Elsevier

Anaerobe

Volume 47, October 2017, Pages 94-103
Anaerobe

C.difficile (including epidemiology)
A combination of the probiotic and prebiotic product can prevent the germination of Clostridium difficile spores and infection

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.03.019Get rights and content

Highlights

  • For prevention of C. difficile infection (CDI) a synbiotic product comprising Lactobacillus plantarum Inducia and prebiotic xylitol was applied.

  • The synbiotic composition suppressed growth of different C. difficile strains of Estonian and Norwegian origin in vitro.

  • The synbiotic composition fully stopped the germination of C. difficile VPI 10463 reference strain in vitro.

  • The prefeeding of synbiotic prevented the death of experimental hamsters and colonization of the gut with C. difficile.

  • The possibility to apply the synbiotic during antimicrobial treatment for prevention of CDI and its recurrencies is suggested.

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most prevalent healthcare associated infections in hospitals and nursing homes. Different approaches are used for prevention of CDI. Absence of intestinal lactobacilli and bifidobacteria has been associated with C. difficile colonization in hospitalized patients.

Our aim was to test a) the susceptibility of C. difficile strains of different origin and the intestinal probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Inducia (DSM 21379) to various antimicrobial preparations incl. metronidazole, vancomycin; b) the susceptibility of C. difficile strains to antagonistic effects of the probiotic L. plantarum Inducia, prebiotic xylitol (Xyl) and their combination as a synbiotic (Syn) product; c) the suppression of germination of C. difficile spores in vitro and in vivo in animal model of C. difficile infection with Inducia, Xyl and Syn treatment. The VPI strain 10463 (ATCC 43255), epidemic strain (M 13042) and clinical isolates (n = 12) of C. difficile from Norway and Estonia were susceptible and contrarily L. plantarum Inducia resistant to vancomycin, metronidazole and ciprofloxacin. The intact cells of Inducia, natural and neutralized cell free supernatant inhibited in vitro the growth of tested C. difficile reference strain VPI and Estonian and Norwegian clinical isolates of C. difficile after co-cultivation. This effect against C. difficile sustained in liquid media under ampicillin (0.75 μg/ml) and Xyl (5%) application. Further, incubation of Inducia in the media with 5% Xyl fully stopped germination of spores of C. difficile VPI strain after 48 h. In infection model the 48 hamsters were administered ampicillin (30 mg/kg) and 10–30 spores of C. difficile VPI strain. They also received five days before and after the challenge a pretreatment with a synbiotic (single daily dose of L. plantarum Inducia 1 ml of 1010 CFU/ml and 20% xylitol in 1 ml by orogastric gavage). The survival rate of hamsters was increased to 78% compared to 13% (p = 0.003) survival rate of hamsters who received no treatment. When administered Xyl the survival rate of hamsters reached 56% vs.13% (p = 0.06). In both Syn (6/9, p = 0.003) and Xyl (3/9, p = 0.042) groups the number of animals not colonized with C. difficile significantly increased.

In conclusion, the combination of xylitol with L. plantarum Inducia suppresses the germination of spores and outgrowth into vegetative toxin producing cells of C. difficile and reduces the colonization of gut with the pathogen. Putative therapeutical approach includes usage of the synbiotic during antimicrobial therapy for prevention of CDI and its potential to reduce recurrences of CDI.

Introduction

Clostridium difficile is a gram-positive rod, spore forming anaerobic bacillus and is part of the normal intestinal microbiota. First discovered in 1935 [1] the C. difficile was identified as a cause of pseudomembranous colitis in humans at 1978 [2]. The less severe disorder caused by this bacterium is C. difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD). C. difficile is the cause of approximately 25–30% of all cases of AAD, exposing it as one of the most prevalent healthcare associated infections in hospitals and nursing homes [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. It is defined as diarrhea occurring two hours to two months after use of antibiotics [4]. C. difficile infection (CDI) symptoms vary amongst patients, ranging from mild to severe cases. The latter may result in toxic megacolon or death. Symptomatic recurrence of CDI occurs in approximately 20% of patients and they can be characterized with increasing age, initial disease severity and hospital exposure [8], [9].

