Stress concentration factors of multi-planar tubular XT-joints subjected to out-of-plane bending moments

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2020.102058Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The SCFs in multi-planar tubular XT-joints under three types of OPB loading were investigated.

  • For the numerical study, a FE model was developed and verified against experimental data.

  • Altogether, 81 FE models were generated to study the geometrical effects on the SCFs.

  • A new set of SCF parametric equations was developed for the OPB-loaded multi-planar XT-joints.

Abstract

The majority of tubular joints commonly found in offshore jacket structures are multi-planar. Investigating the effect of loaded out-of-plane braces on the values of the stress concentration factor (SCF) in offshore tubular joints has been the objective of numerous research works. However, due to the diversity of joint types and loading conditions, a number of quite important cases still exist that have not been studied thoroughly. Among them are multi-planar XT-joints subjected to out-of-plane bending (OPB) moment loading. In the present research, data extracted from the stress analysis of 81 finite element (FE) models, verified using experimental test results, was used to study the effects of geometrical parameters on the chord-side SCFs in multi-planar tubular XT-joints subjected to three types of OPB moment loading. Parametric FE study was followed by a set of the nonlinear regression analyses to develop three new SCF parametric equations for the fatigue analysis and design of OPB-loaded multi-planar XT-joints.

Introduction

The main structural part of a jacket-type platform, commonly used for the production of oil and gas in offshore fields (Fig. 1a), is a space frame fabricated from circular hollow section (CHS) members (Fig. 1b) by welding the prepared end of brace members onto the undisturbed surface of the chord, resulting in what is called a tubular joint (Fig. 1c).

Tubular joints are subjected to cyclic loads induced by sea waves and hence they are susceptible to fatigue damage due to the formation and propagation of cracks. Significant stress concentrations at the vicinity of the welds are highly detrimental to the fatigue life of a tubular connection. For the design purposes, a parameter called the stress concentration factor (SCF) is used to quantify the stress concentration. This calls for greater emphasis in accurate calculation of the SCFs to estimate the fatigue life of offshore structures.

The SCF, defined as the ratio of the local surface stress at the brace-to-chord intersection to the nominal stress in the brace, exhibits considerable scatter depending on the joint geometry, loading type, weld size and type, and the considered position for the SCF calculation around the weld profile. Under any specific loading condition, the SCF value along the weld toe of a tubular joint is mainly determined by the joint geometry. To study the behavior of tubular joints and to easily relate this behavior to the geometrical characteristics of the joint, a set of dimensionless geometrical parameters has been defined. Fig. 1c depicts a multi-planar tubular XT-joint with the geometrical parameters τ, γ, β, α, and αB for chord and brace diameters D and d, and their corresponding wall thicknesses T and t. Critical positions along the weld toe of the brace-to-chord intersection for the calculation of SCFs in a tubular joint, i.e. saddle and crown, have been shown in Fig. 1c.

Over the past thirty years, significant effort has been devoted to the study of SCFs in various uniplanar tubular joints (i.e. joints where the axes of the chord and brace members lay in the same plane). As a result, many parametric design formulas in terms of the joint's geometrical parameters have been proposed providing SCF values at certain positions adjacent to the weld for several loading conditions. The reader is referred for example to Kuang et al. [1], Efthymiou [2], Hellier et al. [3], UK HSE OTH 354 [4], and Karamanos et al. [5] (for the SCF calculation at the saddle and crown positions of simple uniplanar T-, Y-, X-, K-, and KT-joints); Gho and Gao [6], Gao [7], Gao et al. [8], and Yang et al. [9] (for the SCF determination in uniplanar overlapped tubular joints); Nwosu et al. [10], Ramachandra et al. [11], Hoon et al. [12], Myers et al. [13], Ahmadi et al. [14, 15], Ahmadi and Lotfollahi-Yaghin [16], and Ahmadi and Zavvar [17] (for the SCF calculation in various stiffened tubular joints); and Morgan and Lee [18, 19], Chang and Dover [20, 21], Shao [22, 23], Shao et al. [24], Lotfollahi-Yaghin and Ahmadi [25], Ahmadi et al. [26], Xu et al. [27], and Liu et al. [28] (for the study of the SCF distribution along the weld toe of various uniplanar joints).

