying is to decrease the moisture content of solid materials to below a certain limit. Drying is part of several industrial processes for example in the food, chemical, and paper and pulp industries. The main objectives of drying are extended storage life, quality enhancement, and ease of handling and further processing [1].
In this paper, the term biofuel refers to biofuels consumed by the pulp and paper industry. The most important biofuels are bark, forest residues, sawdust, and chips. They are by-products of the main processes and are burnt in fluidised bed boilers to produce heat and electricity for the mill. Power is generated by a steam turbine-generator. The moisture content of these biofuels typically varies between 50% and 60% (water per total mass). One of the main objectives of biofuel drying is to increase the electricity production.
The heat sources with the greatest potential for drying energy in pulp and paper mills are secondary heat flows and steams at different pressures. Secondary heat is, by definition, heat transferred from primary heat sources to process flows—pulp, liquor, and washing waters—and further to circulation water, flue gas, steam, and vent gases [2]. Usually, the technically available secondary heat is hot water in the temperature range 50–90 °C. Steam pressures used in pulp and paper mills typically vary from 3–4 bar (back pressure steam) to 10–12 bar (extraction steam).
The most common way to evaluate the energy efficiency of various drying processes is the specific heat consumption (amount of heat supplied per mass of water evaporated); see e.g. [3], [4], [5], [6]. Because biofuel drying is part of the electricity production process, the specific heat consumption does not necessarily give an exact overview of energy efficiency in drying. In addition to heat consumption, the temperature of the heat source used in drying must be included in the analysis of the drying process. This necessitates Second Law analysis for the drying process. For example, Refs. [7], [8], [9] mention the importance of the Second Law/exergy analysis associated with the drying processes, but it is not used in these papers. In Ref. [10], the exergy method is applied to determine the so-called energy saving ability function.
In this paper, the energy efficiency of the drying is evaluated using two analysis methods: the energy method and the exergy method. The energy analysis is based on the determination of the heat consumption. The exergy analysis is based on the determination of the irreversibility rate. The evaluation methods are applied to two different drying systems, single-stage-drying with partial recycle of spent drying air (SSD) and multi-stage-drying (MSD). Both drying systems are also provided with a heat recovery unit where the inlet air is pre-heated with the outlet air of the dryer.
Section snippets
Single-stage dryer with partial recycle of drying air
Fig. 1 shows a continuous single-stage dryer with partial recycle of spent air including heat recovery unit. As a result of the partial recycle of air and the heat recovery, the air temperature before the heater increases. This decreases the heat consumption of the drying process. Because of the recycle, the fresh drying air has less potential for taking up moisture, which leads to a bigger air mass flow through the drying chamber.
By using the notations in Fig. 1, the energy and mass balance
Determination of irreversibility rate
The dryer is an open steady-state system with two flows of matter (moist material and moist air) and one or several heat inputs and outputs to the system. The irreversibility rate for an open steady-state system is derived in [16], and its general form iswhere Φi represents the heat inputs and outputs from the system. In this paper, the heat input to the system is assumed to be positive. Tr is the temperature at the point on the boundary of the system where the heat transfer is
Results and discussion
The main objective of these calculations is to theoretically compare the energy efficiency of two different drying processes (SSD and MSD) using two evaluation methods (specific heat consumption and irreversibility rate). Both drying systems are provided with heat recovery units (HRU).
Moist biofuel is dried from an initial moisture of 1.5 kg/kgdm to a final moisture of 0.3 kg/kgdm, and the dry mass flow of the fuel is 1 kgdm/s. Two alternative heat sources are available for the heating: steam at a
Conclusions
Two methods to evaluate the energy efficiency of the biofuel drying have been presented and applied to two different drying systems. Both drying systems are also provided with a heat recovery unit, so as to use the best possible drying systems as example dryers. The traditional evaluation method, which is based on the determination of heat consumption, only gives information about the quantity of the energy used in drying. It does not pay any attention to the quality of the energy. The results
References (21)
- et al.
Basic design criteria and corresponding results performance of a pilot-scale fluidized superheated atmospheric steam dryer
Biomass and Bioenergy
(2002) - et al.
Drying technologies for an integrated gasification bio-energy plant
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
(1999) - et al.
Drying energy conservation for deep-bed barley-malt kilns
Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research
(1997) Recent advances in biofuel drying
Chemical Engineering and Processing
(1999)- et al.
Method for life cycle environmental optimisation of a dynamic process exemplified by an analysis of an energy system with a superheated steam dryer in a local districy heat power plant
Chemical Engineering Journal
(2002) A development of the relation between drying energy savings and thermodynamic irreversibility
Chemical Engineering Science
(1984)- et al.
Advances in transport phenomena during convective drying with superheated steam and moist air
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
(1993) - et al.
Drying of foodstuff
- P. Ahtila, P. Svinhufvud, Heat recovery from secondary heat flows of the UPM-Kymmene Kaukas Mill, European Conference...
Predicting the energy consumption of continuous well-mixed fluidized bed dryers from drying kinetic data
Drying Technology
(1999)
Cited by (36)
Current status and prospect of integrating solar air heating systems for drying in various sectors and industries
2022, Sustainable Energy Technologies and AssessmentsCo-gasification of coal and biomass an emerging clean energy technology: Status and prospects of development in Indian context
2019, International Journal of Mining Science and TechnologyCitation Excerpt :Because, co-gasification can be used to turn lower-priced for making of char from coal, petroleum coke, municipal solid waste and agriculture waste into valuable products like substitute natural gas, electricity, fuels, chemicals and fertilizers. Also, co-gasification offers wide fuel flexibility giving it more freedom to adjust to the price and availability of a feedstock [129,145–151]. Co-gasification can convert high ash coal and biomass waste into power and valuable products-both reducing a cost of managing waste and providing a source of income as the waste becomes a commodity feedstock [151].
Critical review of current industrial scale lignite drying technologies
2017, Low-rank Coals for Power Generation, Fuel and Chemical ProductionComparative thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification-based light olefin production using methanol or DME as the platform chemical
2016, Chemical Engineering Research and Design