Elsevier

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volume 211, February 2019, Pages 77-83
Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Clicker training increases exploratory behaviour and time spent at the front of the enclosure in shelter cats; Implications for welfare and adoption rates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.12.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Stress in shelter cats may cause inactivity and hiding, but adopters seek friendly, outgoing animals.

  • Clicker training was found to increase cats’ exploratory behaviour and time spent at the front of the cages in a rescue shelter.

  • Clicker training was also found to reduce the time spent inactive.

  • Human-approach response improved in 4 cats after training but the sample size was small and the results were non-significant.

Abstract

The rescue shelter environment is known to be stressful for domestic cats, which can lead to them becoming less active, playful and exploratory as well as spending a long time hiding. Early adoption can prevent long term stress in shelter cats, but adopters often look at behaviour and friendliness as criteria when choosing a cat to rehome. This study aimed to test the efficacy of a clicker training intervention to promote behaviours indicative of improved welfare and increase the potential adoptability of cats in rescue shelters. Twelve cats were clicker trained over two weeks their behaviour and response to humans was recorded before and after the training schedule. Cats showed significantly more exploratory behaviour, a decrease in inactivity and spent more time at the front of their enclosures after training. Four of the cats which failed the human approach test initially, passed it after training but this result was nonsignificant. Clicker training may be a simple and rapid way to improve welfare and adoptability in rescue cats.

Introduction

The welfare of domestic cats may be at risk due to owners relinquishing their animals to rehoming centres and shelters (Casey et al., 2009). Reasons for relinquishment include health problems such as allergies to cat fur, changes in circumstances (such as a move to rented accommodation not allowing pets), and behavioural problems (Scarlett et al., 1999; Shore et al., 2003; Casey et al., 2009). Stray and feral cats also account for a large proportion of the residential shelter population worldwide (Salman et al., 1998, Levy and Crawford, 2004; Alberthsen et al., 2013).

The shelter environment is often stressful for cats, due to a combination of novel stimuli, healthcare and handling procedures which cats perceive as aversive, and close proximity to other felines (as cats tend to be solitary, territorial and intolerant of unrelated conspecifics (Ley, 2015)). Additionally, there are usually restrictions on space and lack of control over the environment (Dybdall et al., 2007; Gourkow et al., 2014a,b).

This stress can manifest in a variety of ways such as aggression to humans or conspecifics, repetitive behaviours such as pacing or over-grooming and stress-related health problems, such as upper respiratory tract infections exacerbated by the immunosuppressive effects of high cortisol levels (Tanaka et al., 2012). Cats generally spend a proportion of their activity budget inactive, but inactivity is seen to increase with long shelter stays, along with agonistic behaviour (Gouveia et al., 2011). Inactivity may be related to stress, as cats more frequently respond to aversive environments by inactivity rather than behavioural abnormality (Rochlitz, 2000), although it is difficult to quantify how much inactivity is indicative of reduced welfare states.

Inactivity in enclosed environments also predisposes cats to health problems such as obesity (Scarlett et al., 1994; Selman, 2017) and diabetes mellitus (Slingerland et al., 2009). Furthermore, activity levels directly affect adoptability, with active cats having greater adoption rates (Fantuzzi et al., 2010). Therefore, decreasing inactivity in shelter cats would be beneficial for a number of reasons.

Long term residents of shelters may experience ongoing stress as well as being at increased risk for euthanasia due to overcrowding (Alberthsen et al., 2013, Salman et al., 2000, Bartlett et al., 2005), therefore early adoption is the goal of many rescue shelters. There are many factors which may influence the adoptability of an individual cat, such as age, breed, sex, pelage and health status (Lepper et al., 2002).

Behaviour and temperament may also play a large role in the likelihood of a cat being rehomed, with many potential adopters citing cats’ willingness to interact with them, friendliness and a happy disposition as a major influencing factor in their decision-making process (Dybdall and Strasser, 2014; Gourkow, 2001; Gourkow and Fraser, 2006). Unfortunately, previous research suggests that the length of time cats spend within shelters may contribute to a reduction in activity levels, with long-stay residents demonstrating greater levels of inactivity and time spent engaging in negative behaviours compared to cats who had spent less time in that environment, perhaps due to their stress levels rising over the duration of their stay (Gouveia et al., 2011). Therefore, adoptability is directly linked to welfare, as early adoptions can prevent the cumulative effect of the stressful shelter environment.

