Elsevier

Applied Catalysis A: General

Volume 557, 5 May 2018, Pages 99-107
Applied Catalysis A: General

Bifunctional catalysts based on colloidal Cu/Zn nanoparticles for the direct conversion of synthesis gas to dimethyl ether and hydrocarbons

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2018.03.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cu/Zn-based nanoparticle building units are employed for the preparation of bifunctional catalysts for syngas chemistry.

  • The effects of preparation history are reduced which enables a high comparability of the bifunctional catalysts.

  • The nanoparticles are deposited on different acidic catalysts to ensure the close proximity of the two catalytic functions.

  • The active catalyst phase is monitored by in situ and operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy.

  • The Cu loading, the Cu to acidic sites ratio and the accessibility of acid sites influence activity and selectivity to DME or hydrocarbons.

Abstract

Hybrid catalysts were prepared using well-defined, colloidal Cu/Zn-based nanoparticles as building units. The nanoparticles were immobilized on acidic supports (i.e., γ-Al2O3, HZSM-5, and HY) to yield a series of bifunctional catalysts with a close proximity of active sites for both methanol synthesis and its further conversion to dimethyl ether (DME) or hydrocarbons (HCs). By this model kit principle, a high comparability of the bifunctional catalysts was ensured. The catalysts were characterized in depth regarding their structure and catalytic performance in the conversion of CO-rich synthesis gas. In situ XAS studies demonstrated the formation of the active phase under reducing conditions. The present study revealed important material parameters to control activity and selectivity of the bifunctional catalysts either towards DME or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) products in the direct conversion of simulated biomass-derived synthesis gas. In particular, Cu loading, pore structure and Si:Al ratio were investigated.

Introduction

A promising route to second generation biofuels comprises the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to synthesis gas via gasification, and subsequent upgrading to valuable products [1,2]. In this context, the syntheses of DME or hydrocarbons via the methanol route are particularly interesting. Apart from its direct use for domestic applications or as a clean diesel fuel, DME is applied as an intermediate, e.g., in the production of further base chemicals and gasoline range hydrocarbons. Traditionally, DME is produced from syngas in a two-step process, where methanol is generated over Cu-based catalysts in the first stage, followed by subsequent dehydration over inorganic solid acids (e.g., γ-Al2O3 or zeolites) in the second stage. Alternatively, DME can be obtained in a single-step conversion from syngas which involves the following reactions:CO+2H2CH3OH2CH3OH​​​CH3OCH3+H2OCO+H2OCO2+H2

In addition, DME production from syngas is thermodynamically favored over methanol and enables higher CO conversions. The overall conversion of syngas-to-DME (STD) is described by Eq. (4).3CO+3H2CH3OCH3+CO2

Gasification of biomass-derived feedstocks provides syngas with a H2:CO ratio in the range of 0.7–1.0 which is below the optimum ratio for methanol synthesis (Eq. (1)) [2,3]. In the present study, CO-rich syngas (CO:H2 ratio 1:1) was employed to simulate biomass-derived feedstocks for the STD process (Eq. (4)).

The STD process has many technical and economic advantages, provided that a suitable catalyst exists. Typically, the two catalysts are combined by simple physical mixing [4,5]. Cu/ZnO (Al2O3) is industrially applied as a catalyst in methanol synthesis and has also been used as the methanol active component in the STD process for several years [[6], [7], [8]]. The ideal solid acid catalyst for methanol dehydration should exhibit appropriate acid sites, high stability, hydrophobic surface, low cost, high activity, and good selectivity for the desired products. In particular, alumina and zeolites have been employed for methanol dehydration to DME [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]. γ-Al2O3 is known as a very efficient dehydration catalyst with high DME selectivity, low cost, excellent lifetime, and high mechanical resistance. The surface of γ-Al2O3 remains with an excess of positive charge which is compensated by hydroxyl anions (OH). The hydroxyl anions form weakly acidic sites but desorption at high temperatures creates coordinatively unsaturated metal cations and oxygen anions that can act as Lewis acid and base sites, respectively. Although the cubic, defect spinel-type γ-Al2O3 reveals a remarkable selectivity to DME, zeolites have been reported to exhibit better catalytic activity and stability. In this context, H-ZSM-5 is of particular interest since it combines strong acidity, high density of acid sites and medium size pores which prevent coking without significantly hindering the diffusion of molecules involved in the DME synthesis. In zeolites, the number of acid sites for methanol dehydration can be further adjusted via the Si/Al ratio. In contrast to γ-Al2O3, molecular sieves (e.g., SAPO-34, HY, H-ZSM-5) can be further employed in hybrid catalysts for the production of hydrocarbons from syngas where, due to a so-called “drain-off” mechanism, no thermodynamic constraints are imposed on the overall syngas feed conversion.