C. difficile infections can currently be controlled by using antibiotic therapy either vancomycin (complicated disease) or metronidazole (mild disease) [10]. Concerning healthcare associated CDI, especially due to the relapses and re-infections, it is necessary to check the susceptibility of C. difficile strains of different origin to special antimicrobials.

The high spread of the intestinal pathogen in hospitals and nursing homes is associated with massive amounts of endospores of high environmental resistance [11], [12]. In order to cause disease, these spores must infect a person, germinate and return to growth of vegetative cells in intestinal tract. Further, the disease pathogenesis involves the actions of secreted toxins, which are produced by vegetative cells, not by spores [13]. Different metabolites of intestinal microbiota may intervene into CDI pathogenesis to stop germination of C. difficile spores. The alternative therapies have suggested the application of intestinal beneficial bacteria in form of probiotics or fecal transplants [14] especially in recurrent infections for correction of the intestinal imbalance e.g. dysbiosis [15], [16], [17].

Disruption of intestinal microecological balance due to antimicrobial treatment is a key factor in the pathogenesis of C. difficile colonization and disease [4], [7], [18]. Absence of intestinal lactobacilli and bifidobacteria has been associated with C. difficile colonization in hospitalized patients [19], [20]. Previous studies for prevention of CDI with probiotics suggest combinations of lactobacilli such as L. acidophilus and L. casei [21], or L. rhamnosus [22], [23]. The ingested probiotics mostly act by stabilizing the gut microbiota and maintaining colonization resistance by prevention of settlement of C. difficile or binding its toxins [24], [25]. The synbiotic (combination of probiotic and prebiotic compounds) may reduce the favorability of the environment for C. difficile.

Prebiotic xylitol is a 5-C sugar alcohol, e.g. pentitol, and is detected in plants, fungi and algae. It is an important intermediate product in carbohydrate metabolism found also in human blood. Xylitol stimulates the growth and activities of some species of microbiota in the large intestines [26]. In the studies on CACO-2 cell lines xylitol prevented the adhesion of vegetative cells of C. difficile reference strain VPI 10463, seemingly blocking the receptors on cells.

However, effective application of antagonistic beneficial bacteria (Lactobacillus spp. probiotic products) against C. difficile substantially depend of strain specificity of applied lactobacillus strain, but also of the used reference strain of C difficile [27]. The strain Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 21379 acronym Inducia® has several beneficial properties: produces H2O2, has strong antioxidative potential and moderate bile salt hydrolase activity. It reduces the level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol in blood and the oxidative stress level of human body [28], [29].

Our aim was to test a) the susceptibility of C. difficile strains of different origin and the intestinal probiotic L. plantarum Inducia to various antimicrobial preparations incl. metronidazole, vancomycin; b) the susceptibility of C. difficile strains to antagonistic effects of the probiotic L. plantarum strain Inducia, prebiotic xylitol (Xyl), and their combination as a synbiotic product (Syn); c) the suppression of germination of C. difficile spores in vitro and in animal model of C. difficile infection with Inducia, Xyl and Syn treatment.

Section snippets

Bacterial C. difficile strains

Following Clostridium difficile strains were used in the study: reference strain VPI 10463 (ATCC 43255), strain M 13042 (epidemic strain from Canada belonging to ribotype 027) [30] and 12 clinical isolates. Clinical isolates originated from Estonian (E, E1-E5) and Norwegian patients (N, N1-N5) with clinically diagnosed CDAD [31], [32]. The clinical isolates were identified using bacteriological and molecular methods (Real-Time PCR for identification, capillary gel electrophoresis-based PCR for

Susceptibility to antibiotics of L. plantarum Inducia and C. difficile strains

L. plantarum Inducia was resistant to metronidazole and vancomycin, antibiotics most frequently used in CDI treatment, and to ciprofloxacin, antibiotic associated with CDI pathogenesis (Table 1); European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Clinical breakpoints – (bacteria (v 6.0) 2016. http://www.eucast.org/). At the same time Inducia was susceptible to ampicillin (MIC 0.19 μg/ml), the antibiotic used in our animal experiments.