Such research highlights the fact that efforts should be made to reduce the amount of stress experienced by shelter cats, whilst simultaneously reducing the length of time cats spend within a shelter before being rehomed (Gouveia et al., 2011). According to Gourkow and Fraser (2006), consistent and positive handling experiences with humans may directly correlate with lower stress scores and a reduction of fear-induced aggression in shelter cats. This is supported by Gourkow et al. (2014a,b) who discovered that regular gentle, positive handling experiences increased behavioural indicators of contentment and reduced physiological indicators of stress in shelter cats significantly.

In recent years operant conditioning using positive reinforcement-based training methods such as clicker training have become recognised as a valuable method of managing captive species (Melfi, 2013) and can facilitate animals’ voluntary cooperation with otherwise aversive handling procedures (Ward and Melfi, 2013), leading to a decrease in stress (Savastano et al., 2003). Clicker training is also a form of enrichment as it encourages animals to be more physically active as well as stimulating them mentally whilst promoting positive interactions with humans (Laule and Desmond, 1998). However, Westlund (2014) stresses that training may only be considered a form of enrichment if meets certain criteria, such as empowering the animal to feel in control over its environment and facilitating the animal to perform its natural behaviours. Ward and Melfi (2013) add that such positive interactions may serve to reduce animals’ feelings of fearfulness towards humans which reduces their stress levels and therefore improves welfare. Captive felines are particularly susceptible to high stress levels (Shepherdson et al., 1993) and therefore may benefit from training programs that encourage species-appropriate behavioural repertoires in an environment where they have limited sensory stimuli (Wells, 2009). Although domestic dogs undergo regular training and behavioural modification within shelters to alter their behaviour to be more desirable to adopters (Luescher and Medlock, 2009) this practise is rarely, if at all, implemented amongst shelter cats.

Cats can be clicker trained to perform novel behaviour (Kogan et al., 2017), but it is not clear whether training can reduce behavioural signs of stress and increase behaviours likely to result in early adoption. Shelter staff have limited time available for training so a method which is easy to use and takes little time, while demonstrating maximum effectiveness would be the most likely to make a practical difference to the welfare and adoptability of rescue cats. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that 10 min sessions of clicker training 3 times per week for 2 weeks would:

  • i

    Increase exploratory behaviour in shelter cats

  • ii

    Increase playful behaviour

  • iii

    Reduce inactivity

  • iv

    Increase the amount of time spent at the front of the cage

  • v

    Improve cats’ initial responses to unfamiliar humans, measured by the human approach test (Arhant and Troxler, 2017)

Section snippets

Methodology

The project was approved by Oxford Brookes University and RSPCA Oxfordshire. Due to the test subjects residing in a rehoming centre and awaiting adoption, it was important that any research being carried out would not disrupt the rehoming procedure or compromise their chances of finding new homes. Therefore, normal adoption proceedings continued throughout the course of the project and a number of subjects were rehomed before the project had run its full course. As one of the primary goals of

Results

Cats spent significantly more time in exploratory behaviour after training (Fig. 2), (n = 12; T = 4.33; p = 0.001). Although the mean time spent playing increased slightly after training, due to the high variability of this behaviour between subjects, no significant difference in play was found (n-12; T=-1.08; p = 0.302). There was a significant decrease in mean time spent inactive (Fig. 3) (n = 12; T = 4.09; p = 0.002).

Cats spent significantly more time at the front of the cage after training (

Exploratory behaviour

Prior to the clicker training sessions, the majority of the subjects demonstrated a considerable lack of exploratory behaviour, with several of the subjects spending absolutely no time exploring during the ten-minute observational sessions whatsoever. The results of this study showed that there was a significant increase in exploratory behaviour post-clicker training, which supports our prediction that clicker training will increase exploratory behaviour. These results suggest that the clicker

Conclusion

The aim of this study was to investigate whether clicker training has a positive effect on the welfare of cats confined to a rehoming centre, measured by behavioural scores and the human approach test. Improvements were seen in the amount of time the subjects spent exploring, engaged in other behaviours, positioned at the front of their cages and individuals’ HAT scores, whilst inactivity decreased. Due to a number of limitations to the study, the author suggests that it may prove beneficial to

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge and give thanks to Common Leys farm campus and the RSPCA, Oxfordshire for giving permission for this research to be conducted on their premises. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their comments, which improved the manuscript.

