Elsevier

Applied Catalysis A: General

Volume 350, Issue 2, 30 November 2008, Pages 207-216
Applied Catalysis A: General

Bimetallic Pt-Metal catalysts for the decomposition of methanol: Effect of secondary metal on the oxidation state, activity, and selectivity of Pt

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.08.013Get rights and content

Abstract

We present here a study of methanol (MeOH) decomposition over a series of bimetallic Pt-M catalysts, with M = Au, Pd, Ru, Fe. All samples have the same initial size distribution (∼3 nm nanoparticle height), support (ZrO2), and preparation conditions. Therefore, differences in the electronic and catalytic properties of the samples tested are related directly to the addition of the secondary metals (M). We find that the oxidation state as well as the activity of Pt is heavily influenced by the addition of the secondary metal. PtO is found to be highly stable in these systems and increasing concentrations of metallic Pt are associated with the surface segregation of metal M due to its affinity for the oxygen present during air annealing.

Graphical abstract

We present a study of methanol decomposition over ZrO2-supported bimetallic Pt0.8M0.2 nanocatalysts (∼3 nm), with M = Au, Pd, Ru, Fe. The oxidation state and the activity of Pt was found to be heavily influenced by the addition of the secondary metal. Segregation trends upon annealing in air are discussed.

Introduction

Pt-Metal (Pt-M) bimetallic catalysts are important in a variety of applications ranging from fuel cells [1] to thermal coatings [2]. In addition, recent years have witnessed a surge in the interest of methanol (MeOH), especially as a potential storage fuel for hydrogen, ultimately used for the production of electricity in on-board applications such as the direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC), portable electronics, or stationary power generation. These applications potentially involve electro-oxidation, steam reforming, and the direct decomposition of MeOH, each encompassing unique reaction conditions [3].

In order to take advantage of Pt-M systems in the design of new catalysts for any of these applications, the structural, chemical, and electronic modifications, brought about by the addition of secondary metals [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], need to be fully understood. In particular, the surface compositions of such catalysts are influenced by a number of factors. Besides such familiar properties as surface energy, atomic volume, and heats of sublimation, nanoscale systems require additional considerations. For instance, it has been shown theoretically that Pt atoms may preferentially segregate to sites of low (edges, vertices, etc.) or high (facets) coordination depending on the structure of the particles as well as the metal M [12]. In addition, the presence of oxygen has been shown to heavily influence atomic segregation in nanoparticles (NPs), and the presence of metal M on the NP surface can affect the stability of oxide species on active nanocatalysts [13], [14]. In reference to fuel cells, alloying Pt with metals such as Fe, Ru, Ni, Co, as well as others, has been reported to enhance the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) [5], [6], increase activity [15], and enhance resistance to CO poisoning [16]. In connection with the latter, Pt-Ru catalysts are known to be efficient and some detailed theoretical studies already exist concerning this catalyst’s role in CO oxidation [17]. However, as stated earlier, these systems hold importance in a broader sense than power generation alone [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32] and a large number of works have been dedicated to understanding their synthesis, characterization, and catalytic properties [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44]

Furthermore, with the ever increasing industrial use of nanomaterials, their impact on the environment has become an issue of great importance. Specifically, thermally or mechanically induced emissions of particulate Pt from automobile catalytic converters is a source of toxicological concern [45], [46], [47], [48]. Therefore, not only are the activity, selectivity, and stability of the working catalysts important, but so also is the state in which they might be emitted into the environment upon reaction (oxidated, chlorinated, etc.). Although catalysts are prepared in a certain state (i.e. Pt0), the oxidation state of the working catalyst might be different, and how this state evolves and reacts under environmental conditions is of interest.

In general, it is the surface properties of alloys which are credited with observed catalytic improvements, and as we will show in this article, the nature of the secondary metal, as well as the preparation and pretreatment conditions, have a large influence over the final composition and oxidation state of the surface and its active components. We present here an investigation of the influence that the addition of M = Au, Pd, Ru, and Fe has on the oxidation state, activity, and selectivity of supported Pt0.8M0.2 nanoparticles. We use as a probe reaction the decomposition of MeOH. Previous studies by our group [49], [50] have shown that the size of Pt nanoparticle catalysts, as well as the particle support, can influence the type (PtO, PtO2) and stability of the metal oxide shell present in “real-world” catalysts under realistic reaction conditions. Indeed, there has been recent interest in the role of oxidized versus metallic species in the activity of several systems where oxidized metals may contain some catalytic advantage [51], [52]. To remove any ambiguities in the present study, we have used particles of the same average size for all samples and a common support, zirconia. Under these conditions the observed effects can be directly related to the addition of the secondary metal.

