The effect of pre- and post-mating dietary restriction on embryonic survival in gilts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.06.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • There was no interaction between the pre-mating and post-mating feeding levels on embryo survival in gilts.

  • Feed intake prior to mating had no effect on embryo survival in gilts.

  • Low feeding levels post-mating decreased embryo survival when compared to higher post-mating feeding levels.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine if pre- and post-mating feeding levels interact to affect embryonic survival, and to determine whether feeding to the maintenance requirement would impair embryo survival. Gilts were allocated to a pre-mating treatment of 1 or 0.8× energy maintenance from day 1 to 14 of their oestrous cycle prior to mating. From day 15 to mating all gilts were group housed and fed ad lib. Gilts were artificially inseminated at their third oestrus. The day after mating, gilts were group housed and allocated to post-mating treatments of 1.5 or 1× maintenance. Gilts were slaughtered day 25.5 ± 0.2 post-insemination and reproductive tracts collected. Gilts fed the restricted pre-mating diet lost significantly more weight than gilts fed the increased pre-mating diet (6.7 ± 0.8 versus 3.7 ± 0.7 kg). From mating to slaughter, gilts fed the restricted post-mating diet lost 0.5 ± 1.02 kg liveweight, while gilts fed the increased post-mating diet gained 5.7 ± 0.90 kg liveweight (P < 0.05). The pre-mating dietary treatment had no effect on any reproductive measure. Embryonic survival was greater (P < 0.05) in gilts fed the high post-mating diet compared with gilts fed the low post-mating diet (88.4 ± 2.5 versus 77.8 ± 4.0%), resulting in more (P < 0.05) conceptuses present (14.0 ± 0.6 versus 11.7 ± 0.7). There was no interaction between pre-mating and post-mating feed intake on any reproductive measure. These data demonstrated that reducing post-mating feed intakes to maintenance levels impaired embryo survival.

Introduction

Group housing during gestation potentially improves sow welfare by allowing freedom of movement, increased socialisation and increased capacity to express natural behaviours. However, there are a number of negative aspects associated with group housing systems including competition for resources and a resultant variation in feed intake (Kongsted, 2005) with low ranking sows thought to receive less feed than their higher ranking counterparts (Andersen et al., 1999).

Changes in feed intake affect ovarian function directly via the effect of metabolic hormones on ovarian follicle growth, or indirectly via changes in the pattern and concentration of gonadotrophin release (van Wettere and Hughes, 2007). Feed restriction prior to mating decreased embryonic survival in gilts and lactating sows, most likely due to impaired follicular development, oocyte quality and luteal function (Almeida et al., 2000, Zak et al., 1997b). Feed restriction during the late luteal phase (days 8–15) of the oestrous cycle preceeding mating had the greatest negative effect on embryonic survival (Almeida et al., 2000).

Although litter size was similar between sows fed at a moderate or high level post-mating (Quesnel et al., 2010), more severe feed restriction such as below maintenance has been shown to be detrimental to embryonic survival, with a moderate feed restriction of 1.2× maintenance during early pregnancy resulting in significantly greater embryonic survival rates compared with that of the more severe feed restriction of 0.6 times maintenance in gilts (De et al., 2009). It is, therefore, suggested that sows experiencing a restricted feed intake post mating may experience impaired reproductive performance. This effect may be seen in low ranking sows, such as first parity sows, in a group housing system where competition for feed exists (Kongsted, 2005). An association between reduced feed intake during early gestation in group housed sows and impaired reproduction has been proposed, with the likelihood of pregnancy loss or low litter sizes increased with decreased backfat gain between weaning and day 21 post-mating (Kongsted, 2006).

The interaction between feed intake pre-mating and post-mating on embryo survival and litter size has received little attention. Ashworth et al. (1999) observed decreased embryonic survival rates in gilts receiving a maintenance feed intake before and after mating compared with those fed at three times maintenance. However, these authors only looked at embryonic survival to day 12 and it is known that the majority of embryonic mortality occurs during the implantation period (days 12–18; Geisert and Schmitt, 2002). Therefore, it is not known whether the effect on embryonic survival of a restricted feed intake post mating experienced by a group housed low ranking parity one sow is likely to be greater in those sows that were previously metabolically challenged from lactation.