The design of catalysts remains a crucial issue for enhancing catalytic efficiency. In the STD process, the large distance between the two catalytically active sites, a rather low activity, and low long-term stability have been described as the major drawbacks of physically mixed catalytic systems [14]. Diffusion of intermediates (e.g. methanol) through the interface between methanol synthesis catalyst and acid functions is an essential part of the reaction scheme and synergistic effects were observed for single bifunctional entities, if the two catalytically active components were finely dispersed and maintained in close contact [15,16]. A conventional bifunctional catalyst can be prepared by mixed metal impregnation, co-precipitation impregnation, or co-precipitation sedimentation of the dehydration catalyst [[15], [16], [17], [18]]. However, the features and activity of the bifunctional catalyst strongly depend on the preparation history. They often exhibit complex structures with broad size and shape distributions of the active particles impeding fundamental studies on the influence of the various structural parameters on the catalytic performance [19,20]. In this context, catalysts derived from well-defined nanoparticle building units may help to reduce this complexity and to contribute to a more fundamental understanding [20,21]. Colloidal nanoparticles have been employed as quasi-homogeneous catalysts for liquid-phase methanol and DME synthesis by dispersing the nanoparticles in the reaction medium [[22], [23], [24], [25], [26]]. Here, long-chain surfactants or ligands are typically adsorbed on the nanoparticle surface to prevent agglomeration, which influences the catalytic properties of the particles. Following the precursor concept, the nanoparticles are immobilized on the support and subsequently converted into heterogeneous catalysts with a nanoscale proximity of the particles and the support [[27], [28], [29]].

In general, catalyst studies can often suffer from limited comparability due to differences in their preparation history. Preparation of catalysts typically requires individually optimized synthetic recipes, and the resulting differences in homogeneity, dispersion etc. may additionally complicate the comparison of the catalyst performance. In our approach, the bifunctional catalysts were prepared based on well-defined, colloidal nanoparticle building units, thus providing a flexible toolkit to minimize the influence of differences in preparation histories. Uniform nanoparticles obtained via a colloidal, organometallic approach were employed as a precursor for the methanol active component and subsequently supported on a solid acid, namely γ-Al2O3 and zeolites of different acidity (i.e., HY and H-ZSM-5 with varying Al/Si ratio). This versatile approach to produce bifunctional model catalysts allowed a comparative study of the respective dehydration catalysts in the conversion of syngas. In particular, the effects of Cu loading, pore structure and Si:Al ratio were investigated. The catalysts were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), ammonia desorption (NH3-TPD), N2-physisorption, temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and in situ and operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). The catalytic performance was evaluated in a continuously operated laboratory scale plant using simulated biomass-derived synthesis gas between 250 and 300 °C and correlated with structural parameters of the bifunctional catalysts.

Section snippets

Materials

All chemicals were used without further purification. Unless specified otherwise, all nanoparticle synthesis steps were carried out under argon atmosphere and water-free conditions. Copper(II) acetylacetonate (Cu(acac)2, Sigma Aldrich, ≥99.9% trace metal basis), diethylzinc ((C2H5)2Zn, Sigma Aldrich, ≥52 wt.-% Zn), toluene (Sigma Aldrich, 99.8%), ethanol (VWR, absolute) were used for nanoparticle synthesis. Zeolites (ZSM-5: CBV3024E, CBV 5524G, CBV 28,014 (nominal cation form ammonium); HY: CBV

Catalyst preparation and characterization

Well-defined Cu/Zn-based nanoparticles were employed as precursors for the methanol active component and successively supported on a solid acid to yield a series of bifunctional catalysts exhibiting close proximity of the two catalytically active sites.