All reference and tested clinical isolates of

Discussion

In this study we have experimentally proved the possibilities for prevention of antimicrobial treatment associated Clostridium difficile infection and its recurrences. The suppressive effects of pro-, pre- and synbiotic compounds on C. difficile vegetative cells and spores were elucidated. The obtained in vitro results were successfully applied for suppression of the germination of C. difficile spores outgrowth into toxin producing vegetative cells in an animal C. difficile infection model,

Acknowledgments

The research was co-financed by EU Regional Development Fund under Projects EU30002 and EU 48686 Healthy Food of the Bio-Competence Centre of Healthy Dairy Products LLC, Europe financial mechanisms and Norway financial mechanism (EMP 13), Estonian Science Foundation (grant No. 7933), Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (grant No. KOGU-HUMB). We appreciate the critical reading and helpful suggestions by Irja Lutsar.

References (58)

  • M. Mikelsaar

    Human microbial ecology: lactobacilli, probiotics, selective decontamination

    Anaerobe

    (2011)
  • E.R. Dubberke

    Prevalence of Clostridium difficile environmental contamination and strain variability in multiple health care facilities

    Am. J. Infect. Control

    (2007)
  • J.K. Spinler

    Administration of probiotic kefir to mice with Clostridium difficile infection exacerbates disease

    Anaerobe

    (2016)
  • C. Badet

    Adaptation of salivary Lactobacillus strains to xylitol

    Arch. Oral Biol.

    (2004)
  • M.C. Ammons

    Combined treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm with lactoferrin and xylitol inhibits the ability of bacteria to respond to damage resulting from lactoferrin iron chelation

    Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents

    (2011)
  • I.C. Hall et al.

    Intestinal flora in new-born infants: with a description of a new pathogenic anaerobe, Bacillus difficiles

    Am. J. Dis. Child.

    (1935)
  • J.G. Bartlett

    Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis due to toxin-producing clostridia

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1978)
  • S.H. Cohen

    Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA)

    Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.

    (2010)
  • M. Goudarzi

    Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, and therapeutic options

    Sci. (Cairo)

    (2014)
  • K.E. Burke et al.

    Clostridium difficile infection: a worldwide disease

    Gut Liver

    (2014)
  • D.D. Depestel et al.

    Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection

    J. Pharm. Pract.

    (2013)
  • D.W. Eyre

    Predictors of first recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection: implications for initial management

    Clin. Infect. Dis.

    (2012)
  • N. Bagdasarian et al.

    Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review

    JAMA

    (2015)
  • A. Rodriguez-Palacios et al.

    Moist-heat resistance, spore aging, and superdormancy in Clostridium difficile

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2011)
  • L.P. Schenck et al.

    Gastrointestinal dysbiosis and the use of fecal microbial transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection

    World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol.

    (2015)
  • M. Hickson

    Probiotics in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and Clostridium difficile infection

    Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol.

    (2011)
  • F. Rohlke et al.

    Fecal microbiota transplantation in relapsing Clostridium difficile infection

    Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol.

    (2012)
  • W.R. Brown

    Fecal microbiota transplantation in treating Clostridium difficile infection

    J. Dig. Dis.

    (2014)
  • J.A. Hawrelak et al.

    The causes of intestinal dysbiosis: a review

    Altern. Med. Rev.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Probiotics for Prevention and Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection

      2024, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
    • Applications of xylitol in food, material, health, and medical sector

      2022, Current Advances in Biotechnological Production of Xylitol: Fermentative Production of Xylitol
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text