Elsevier

Applied Catalysis A: General

Volume 449, 27 December 2012, Pages 105-111
Applied Catalysis A: General

Hydrotreatment of sunflower oil using supported molybdenum carbide

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.09.030Get rights and content

Abstract

Pure sunflower oil was hydrotreated (T = 633 K, P = 5 MPa) aiming the production of a biofuel in the diesel range using β-Mo2C/Al2O3 as catalyst. The catalyst was synthesized in situ using the temperature-programmed carburization (TPC) methodology with a 20% (v/v) CH4/H2 gas mixture and 923 K/2 h as synthesis temperature. The catalytic evaluation results indicate that for the employed conditions n-C18 was the major product. The association of the results of the experiments without (blank) and with catalyst suggests that the overall triglyceride transformation into linear alkanes proceeds in two steps: (i) thermal cracking of the triglyceride forming free fatty acids and (ii) hydrogenation of the double bonds and of the carboxylic group of the free fatty acid forming n-alkanes. No CO and/or CO2 formation were detected implying that decarbonylation and/or decarboxylation routes do not play an important role when molybdenum carbide is used, contrarily to what is commonly observed when supported Co–Mo or Ni–Mo sulfides are employed as catalysts.

Highlights

► The activity of Mo2C/Al2O3 in the hydrotreating of sunflower oil was evaluated. ► Mo2C/Al2O3 promotes deoxygenation of the carboxyl of the free fatty acids. ► The by-product of the reaction is water. ► Little contribution of decarbonylation and decarboxylation was observed. ► Mo2C/Al2O3 is stable in reaction times greater than 150 h.

Introduction

In addition to the growing concerns regarding the increased consumption of oil products, natural gas and coal to generate all of the energy required primarily by the industrial and transportation sectors, additional concerns have arisen with respect to environmental issues, which has resulted in the creation of stricter laws worldwide. The increase in CO2 emissions from the burning of oil and coal is currently the major international concern because it allegedly contributes significantly to the greenhouse effect. In this sense, the search for alternative sources of renewable energy with minimum emissions is necessary.

Biodiesel is produced from the process of transesterification of triglycerides (vegetable oils or fats) and has been used in several countries in its pure form or mixed with petroleum diesel. The major disadvantage of this process is related to the production of large amounts of glycerol, which has significantly impacted the market of this product. If this process is effectively implemented in large countries, such as Brazil, the United States and China, or in economic regions, such as the European Community, the supply of glycerol will be so high that experts predict that there will be a collapse in the market for this product.

Several studies available in the literature show that the hydrotreating (HDT) process employed in refineries around the world can be used to obtain hydrocarbons in the range of diesel and gasoline from pure vegetable oils or from mixtures of vegetable oil and diesel using the conventional catalytic HDT technology and commercially available catalysts [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].

The vast majority of studies dealing with the processing of vegetable oils by hydrotreating have utilized the NiMo/Al2O3 sulfide catalyst [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. However, studies exploring the use of CoMo/Al2O3 [11], [12], [13], [14], Pt deposited on various supports [15], [16], [17], [18], Pd/SAPO-31 [19], commercial hydrocracking catalysts [15], [17], [19], [20], NiMoW/Al2O3 [21], [22] as well as the use of CoMo and NiMo sulfide phases on supports such as SiO2 [14], [18], MCM-41 [4], [23] and zeolites [7], [9], [11], [13], [14], [18] have also been reported.

If from one side the used of sulfide catalysts in the co-processing of vegetable oils and refinery streams is advantageous because the existing infrastructure can be used without too many modifications, from the other it is not convenient for the processing of streams of pure vegetable oil unless some sulfur is added to them in order to keep the catalysts in its active form. In fact Kubička and Horáček [14] have shown that when a CoMo/Al2O3 sulfide catalyst was used for prolonged periods of time it underwent deactivation due to the loss of sulfur from the active phase. Therefore, the addition of a sulfiding agent to the pure vegetable oil to be processed, such as CS2 or dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), is necessary to minimize catalyst deactivation. However, the addition of sulfiding agents to vegetable oil eliminates the advantage of obtaining sulfur-free biofuels because, depending on the operating conditions employed, sulfur compounds may be present in the final product [14].