Using an established gilt model for a lactating sow (Almeida et al., 2000, Chen et al., 2012) we hypothesise that there will be an interaction between the pre-mating and post-mating feed intake on embryonic survival.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

This experiment was conducted at the University of Adelaide's piggery, South Australia, with approval from the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Adelaide. The experimental design was a 2 × 2 factorial randomised block design with main effects being feeding level from day 1 to day 14 of the second oestrous cycle (0.8× maintenance; low, n = 23 vs. 1× maintenance; high, n = 23) and feeding level from mating until slaughter (1× maintenance; LOW, n = 23) vs. 1.5× maintenance; HIGH, n = 23).

Growth characteristics

Gilt liveweight was not different at detection of second oestrus among treatment groups (Table 2). During the pre-mating treatment period, gilts in the low group lost more weight than those in the high group (6.7 ± 0.8 versus 3.7 ± 0.7 kg; P < 0.05). Liveweight changes from day 14 of the second oestrous cycle to insemination were similar among treatment groups, with all treatments gaining weight. During this period there was a significant interaction, with low×LOW gilt gaining more backfat than

Discussion

The current investigation demonstrated that there was no interaction between the pre-mating and post-mating feed intake on embryonic survival, and that the post-mating feed intake had a greater effect on embryonic survival than the pre-mating feed intake. Ashworth et al. (1999) reported no interaction between the pre-mating and post-mating feed intake on embryonic survival to day 12 of gestation, agreeing with the present findings. However, in contrast to the present data, Ashworth et al. (1999)

Conclusions

This study has identified that there was no significant interaction between pre-mating and post-mating feed intake on embryonic survival. Within the limit of this study, the pre-mating feed intake had little effect on embryonic survival. However, feeding less post-mating decreased embryonic survival when compared with greater post-mating feeding levels, demonstrating the importance of ensuring sows receive adequate post-mating nutrition.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The scholarship for this project was provided by the Pork Cooperative Research Centre. We acknowledge Paul Herde, Kate Plush, Alice Weaver and Robyn Terry for their technical and statistical assistance throughout the study.

References (22)

  • S.K. Baidoo et al.

    Effect of feed-intake during lactation and after weaning on sow reproductive-performance

    Can. J. Anim. Sci.

    (1992)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Feed intake and feeding behaviour traits of gestating sows are associated with undesirable outcomes

      2021, Livestock Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Higher feed levels may be beneficial for sows that have higher ovulation rates. This result agrees with Kirkwood et al. (1990) and Condous et al. (2014), who reported that sows restrictively fed during lactation and in the first 25 days of gestation typically have lower embryo survival. Conversely, in late gestation (after day 90), large litter size might physically limit a sow's ability to eat her full allocation, such that a higher density diet might be beneficial.

    • Effects of post-insemination energy content of feed on embryonic survival in pigs: A systematic review

      2019, Animal Reproduction Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is still no consensus whether feed intake should be restricted in pork production enterprises following breeding to reduce embryonic death. The feeding of diets with greater energy content than that needed for body maintenance during early pregnancy has been reported to have deleterious effects (Den Hartog and Van Kempen, 1980; Jindal et al., 1996; De et al., 2009), while results from other studies indicate there is no negative effect (Pharazyn et al., 1991; Gerritsen et al., 2008; Quesnel et al., 2010), and in some studies there have been beneficial effects (Condous et al., 2014; Che et al., 2015). The majority of embryonic death occurs during the second and third weeks of gestation (Bazer and Johnson, 2014).

    • Feeding strategies in pig production: Sows and their piglets

      2017, Animal Feed Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In any case, ideally, feed intake curve along gestation should somehow mimic the pattern of the ME requirements (Fig. 1), and to achieve this many different theoretical feed intake curves may be found in the literature (Dourmad et al., 1994; Boyd et al., 2000; Prunier et al., 2001). In fact, each farm may have its own approach depending on many factors; for instance, nowadays for hyperprolific sows or when sows finish lactation in a low body condition, the feed restriction post-mating may be shortened to a few days or even avoided, since embryo survival do not seem to be affected (Condous et al., 2014) or, depending on the group-housing system used, it would be highly desirable to recover lactation losses mainly along the first month of gestation. Ideally, a broader phase-feeding program should be recommended for both, to better fit the nutrient requirements of the sow and to easily combine different strategies with further effects post-birth, mainly thinking about late gestation to further improve the startup of piglets after birth and carry-over effect till the end of the suckling period.

    View full text