Elsevier

Applied Ocean Research

Volume 75, June 2018, Pages 37-52
Applied Ocean Research

Physical Model of wave-induced seabed response around trenched pipeline in sandy seabed

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2018.02.021Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Systematic flume experiments were carried out to understand the wave-induced seabed response around a trenched pipeline in sandy seabed.

  • An integrated model was applied for wave-seabed-pipeline interaction.

  • Different backfilled depth and configuration of pipeline were considered.

  • The effect of soil permeability on seabed response is discussed.

Abstract

The phenomenon of wave-seabed-pipeline interactions is one of the primary concerns of coastal engineers and researchers, as it could greatly affect the seabed instability and pipeline safety. Numerous researchers have expended great effort in studying wave-seabed-pipeline interactions in the past. However, the majority of them focussed on the wave-induced response around a submarine pipeline, in buried conditions, by numerical models and laboratory experiments. Unlike the previous studies, a series of regular wave experiments and numerical model analyses were conducted to investigate the wave-induced pore pressure in the sandy seabed, around a pipeline with different backfilled depths. The model pipeline with three diameters (D = 6 cm, 8 cm, and 10 cm) is buried in three sizes of sand, d50 = 0.15 mm, d50 = 0.3 mm, and d50 = 0.5 mm, with different backfilled depths. The results show that the pore pressure amplitude in the seabed is a minimum with a backfilled depth D, and a maximum with full backfill or a backfilled depth of zero. The pore-pressure amplitude increases as the backfill sand median diameter increases. The effects of the pipeline diameter on pore-water pressure are also analysed and discussed.

Introduction

Submarine pipelines play an extremely important role in offshore engineering for the transportation of offshore oil and gas. One of the critical problems in the design of a pipeline, that is laid on or partly buried in the porous seabed, is to assess whether the pipeline will remain stable with the strong action of ocean waves. Clearly, the wave-induced seabed interaction around the pipeline is of particular importance in the design of offshore pipeline installations, and has attracted considerable attention among coastal and geotechnical engineers. In the past years, numerous offshore pipelines have been reported damaged from wave-induced seabed instability [[1], [2], [3], [4]], as opposed to construction or material breakdowns. When a pipeline is placed in a trench with different backfilled depths, it could significantly disturb the wave motion and wave pressure around the pipeline, and consequently lead to changes in the effective stress in the seabed. Therefore, the evaluation of the wave-induced seabed response is of particular importance when designing protection of offshore pipelines.

Because of its practical importance, and potential engineering applications, extensive investigations on the interaction between waves, seabed, and pipelines have been conducted in recent years, using both theoretical and experimental approaches [[5], [6]]. However, understanding the results of studies on wave-seabed-trenched pipelines, with different backfilled depths, remains incomplete. For example, MacPherson [7] studied the wave-induced pore pressure in a permeable seabed around a pipeline, and indicated that the seepage force should be considered. Cheng and Liu [8] used a boundary integral equation method to investigate the effects of wave and seabed parameters on the uplift seepage force and pore pressure around a pipeline, that was buried in a rectangular region with impermeable walls. There were a number of numerical analyses considering the effects of a cover layer with full backfilled conditions on the wave-induced seabed dynamic response around a buried pipeline [[9], [10], [11], [12]]. However, these models may not be able to predict the seabed response in the neighbourhood of a pipeline when a wave is propagating over a partially backfilled pipeline, as opposed to fully backfilled. More recently, Zhao et al. [13] and Lin et al. [14] developed numerical models to investigate wave-induced soil responses around a buried pipeline, that was partially backfilled, and predicted the stability of a submarine pipeline. Their results showed that the pipeline backfilled up to a certain depth is better protected against wave-induced liquefaction.