Section snippets

Experimental

Non-polar/polar diblock copolymers [poly(styrene)-block-poly(2vinylpyridine) Polymer Source Inc.] were dissolved in a non-polar solvent (toluene) in order to obtain spherical nano-cages (inverse micelles). These micelles were then loaded with metal salts (H2PtCl6·6H2O, HAuCl4·3H2O, RuCl3, PdCl2, FeCl3) to produce self-confined and size-selected Metal and Pt-Metal (Pt-M) NPs. The metal content of all bimetallic samples by weight (wt) was 80% Pt and 20% secondary metal. The particle size was

Morphological and structural characterization

Fig. 1 displays representative images of the nanoparticle polymeric solutions dip-coated on SiO2/Si(0 0 1). Here the three images show bimetallic samples [Pt-Au (a), Pt-Pd (b), and Pt-Fe (c)] before the removal of the polymeric shell. The images demonstrate the validity of our preparation method for the synthesis of bimetallic catalysts with narrow size distributions. Analysis of the images taken after the removal of the polymer (not shown), by heating in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) for 30 min at 500 

Stability and reactivity of PtO

The monometallic Pt sample (Fig. 3, Table 1) is composed mainly of PtO (Pt2+, 63%) as well as a fairly large (28%) contribution from the metallic component (Pt0), with PtO2 (Pt4+) being considerably smaller (9%). The heats of oxide formation of PtO and PtO2 [67] and theoretical calculations [89], indicate that PtO2 should be the more stable oxide. However, possibly due to strong metal–support interactions, previously confirmed for this system [50], PtO is the most prevalent species under our

Conclusions

We have tested a series of monometallic (M) and bimetallic (Pt-M) nanocatalysts for the decomposition of MeOH. All catalysts had the same initial particle size distribution, support, and preparation conditions. We therefore attribute any differences in the properties of these catalysts to the addition of the secondary metals. XPS analysis reveals the most stable component of these systems to be PtO, which proves to be highly stable under our reaction conditions. XPS, in conjunction with

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Perla Balbuena (Texas A&M) and Prof. Werner Keune (Univ. Duisburg-Essen) for helpful discussions. This work has been partially supported by the US Department of Energy (DE-FG02-08ER15995). Funding from the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (supplement to grant PRF-42701-G5 for minority undergraduate summer research) and the National Science Foundation (NSF-REU, EEC 0453436) is greatly appreciated.

References (102)

  • F. Wu et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2004)
  • U.A. Paulus et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2002)
  • V.A. Lubarda

    Mech. Mater.

    (2003)
  • S. Shukla et al.

    Nanostruct. Mater.

    (1999)
  • G.F. Wang et al.

    Prog. Surf. Sci.

    (2005)
  • G.E. Ramirez-Caballero et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2008)
  • T. Toda et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1999)
  • S. Desai et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2003)
  • Q. Yi et al.

    Electrochem. Comm.

    (2007)
  • A. Morlang et al.

    Appl. Catal. B-Environ.

    (2005)
  • W. Rachmady et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2002)
  • M. Bowker et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2004)
  • S.E. Maisuls et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2001)
  • K.K. Bando et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2006)
  • J.R. Kitchin et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2003)
  • K. Endo et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2004)
  • A. Niquille-Rothlisberger et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2007)
  • D.A. Simonetti et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2007)
  • O.S. Alexeev et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2000)
  • W. Huang et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2007)
  • M. Englisch et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (1997)
  • N. Taylor et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2001)
  • T.N. Taylor et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1993)
  • J.A. Rodriguez et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1992)
  • R. Zeis et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2007)
  • Y. Shu et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2008)
  • J.C. Serrano-Ruiz et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2006)
  • O. Ozturk et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2007)
  • H.B. Zhao et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2005)
  • A.L. Bonivardi et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1996)
  • T. Ruhle

    Appl. Catal. B

    (1997)
  • M. Peuckert et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1984)
  • M. Schmid et al.

    Environ. Int.

    (2007)
  • W. Li et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2005)
  • L.K. Ono et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2006)
  • A.S. Arico et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2001)
  • A.K. Shukla et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2001)
  • A. Howard et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2002)
  • E. Antolini et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2008)
  • K.F. Wojciechowski

    Surf. Sci.

    (1999)
  • L. Guczi

    Catal. Today

    (2005)
  • Y.G. Ma et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2008)
  • E. Irissou et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2005)
  • Z. Bastl et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2004)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    Science

    (2007)
  • U.B. Demirci

    J. Power Sources

    (2007)
  • J.W. Niemantsverdriet et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1985)
  • P. Waszczuk et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2002)
  • R. Blume et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2007)
  • H. Iida et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2006)
  • Cited by (137)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text