Elsevier

Academic Radiology

Volume 24, Issue 4, April 2017, Pages 426-434
Academic Radiology

Original Investigation
Association Between Imaging Characteristics and Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.012Get rights and content

Rationale and Objective

Breast cancer can be divided into four major molecular subtypes based on the expression of hormone receptor (estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HER2 status, and molecular proliferation rate (Ki67). In this study, we sought to investigate the association between breast cancer subtype and radiological findings in the Chinese population.

Materials and Methods

Medical records of 300 consecutive invasive breast cancer patients were reviewed from the database: the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. The imaging characteristics of the lesions were evaluated. The molecular subtypes of breast cancer were classified into four types: luminal A, luminal B, HER2 overexpressed (HER2), and basal-like breast cancer (BLBC). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between the subtype (dependent variable) and mammography or 15 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicators (independent variables).

Results

Luminal A and B subtypes were commonly associated with “clustered calcification distribution,” “nipple invasion,” or “skin invasion” (P < 0.05). The BLBC subtype was more commonly associated with “rim enhancement” and persistent inflow type enhancement in delayed phase (P < 0.05). HER2 overexpressed cancers showed association with persistent enhancement in the delayed phase on MRI and “clustered calcification distribution” on mammography (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Certain radiological features are strongly associated with the molecular subtype and hormone receptor status of breast tumor, which are potentially useful tools in the diagnosis and subtyping of breast cancer.

Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers and one of the leading causes of death among women worldwide (1). It is a heterogeneous disease with several distinct molecular subtypes based on receptor status, including expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–neu (HER2). Immunochemistry staining of the proliferation marker Ki67 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) also aid in the molecular subtyping of breast cancer. There are four major molecular subtypes: luminal A (ER+ or PR+ and HER2−), luminal B (ER+ or PR+ and HER2+), HER2 (ER− and PR− and HER2+), and basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) (ER−, PR−, and HER2−), which has a significant overlap with triple-negative breast cancer 2, 3, 4. Determination of molecular subtype may aid in treatment planning and monitoring the efficacy of therapy (5).

The different tumor biology of the molecular subtypes of breast cancer exhibits different morphologic patterns and microscopic pathology appearances (6). Different pathologic subtypes may cause different imaging features 7, 8, 9, 10. We sought to investigate the association between imaging characteristics (ultrasound mammography and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and the pathologic subtype of tumors.

A recent pilot study investigated the relationship of MR image phenotypes and the underlying global gene expression patterns (11), and presented a new approach to understand the underlying molecular biology of breast cancer. Additionally, MRI findings such as tumor size, morphology, shape, and enhancement characteristics have been shown to be useful in differentiating breast cancer subtypes 8, 12, 13. However, the diagnoses are usually established with indicators that are dependent on the operators and not comprehensive orquantitative. Very few studies have been carried out in the Chinese population. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of breast cancer subtypes and radiological findings in Chinese patients.

Section snippets

Patients

A retrospective review of medical records of 300 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer in Shenzhen People's Hospital, from 2003 to 2013, was performed. All patients had undergone MRI, and histopathological examination of biopsy or surgical specimens was done within a month of MRI examination. The mean age (±standard deviation) of the patients was 46 ± 10 years (age range, 21–77 years). The baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and mammography and MRI data were compiled.

Baseline Characteristics

The baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 3. The subtype distributions in the study population (N = 300) are as follows: luminal A, N = 144 (48%); luminal B, N = 85 (28.3%); HER2, N = 56 (18.7%); and BLBC, N = 15 (5%).

Association of Subtype with Baseline Characteristics

Patients without skin abnormality were more likely to have BLBC subtype than luminal A or luminal B subtype (P < 0.05); patients without a palpable mass were more likely to have BLBC subtype than Luminal B or HER2 subtype (P < 0.05). Patients without a positive family

Discussion

In this study, we find that radiological features including “rim enhancement,” “delayed phase—describes the enhancement pattern after 2 minutes or after the curve starts to change: persistent,” and “clustered calcification distribution” showed an association with breast cancer subtype (P < 0.05). The BLBC subtype showed a stronger association with “rim enhancement” (14) and “delayed phase —persistent”; luminal A and luminal B subtypes showed a stronger association with “clustered calcification

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Project of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China (JCYJ20150403101146281).

References (22)

  • K.E. Huber et al.

    Breast cancer molecular subtypes in patients with locally advanced disease: impact on prognosis, patterns of recurrence, and response to therapy

    Semin Radiat Oncol

    (2009)
  • K. Armstrong et al.

    Breast cancer risk prediction and mammography biopsy decisions: a model-based study

    Am J Prev Med

    (2013)
  • R.L. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2015)
  • A. Toss et al.

    Molecular characterization and targeted therapeutic approaches in breast cancer

    Breast Cancer Res

    (2015)
  • Cancer Genome Atlas Network

    Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Nature

    (2012)
  • C.M. Perou et al.

    Molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Nature

    (2000)
  • N. Bhooshan et al.

    Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers

    Radiology

    (2010)
  • S.C. Agner et al.

    Computerized image analysis for identifying triple-negative breast cancers and differentiating them from other molecular subtypes of breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: a feasibility study

    Radiology

    (2014)
  • M.S. Bae et al.

    Quantitative MRI morphology of invasive breast cancer: correlation with immunohistochemical biomarkers and subtypes

    Acta Radiol

    (2015)
  • A.G. Bitencourt et al.

    Role of MRI in the staging of breast cancer patients: does histological type and molecular subtype matter?

    Br J Radiol

    (2015)
  • S. Chiacchio et al.

    Association between semiquantitative Pet parameters and molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma

    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

    (2015)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Prediction of molecular subtypes of breast cancer using BI-RADS features based on a “white box” machine learning approach in a multi-modal imaging setting

      2019, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      We found that the ages of onset of HER2 and BLBC subtypes were younger than the age of onset for the luminal subtypes (p < 0.001), which was not surprising because HER2 and BLBC were more malignant and progress more quickly [7]. Breastfeeding history differentiated between Luminal A and Luminal B on the decision tree (p < 0.001), a finding that was consistent with our previous study [25]. We found that calcifications were more frequent in the HER-2 subtype, which was concordant with a previous study [26].

    • Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype Prediction by Mammographic Radiomic Features

      2019, Academic Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently, breast cancer subtype characterization has made progress on using radiological images. For example, certain qualitative and visual information of the imaging characteristics assessed on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mammography, or ultrasound has been shown to be related to the molecular subtypes of breast cancer (5–8). Radiomics refers to the extraction and analysis of a large amount of quantitative imaging features from medical images, which has been extensively studied in recent literature, demonstrating predictive or prognostic associations between quantitative imaging features and medical outcome (9,10).

    • Transcripts of cytokeratins as predictors of breast cancer

      2018, Gene Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, several factors are intertwined during malignant transformation and tumor development (DeSantis et al., 2016; Apuri, 2017). For this reason, the search for molecular changes that may affect the biology of cancer development and progression may be important for understanding this disease and improving clinical management of BC patients (Wu and Ma, 2017). Distinct keratins emerge as highly dynamic scaffolds involved in different settings and contribute to cell size determination, translation control, proliferation, cell type-specific organelle transport and malignant transformation (Liu et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text