In addition to the aforementioned theoretical methods mentioned above, some laboratory experiments have been conducted to investigate wave-induced soil dynamic responses, and the stability of offshore pipelines. Among these, Pan and Wang [15] carried out a series of large-scale laboratory experiments to study wave-induced pore pressures around shallowly embedded pipelines. Higher pore pressures were recorded at the top, and lower pore pressures at the bottom of a pipeline, for a sandy seabed. Sumer et al. [[16], [17]] conducted a series of physical experiments to investigate the stability of pipelines on a liquefied sandy seabed, and the onset of scour below the pipeline in currents/waves. By analysing the pore-water pressures measured upstream and downstream of a partially buried pipeline, they reported that the excessive seepage flow and the resulting piping were two primary factors that caused the onset of scour below the pipeline. Sumer et al. [18] further extended the physical experiments to investigate the dynamic response around a pipeline buried in soil, and exposed to a progressive wave, by measuring pore pressures. The presence of the pipeline had no major influence on the build-up of pore pressure at the top of the pipe. The results further indicated that liquefaction initially occurred in the very top layer, and developed downwards, but was different in the vicinity of the pipe. Recently, Zhou et al. [19] experimentally studied the combined effects of waves and currents on the characteristics of soil responses around a marine pipeline. The results showed that the current intensifies the erosion process in all types of soils, and pore pressures in sandy soil decrease marginally over time. Yang et al. [[20], [21], [22]] presented results from a series of laboratory experimental models that studied the major safety issues of subsea pipelines induced by seabed scouring. A rubber plate was placed between the submarine pipeline and the bed, while a rigid spoiler was attached to the top of the pipe. The experiments showed that the rigid spoiler could increase the scour depth, thus greatly speeding up self-burying. In addition, they found that there existed a critical length of rubber plate, greater than which there was no scour around the pipeline and the pipeline was protected. If the rubber plate was shorter than the critical length, scour around the pipeline was significantly increased and self-burial of the pipe was accelerated. Recently, Fredsøe [23] reviewed the cause of pipeline-seabed interaction and the resulting consequences for pipeline stability in a natural environment.

The aforementioned studies focused on the wave-induced seabed response around a pipeline that is either fully buried, or resting on the seabed in different types of soil. However, in engineering practice, pipelines are occasionally placed in a trench that is partially backfilled with soil excavated from the seabed during trenching, or coarser materials, to reduce the possibility of instability/liquefaction. To date, only a few theoretical studies regarding the effects of partial backfill on the wave-induced seabed response around a buried pipeline are available in the literature, therefore, the actual mechanisms behind this marine process may not be fully captured or explained. Moreover, there is no physical modelling for the effects of a backfill layer on the dynamic soil response surrounding a trenched pipeline. Therefore, it is important to conduct such an experiment to properly and accurately predict wave-induced soil response around a pipeline, that is partially backfilled, in a porous seabed. The primary aim of this study is to present results from an experimental study of soil behaviour around a trenched pipeline, with different backfill depths in various types of soils, subject to regular wave action. To the best of the authors knowledge, the present study is the first set of wave experiments regarding a trench layer with a partially buried pipeline. At the same time, a numerical model is used to investigate the distribution of wave-induced pore-water pressure for different seabed conditions.

Section snippets

Experimental set-up

The experiments were conducted in a wave flume, 1.0 m wide, 1.3 m deep, and 50 m long. The experiment was performed at a 1:30 geometric scale, and at a 1 g condition (g is the gravational acceleration). Hettler [24] pointed out that, at 1 g, the soil in a field test can be used in model experiments without particle size scaling, although the geotechnical engineers argued about the stress level within the seabed. Fig. 1 shows the detailed setup of the experiment. The bottom of the flume was

Numerical model

In this study, the wave-soil-structure interaction (WSSI) model of Zhang et al. [27] is applied to simulate the complex wave-seabed-pipeline interactions, assuming that deformations of the porous seabed are negligible, and have no impact on the wave transformation above the seabed. The wave model COBRAS [28], based on the volume-averaged Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (VARANS) equations, is used to predict the wave pressure and effective stress on the solid-liquid interface, and the flow of

Wave-seabed-trenched pipeline interactions

As shown in Fig. 4, the wave-induced pore-water pressure (Δu) is periodically oscillatory, and the residual pore-water pressure is negligible in a sandy seabed. Such phenomena were observed in all tests conducted, and are ascribed to the fact that the grain size of the sediment used in this study is too large (d50 = 0.15 mm) to generate residual pore-water pressure. The pore-water pressure induced by the previous wave loading was fully dissipated before the next wave arrived. Fig. 5 presents