Multi-planar joints are an intrinsic feature of offshore tubular structures. The multi-planarity effect might play an important role in the stress distribution at the brace-to-chord intersection. Thus for such multi-planar connections, the parametric formulas of simple uniplanar tubular joints may not be applicable for the SCF prediction, since such formulas may lead to highly over- or under-predicting results. Nevertheless, for multi-planar joints which cover the majority of practical applications, much fewer investigations have been reported due to the complexity and high cost involved. The reader is referred to Karamanos et al. [29] and Chiew et al. [30] (for the SCF calculation in XX-joints); Wingerde et al. [31] (for the SCF determination in KK-joints); Karamanos et al. [32] (for the study of SCFs in DT-joints); Woghiren and Brennan [33] (for the SCF calculation in stiffened KK-joints); Chiew et al. [34] (for the study of SCFs in XT-joints); and Lotfollahi-Yaghin and Ahmadi [35], Ahmadi et al. [36, 37], Ahmadi and Lotfollahi-Yaghin [38], and Ahmadi and Zavvar [39] (for the investigation of SCFs in multi-planar KT-joints under axial loads), among others.

For other SCF-related investigations such as probabilistic and reliability studies, the reader is referred for example to Ahmadi et al. [40], Gaspar et al. [41], Ahmadi and Lotfollahi-Yaghin [42, 43], Ahmadi et al. [44, 45], Ahmadi [46], and Ahmadi and Mousavi Nejad Benam [47].

In the present paper, results of numerical investigations of the stress concentration in multi-planar tubular XT-joints are presented and discussed. In this research program, a set of parametric finite element (FE) stress analyses was carried out on 81 tubular XT-joint models subjected to three types of out-of-plane bending (OPB) moment loading (Fig. 2). The analysis results were used to present general remarks on the effect of geometrical parameters including τ (brace-to-chord thickness ratio), γ (chord wall slenderness ratio), β (brace-to-chord diameter ratio), and α (chord length-to-radius ratio) on the SCFs at the saddle positions. The crown positions were not studied. The reason is that under the OPB moment loading, the nominal stress at the crown positions is zero and hence the determination of SCFs is not needed. Based on the results of XT-joint FE models, verified using experimental measurements, a SCF database was prepared. Then, a new set of SCF parametric equations was established, based on nonlinear regression analyses, for the fatigue analysis and design of multi-planar XT-joints subjected to OPB moment loading. The reliability of proposed equations was evaluated according to the acceptance criteria recommended by the UK DoE [48].

Section snippets

Simulation of the weld profile

Accurate modeling of the weld profile is one of the most critical factors affecting the accuracy of SCF results. Therefore, the weld sizes must be carefully included in the FE modeling. A number of research works has been carried out on the study of the weld effect. For example, the reader is referred to Lee and Wilmshurst [49], Cao et al. [50] and Lee [51], among others. It was found that the fatigue strength of the joint can be underestimated by 20% compared to the experimental data without

Settings of parametric study

In order to study the SCFs in multi-planar tubular XT-joints subjected to three types of OPB moment loading (Fig. 2), 81 models were generated and analyzed using the FE software, ANSYS. The objective was to investigate the effects of non-dimensional geometrical parameters on the chord-side SCFs at the saddle positions. As mentioned earlier, the crown positions were not studied. The reason is that under the OPB moment loading, the nominal stress at the crown position is zero and hence the

Effect of the multi-planarity on the SCF values and the comparison of SCFs at different positions

The uniplanar and multi-planar SCF values are compared in Fig. 11 indicating that there can be a quite big difference between the SCF values at the saddle positions of uniplanar and multi-planar T-joints. For example, under the 1st OPB moment loading condition, the SCF value at the WS1 saddle position of the XT81 model (α=24,β=0.5,γ=24,τ=1.0) is twice the SCF at the saddle position of the corresponding uniplanar T-joint (Fig. 11a); while under the 2nd OPB moment loading condition, the SCF value

Comparison of SCFs under different types of OPB moment loading

A sample set of eight multi-planar XT-joints was selected (Table 6) to depict the differences among the SCFs under the three types of OPB moment loading shown in Fig. 2. Results given in Table 7 show that the WS1 SCFs under the 1st OPB moment loading condition are the biggest values observed. It can also be seen that the WS1 SCFs under the 1st OPB load case are almost equal to the WS2 SCFs under the 2nd and 3rd OPB load cases; where, on an average basis, the WS1 SCFs under the 1st OPB load case

Deriving parametric equations for the SCF calculation

Three individual parametric equations are proposed in the present paper, to calculate the chord-side SCFs at the saddle positions on the weld toe of multi-planar tubular XT-joints subjected to OPB moment loading.