Quite recently other phases than sulfides or noble metals have been explored as catalysts for the hydrodeoxygenation of vegetable oils. Amongst these new phases there are nitrides of molybdenum, vanadium and tungsten supported on γ-Al2O3 [24], molybdenum carbide supported on carbon [25], and nickel phosphide supported on SBA-15 [26]. There are several advantages on the use of these phases, the most important ones being those related to stability (no deactivation with time on stream), sulfur tolerance (allowing the processing of mixed phases of vegetable oil and diesel), and in the case of Ni2P/SiO2 a lower decarboxylation/decarbonylation ration was observed as shown by Yang et al. [26]. The lower CO2 and CO production could be an advantage for the refiners, as they are not used to deal with these gases during normal hydrotreating of oil fractions otherwise modifications in the process have to be implemented [27].

It is well known from the literature that transition metal carbides, especially those of molybdenum and tungsten, are excellent hydrotreating catalysts [28] but so far these phases have been little explored in the HDT of vegetable oils or free fatty acids (FFA). For this reason, the main objective of this work was to evaluate Mo2C/Al2O3 as catalysts in the HDT of pure commercial sunflower oil using the same reaction conditions (T, P, and WHSV) as those employed by Huber et al. [2] who have used a commercial sulfided NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst, in order to verify not only if there is any differences in conversion levels and product distribution but also to evaluate the possibility of employing molybdenum carbide as catalyst in the hydrotreating of pure vegetable oils.

Section snippets

Catalyst precursor synthesis

Al2O3 (CATAPAL A – PP1688) was used as a support for β-Mo2C. MoO3/Al2O3 samples were prepared prior to β-Mo2C/Al2O3 synthesis with a nominal content of 20 wt.% MoO3 using the incipient wetness impregnation method. Briefly, the methodology consisted of dissolving the molybdenum salt (ammonium heptamolybdate (NH4)6Mo7O24radical dot4H2O from Merck) in the smallest possible volume of water (∼2 mL) to obtain the desired MoO3 content after the calcination step. The heptamolybdate solution was dripped onto the γ-Al

Catalyst characterization

The XRF results of the 20 wt.% MoO3/Al2O3 sample indicated an oxide content of 22.45 wt.% demonstrating that the real content was close to the nominal one, thus indicating that the catalyst preparation was performed correctly.

The specific surface area (Sg) values of the support, of a bulk MoO3 sample obtained by calcining ammonium heptamolybdate at 773 K for 2 h, and of the 20 wt.% MoO3/Al2O3 sample are shown in Table 1. Bulk MoO3 presented a very low Sg value, which could not be determined because

Conclusions

The production of hydrocarbons in the gasoline and diesel range was satisfactory in the hydrotreating of sunflower oil at 633 K and a pressure of 5.0 MPa using β-Mo2C/Al2O3 as catalyst.

The analysis of the results of activity and selectivity obtained at different temperatures in the blank experiments allows to conclude that under the experimental employed conditions the thermal cracking of sunflower oil took place, regardless of the presence of catalysts. While primary thermal cracking lead to the

Acknowledgements

The authors thank CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for the financial support. L.A.S. thanks FAPERJ for the awarded scholarship.

References (37)

  • J. Gusmão et al.

    Catal. Today

    (1989)
  • G.W. Huber et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2007)
  • P. Šimáček et al.

    Fuel

    (2009)
  • P. Šimáček et al.

    Fuel

    (2010)
  • P. Šimáček et al.

    Fuel

    (2010)
  • A. Guzman et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2010)
  • P. Priecel et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2011)
  • I. Sebos et al.

    Fuel

    (2009)
  • M. Krár et al.

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • D. Kubička et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2011)
  • J. Hancsók et al.

    Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.

    (2007)
  • O.V. Kikhtyanin et al.

    Fuel

    (2010)
  • T.-R. Viljava et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2001)
  • J. Monnier et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2010)
  • B. Dhandapani et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1998)
  • A.W. Schwab et al.

    Fuel

    (1987)
  • X. Dupain et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2007)
  • B. Coq et al.

    J. Mol. Catal.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (65)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text