Conclusion

In this study, a comprehensive investigation was carried out on different soil dynamic responses around a pipeline, to regular waves in a sandy seabed, by a series of experimental flume tests and an integrated WSSI model. In the laboratory experiments, four wave conditions and three types of sand were used. Six different pipeline backfilled depths and three pipeline diameters were considered. In the numerical model, the ocean wave was described by the RANS equations, and the dynamic response of

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support from the national key research and development program of China (2017YFC1404200), the research grants of Jiangsu (BK20150804), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University, China (2014B05114), the marine renewable energy research project of State Oceanic Administration (GHME2015GC01), and Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University (Grant No: 2016491011).

References (41)

  • L.P. Yang et al.

    Calculation and experiment on scour depth for submarine pipeline with a spoiler

    Ocean Eng.

    (2012)
  • L.P. Yang et al.

    Scour protection of submarine pipelines using rubber plates underneath the pipes

    Ocean Eng.

    (2014)
  • J.S. Zhang et al.

    Numerical study for waves propagating over a porous seabed around a submerged permeable breakwater: PORO-WSSI II model

    Ocean Eng.

    (2011)
  • S.C. Chang et al.

    An experimental study on non-linear progressive wave-induced dynamic stresses in seabed

    Ocean Eng.

    (2007)
  • T.L. Lee et al.

    Ocean waves propagating over a porous seabed of finite thickness

    Ocean Eng.

    (2002)
  • S.Y. Tzang et al.

    Laboratory flume studies on monochromatic wave-fine sandy bed interactions part 1: soil fluidization

    Coast. Eng.

    (2006)
  • D.S. Jeng

    Numerical modeling for wave-seabed-pipe interaction in a non-homogeneous porous seabed

    Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.

    (2001)
  • B.M. Sumer

    Liquefaction Around Marine Structures

    (2014)
  • B.M. Sumer et al.

    The Mechanics of Scour in the Marine Environment

    (2002)
  • J.B. Herbich et al.

    Seafloor Scour-design Guidelines for Ocean-founded Structures

    (1984)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Numerical analysis of seabed liquefaction in the vicinity of two tandem pipelines in a trench

      2022, Ocean Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      In their study, the design of a trench layer was also involved. In addition to numerical approximations, Zhai et al. (2018) and Sun et al. (2019) have conducted wave experiments for the wave-induced seabed response around a trenched pipeline. However, the effect of the ocean current was not taken into account in their experiments.

    • Numerical modeling of combined wave and current-induced residual liquefaction around twin pipelines

      2022, Ocean Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      The same result was also found by Pan et al. (2007). Zhai et al. (2018) and Sun et al. (2019) studied the excess pore pressure around a partially buried pipeline in a trench layer. They found that the amplitude of the pore pressure around the trench layer was asymmetrically distributed along the periphery of the pipeline.

    • Numerical study of Articulated Concrete Mattresses (ACMs) for offshore pipeline protection

      2022, Ocean Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      For considering the tripartite interaction between fluid, seabed, and trenched pipelines, a few numerical models were proposed for the analysis of the Wave–Seabed–Pipeline Interactions (WSPI) involving a fully trenched layer (Gao et al., 2003; Gao and Wu, 2006; Chen et al., 2019) and a partially buried one (Zhao and Jeng, 2016; Lin et al., 2016; Duan et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019; Liang et al., 2020). In addition, a series of laboratory experimental studies were conducted to reveal the development of wave-induced pore water pressures around a partially buried pipeline in a trench layer (Zhai et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2019). The above research proves the effectiveness of trenches in protecting pipelines and provides valuable guidance for engineering applications.

    • Wave induced silty seabed response around a trenched pipeline

      2022, Ocean Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Only a few physical experimental studies are available. Sun et al. (2019) and Zhai et al. (2018) conducted a series of experiments to study the sandy seabed response around pipeline in a trench with partial backfill soil under regular waves. Their results indicated that the trench decreased the oscillatory pore pressure, while backfill could effectively protect pipeline.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text