By this model kit principle, a high comparability of the respective bifunctional catalysts was ensured (Fig. 1). The reaction of (C2H5)2Zn with Cu(acac)2 yielded well defined, uniform Cu/Zn-based nanoparticles with a narrow size distribution. The

Conclusions

Bifunctional model catalysts were developed for the conversion of syngas to DME and hydrocarbons using the precursor concept. Well-defined and uniform Cu/Zn nanoparticles were prepared and successively immobilized on different dehydration catalysts to study the influence of the acidic properties on the catalytic performance. In particular, the Cu loading, the type of acidic sites (γ-Al2O3 vs. zeolites), the type of acid catalyst (HY vs. HZSM-5) and different Si/Al ratios were investigated.

Acknowledgements

M.G. kindly acknowledges financial support of the Helmholtz Research School Energy-Related Catalysis. Further acknowledgments are given to the synchrotron radiation source at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology for providing beamtime at CAT-ACT beamline and Dr. Anna Zimina and Dr. Tim Prüßmann for their support during the measurements. Doreen Neumann-Walter and Dr. Thomas Otto are acknowledged for their support with the BET measurements.

References (58)

  • P. Lv et al.

    Renew. Energy

    (2007)
  • D. Mao et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2009)
  • F.S. Ramos et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2005)
  • J.-D. Grunwaldt et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2000)
  • M. Stiefel et al.

    Fuel Process Technol.

    (2011)
  • J. Abu-Dahrieh et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2012)
  • J.-H. Kim et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2004)
  • T. Takeguchi et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2000)
  • Q. Ge et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (1998)
  • J.-L. Li et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (1996)
  • C. Zeng et al.

    Fuel

    (2013)
  • R. Ahmad et al.

    Fuel Cell Proc. Technol.

    (2014)
  • G. Ertl et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1983)
  • H.-J. Freund et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2003)
  • H. Bönnemann et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (1996)
  • M. Turco et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2004)
  • J. Agrell et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2001)
  • H. Wilmer et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2003)
  • B. Lindström et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2002)
  • P. Vesborg et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2009)
  • J.H. Flores et al.

    Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects

    (2008)
  • V.V. Ordomsky et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2014)
  • E. Lorenz et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2016)
  • J.-H. Kim et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2004)
  • M. Cai et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2016)
  • J. Yoshihara et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1996)
  • N. Dahmen et al.

    Chem. Ing. Tech.

    (2010)
  • E. Dinjus et al.

    RCS Green Chemistry No. 4

    (2009)
  • A. Mittasch, M. Pier, US 1569775 A,...
  • Cited by (10)

    • Catalyst deactivation in the direct synthesis of dimethyl ether from syngas over CuO/ZnO/Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> and Γ-Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> mechanical mixtures

      2018, Fuel Processing Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most typical hybrid catalysts are prepared by mechanical mixing. Bifunctional catalysts are usually prepared by methods as coprecipitation, impregnation, sol-gel, or other chemical methods (e.g. colloidal approach [15], capsule [16] or confining of copper nanoparticles within the zeolite matrix [17] and core-shell catalysts [18, 19]). The CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst is currently used as commercial catalyst for methanol synthesis and, hence, has been deeply proposed for one-step DME synthesis.

    • An intermetallic Pd<inf>2</inf>Ga nanoparticle catalyst for the single-step conversion of CO-rich synthesis gas to dimethyl ether

      2018, Applied Catalysis A: General
      Citation Excerpt :

      This Cu/ZnO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst (12 wt.- % Cu) was prepared from colloidal, Cu/Zn-based nanoparticles using a similar synthetic procedure and was used as a reference [25,26]. The reaction rate based on moles of metal was 0.46 mmolCO∙s−1∙molPd−1 for the Pd/Ga-based catalyst at 250 °C and thus, higher than the conventional Cu/Zn-based reference catalyst (0.37 mmolCO∙s-1∙molCu-1).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text