Elsevier

Acta Materialia

Volume 60, Issues 6–7, April 2012, Pages 2625-2636
Acta Materialia

Achieving maximum hardness in semi-coherent multilayer thin films with unequal layer thickness

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.029Get rights and content

Abstract

Sources of plastic strengthening in [0 0 1] epitaxial Cu/Ni multilayer thin films are examined using measurements of in-plane lattice parameter and hardness (H) for films of different bilayer period (Λ) and Ni volume fraction (% Ni). Similar to other investigations, H for 50% Ni–50% Cu films increases with decreasing bilayer period down to Λ = 20 nm, where interfaces are coherent. A new finding is that H for semi-coherent films increases with % Ni. This strategy yields the largest reported H for this system (5.2 GPa for 60% Ni/40% Cu, Λ = 60 nm), showing that smaller is not always stronger. The rationale for the increased H is the development of a large interfacial dislocation density during the elasto-plastic transition to fully plastic yield. This strengthens Cu/Ni interfaces to slip propagation. The results are interpreted with a dislocation-based model that furnishes estimates of interfacial dislocation line energies, pinning strengths to confined layer slip, and interface barrier strengths to slip transmission.

Introduction

Numerous experiments document an increase in hardness (H) of metallic multilayer thin films with decreasing individual layer thickness (h). In the regime h < 50 nm, H  hn, where n is typically less than 0.5, signifying a deviation from the classic Hall–Petch relationship [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. This departure has been attributed to the discrete (small) number of pile-up dislocations against interfaces, culminating with confined layer slip (CLS) of single dislocation loops with decreasing h [2], [6], [7], [8], [9]. In this regime, dislocation-based CLS models require empirical fitting parameters to match hardness data [2], [10], [11]. Ultimately, the CLS model breaks down when h is so small that interfaces cannot confine single loops.

Computational approaches suggest that multilayer film hardness is intimately coupled to the nature of interfaces. During CLS, a fundamental quantity is the line energy of dislocations deposited along interfaces [7], [8], [12]. Peierls analyses suggest that such energies are small if interfaces are readily able to absorb and delocalize incoming dislocations [13]. For coherent iso-structural Cu/Ni films, atomistic studies show that interfaces are relatively weak barriers to transmission due to contiguous slip systems; instead, the primary source of dislocation confinement is coherency stress, which alternates in sign from one layer to another [11], [14], [15]. At the continuum scale, dislocation dynamics analyses suggest that local dislocation–dislocation interactions increase the critical resolved shear stress for CLS and thus provide a mechanism for hardening [16], [17], [18]. However, such models employ a fixed core cutoff and thus do not account for core spreading or other nonlinear phenomena observed in atomistic and Peierls simulations.

A principal aim of this work is to examine sources of plastic strengthening in epitaxial A/B multilayer thin films as a function of bilayer period and volume fractions of the A/B constituents. The approach is to couple experimental measurements of H and in-plane lattice parameters in Cu/Ni films with recent dislocation-based modeling [19]. The model partitions strategies for strengthening into two modes: increasing resistance to confined layer slip and increasing resistance to slip transmission across interfaces. These two orthogonal modes of loop expansion are intimately coupled to interfacial quantities, such as the line energy (w) to deposit dislocations at interfaces, pinning resistance (τpin) to confined layer slip and resistance (τi) to slip propagation across interfaces. Specific goals are to determine the variation in these quantities with interfacial dislocation density and to contrast how coherent vs. semi-coherent multilayer thin films derive their plastic strength.

This work provides specific advances to the experimental and modeling literature. First, hardness data is often presented with little quantitative description of the underlying microstructure [2], [4], [5], [20] and only for equal layer thickness (50% Ni–50% Cu) [4], [5], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. Here, hardness measurements are complemented by X-ray and transmission electron microscopy characterization to confirm texture, grain morphology and in-plane lattice strains prior to indentation. Films with unequal layer thickness (e.g. 60% Ni–40% Cu) are considered, and the results validate a hypothesis that H increases with % Ni at larger Λ (60 nm) [9]. This provides an alternate strengthening approach to the usual method of decreasing Λ at fixed % Ni and it yields a Cu/Ni film with maximum hardness (H = 5.2 GPa, adhered to [0 0 1] Si). The results confirm assumptions that in-plane stress decreases monotonically with increasing Λ [7], [9], [20], [25] and suggest appropriate values of dislocation prelogarithmic factors to adopt in dislocation dynamics simulations [12], [26], [27].

