Coronary artery disease
Usefulness of Type D Personality in Predicting Five-Year Cardiac Events Above and Beyond Concurrent Symptoms of Stress in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.10.035Get rights and content

Psychological stress and type D personality have been associated with adverse cardiac prognosis, but little is known about their relative effect on the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease (CHD). “Type D” refers to the tendency to experience negative emotions and to inhibit the expression of these emotions in social interactions. We investigated the relative effect of stress and type D personality on prognosis at 5-year follow-up. At baseline, 337 patients with CHD who participated in cardiac rehabilitation filled in the General Health Questionnaire (psychological stress) and the Type D personality scale. Patients were followed for 5 years. The end point was major adverse cardiac events, which were defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and cardiac revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting/percutaneous coronary intervention). There were 46 major adverse cardiac events at follow-up, including 4 deaths and 8 myocardial infarctions. Type D patients had an increased risk of death/infarction (odds ratio 4.84, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 16.52, p = 0.01) compared with non–type D patients, independent of disease severity. Stress (p = 0.011) and type D (p = 0.001) were related to an increased risk of developing a major adverse cardiac event after adjusting for gender, age, and biomedical risk factors. Multivariate analysis yielded left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, no treatment with coronary artery bypass grafting, and type D personality (odds ratio 2.90, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 5.92, p = 0.003) as independent predictors of major adverse cardiac events, whereas psychological stress was marginally significant (odds ratio 2.01, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 4.11, p = 0.054). In conclusion, type D personality is a psychological factor that may optimize risk stratification in patients with CHD. Type D reflects more than temporary changes in general stress level because it predicted cardiac events after controlling for concurrent symptoms of stress.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (181)

  • The predictive value of positive affect and Type D personality for adverse cardiovascular clinical outcomes in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease

    2018, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    There are arguments in favor of both approaches, as is the case in Type D personality research [23] In future studies, it will also be of interest to further distinguish between multiplicative statistical versus biological interaction [45]. The findings of the current study concerning Type D personality are in part consistent with previous studies on Type D personality and medical outcomes of cardiac disease [16,46]. In the present study Type D personality, both continuously and dichotomously analyzed, did not predict outcomes.

  • Psychometric properties of the Catalan version of DS14 scale for assessing Type-D personality

    2018, Anuario de Psicologia
    Citation Excerpt :

    This version was developed and validated in the Dutch and Belgian general population and cardiac and primary health care patients, and showed improvements over its predecessor, such as its brevity and its greater facility to offer scores. Research on DS14 has shown that it is a suitable instrument for use in clinical and epidemiological research (Denollet, Pedersen, Vrints, & Conraads, 2006). DS14 is a rapid and effective screening instrument to optimize risk stratification in patients with cardiovascular disease (Albus, Jordan, & Herrmann-Lingen, 2004).

View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was supported by VICI Grant 016.055.621 from the Dutch Research Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.

View full text