Results of multiple nonlinear regression analyses performed by SPSS were used to develop parametric SCF design formulas. Values of dependent variable (i.e. SCF) and independent variables (i.e. β, γ, τ, and α) constitute the input data imported in the form of a matrix. Each row of this

Conclusions

Results of stress analysis performed on 81 FE models verified using experimental data were used to investigate the effect of geometrical parameters on the chord-side SCFs at the saddle positions in multi-planar tubular XT-joints, also called three-planar T-joints, under three types of OPB moment loading. A set of SCF parametric equations was also developed for the fatigue design. Main conclusions are summarized as follows.

The increase of the parameters τ, γ, and β leads to the increase of SCFs

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Tabriz for supporting this work under the Research Grant Contract No. S/2863. Useful comments of anonymous reviewers on draft version of this paper are also highly appreciated.

References (58)

  • H. Ahmadi et al.

    Stress concentration due to in-plane bending (IPB) loads in ring-stiffened tubular KT-joints of offshore structures: parametric study and design formulation

    Appl. Ocean Res.

    (2015)
  • H. Ahmadi et al.

    Stress concentration factors induced by out-of-plane bending loads in ring-stiffened tubular KT-joints of jacket structures

    Thin-Walled Struct.

    (2015)
  • M.R. Morgan et al.

    Parametric equations for distributions of stress concentration factors in tubular K-joints under out-of-plane moment loading

    Int. J. Fatigue

    (1998)
  • M.R. Morgan et al.

    Prediction of stress concentrations and degrees of bending in axially loaded tubular K-joints

    J. Constr. Steel Res.

    (1998)
  • E. Chang et al.

    Prediction of stress distributions along the intersection of tubular Y and T-joints

    Int. J. Fatigue

    (1999)
  • E. Chang et al.

    Parametric equations to predict stress distributions along the intersection of tubular X and DT-joints

    Int. J. Fatigue

    (1999)
  • Y.B. Shao

    Geometrical effect on the stress distribution along weld toe for tubular T- and K-joints under axial loading

    J. Constr. Steel Res.

    (2007)
  • Y.B. Shao et al.

    Prediction of hot spot stress distribution for tubular K-joints under basic loadings

    J. Constr. Steel Res.

    (2009)
  • M.A. Lotfollahi-Yaghin et al.

    Effect of geometrical parameters on SCF distribution along the weld toe of tubular KT-joints under balanced axial loads

    Int. J. Fatigue

    (2010)
  • H. Ahmadi et al.

    Geometrical effect on SCF distribution in uni-planar tubular DKT-joints under axial loads

    J. Constr. Steel Res.

    (2011)
  • F. Xu et al.

    Experimental investigation of SCF distribution for thin-walled concrete-filled CHS joints under axial tension loading

    Thin-Walled Struct.

    (2015)
  • G. Liu et al.

    Prediction of stress distribution along the intersection of tubular T-joints by a novel structural stress approach

    Int. J. Fatigue

    (2015)
  • S.A. Karamanos et al.

    Stress concentrations in multi-planar welded CHS XX-connections

    J. Constr. Steel Res.

    (1999)
  • S.P. Chiew et al.

    General SCF design equations for steel multiplanar tubular XX-joints

    Int. J. Fatigue

    (2000)
  • S.A. Karamanos et al.

    SCF equations in multi-planar welded tubular DT-joints including bending effects

    Mar. Struct.

    (2002)
  • C.O. Woghiren et al.

    Weld toe stress concentrations in multi planar stiffened tubular KK joints

    Int. J. Fatigue

    (2009)
  • M.A. Lotfollahi-Yaghin et al.

    Geometric stress distribution along the weld toe of the outer brace in two-planar tubular DKT-joints: parametric study and deriving the SCF design equations

    Mar. Struct.

    (2011)
  • H. Ahmadi et al.

    Distribution of weld toe stress concentration factors on the central brace in two-planar CHS DKT-connections of steel offshore structures

    Thin-Walled Struct.

    (2011)
  • H. Ahmadi et al.

    The development of fatigue design formulas for the outer brace SCFs in offshore three-planar tubular KT-joints

    Thin-Walled Struct.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text