References (57)

  • I.R. Kemp et al.

    The relation of hippocampal theta activity to arousal, attentive behaviour and somato-motor movements in unrestrained cats

    Brain Res.

    (1975)
  • A.U. Luescher et al.

    The effects of training and environmental alterations on adoption success of shelter dogs

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2009)
  • V. Melfi

    Is training zoo animals enriching?

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2013)
  • I. Meyer et al.

    The relationship between number of training sessions per week and learning in dogs

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2008)
  • S.R. Ross et al.

    Space use as an indicator of enclosure appropriateness: a novel measure of captive animal welfare

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2009)
  • J. Rushen et al.

    Domestic animals' fear of humans and its effect on their welfare

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (1999)
  • L.I. Slingerland et al.

    Indoor confinement and physical inactivity rather than the proportion of dry food are risk factors in the development of feline type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Vet. J.

    (2009)
  • L.A. Stanton et al.

    A standardized ethogram for the felidae: A tool for behavioral researchers

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2015)
  • C.M. Vinke et al.

    Will a hiding box provide stress reduction for shelter cats?

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2014)
  • S.J. Ward et al.

    The implications of husbandry training on zoo animal response rates

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2013)
  • D.L. Wells

    Sensory stimulation as environmental enrichment for captive animals: a review

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2009)
  • K. Westlund

    Training is enrichment—and beyond

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2014)
  • C. Alberthsen et al.

    Cat admissions to RSPCA shelters in Queensland, Australia: description of cats and risk factors for euthanasia after entry

    Aust. Vet. J.

    (2013)
  • M. Amat et al.

    Stress in owned cats: behavioural changes and welfare implications

    J. Feline Med. Surg.

    (2016)
  • P.C. Bartlett et al.

    Rates of euthanasia and adoption for dogs and cats in Michigan animal shelters

    J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci .

    (2005)
  • K. Carlstead et al.

    Behavioural and adrenocortical responses to environmental changes in leopard cats (Felis Bengalensis)

    Zoo Biol.

    (1993)
  • R.A. Casey et al.

    Reasons for relinquishment and return of domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) to rescue shelters in the UK

    Anthrozos

    (2009)
  • K. Dybdall et al.

    Is there a bias against stray cats in shelters? People’s perception of shelter cats and how it influences adoption time

    Anthrozos

    (2014)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Welfare and quality of life assessments for shelter cats: A scoping review

      2023, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Two publications presented studies that used training methods as their welfare intervention. The effect of the training programs were measured through ethogram-based assessments, changes in mucosal immunity via s-IgA (Gourkow and Phillips, 2016), and via the HAT (Grant and Warrior, 2019). Cats that received training were more likely to be rated content on an ethogram-based assessment, more likely to approach humans following the training program, and had a higher mucosal immunity resulting in fewer cats becoming sick with an upper respiratory infection during the training period (Gourkow and Phillips, 2016; Grant and Warrior, 2019).

    • Increasing shelter cat welfare through enrichment: A review

      2022, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, not all domestic cats live in human homes and many cats end up in an animal shelter or rescue at some point in their lives (Vojtkovská et al., 2020; Weiss et al., 2015). Given that an estimated 3.2 million cats enter U.S. shelters every year (Vojtkovská et al., 2020), that the shelter environment can be extremely stressful for cats (Grant and Warrior, 2019), and that stressed cats may exhibit a lower diversity of behavior (Rehnberg et al., 2015), it appears cats living in shelters are posed with distinct welfare concerns. One way to assess proper welfare is through the animal’s ability to engage in natural, species-specific behaviors (Casey and Bradshaw, 2005; Fraser and Weary, 2004).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text