Section snippets

Synthesis

Cu/Ni multilayer thin films with uniform bilayer thickness Λ ranging from 22 to 60 nm and % Ni ranging from 25 to 60% were fabricated using DC magnetron sputtering at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Single crystal Si substrates with a (1 0 0) orientation were cleaned in a 50% HF solution for 5 min. A 100 nm thick Cu seed layer was deposited. X-ray diffraction revealed an in-plane lattice parameter (3.621 Å) close to that of unstrained Cu (3.615 Å) in the

Stress state and interfacial dislocation density prior to indentation

This section shows that the in-plane stress state and interfacial dislocation density can be inferred from measurements of in-plane lattice parameter. In particular, the average stress state in each phase (α = Cu, Ni) prior to indentation is modeled as an equibiaxial state, with in-plane elastic strain and stress given byeip(α)=ln(aip/a0)(α);σip(α)=eip(α)/(S11+S12)(α)Here, aip and a0 are the measured and stress-free lattice parameters along an in-plane 100 direction and [Sij] is the elastic

Electron microscopy, diffraction and hardness data

In-plane XRD (IPXRD) (Fig. 1b and c) and SAD patterns collectively indicate four key features: (i) layers had a single crystal-like texture (note the four distinct peaks spaced 90° apart in Fig. 1b), (ii) [0 0 1]Cu||[0 0 1]Ni and (1 0 0)Cu||(1 0 0)Ni (Fig. 1c), (iii) [0 0 1]Cu/Ni||[0 1 1]Si and (1 0 0)Cu/Ni||(1 0 0)Si, and (iv) the range of samples included coherent and semi-coherent interfaces. Table 1 shows values of in-plane strain eip(α), calculated from Eq. (1) using the average of the four IP peaks (Fig.

Prior dislocation density and stress state vs. bilayer period and % Ni

Fig. 5a and b shows that ρprior and σip,prior can be manipulated through Λ and % Ni. Comparison of samples A, D and F shows that increasing Λ from 20 to 60 nm monotonically increases ρprior. A similar increase in ρprior can be achieved by increasing % Ni from 25 to 60 (samples E vs. F). In this study, a maximum value, ρprior  0.011/b, was obtained at Λ = 60 nm and 60% Ni. This is about 50% of the fully incoherent limit (0.022), where Cu and Ni layers are at their respective stress-free lattice

Conclusions

For iso-structural multilayer films, the traditional strategy to maximize strength has been to utilize layers of equal thickness and reduce the bilayer period to a few nanometers where the layers are coherent, so that the yield strength is on the order of the coherency stress. In this work, an alternate approach utilizes semi-coherent multilayers with bilayer periods of a few tens of nanometers and unequal thickness layers. This strategy achieves maximum strength – even higher than coherent

Acknowledgements

This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, a US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences user facility. Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action equal opportunity employer, is operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the US Department of Energy under contract DE-AC52-06NA25396. J.S.C. and P.M.A. gratefully acknowledge J. Kevin Baldwin and the Center for Integrated

References (44)

  • A. Misra et al.

    Philos Mag

    (2002)
  • A. Misra et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2005)
  • A. Misra et al.

    JOM

    (2008)
  • A. Misra et al.

    Scr Mater

    (1998)
  • J. McKeown et al.

    Scr Mater

    (2002)
  • W.D. Nix

    Scr Mater

    (1998)
  • W.D. Nix

    Metall. Trans. A

    (1989)
  • P.M. Anderson et al.

    MRS Bull

    (1999)
  • J.D. Embury et al.

    Acta Metal

    (1994)
  • A.V. Lamm et al.

    Scr Mater

    (2004)
  • R.G. Hoagland et al.

    Scr Mater

    (2004)
  • E.R. Kriedler et al.

    Mater Res Soc Symp Proc

    (1996)
  • Y. Shen et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2006)
  • S.I. Rao et al.

    Philos Mag

    (2000)
  • R.G. Hoagland et al.

    Philos Mag

    (2002)
  • P. Pant et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2003)
  • F. Akasheh et al.

    J Appl Phys

    (2007)
  • F. Akasheh et al.

    J Appl Phys

    (2007)
  • P.M. Anderson et al.

    Scr Mater

    (2010)
  • A. Misra et al.

    Adv Eng Mater

    (2001)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2011)
  • N.R. Overman et al.

    J Eng Mater Tech

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text