Elsevier

Analytical Biochemistry

Volume 358, Issue 2, 15 November 2006, Pages 247-256
Analytical Biochemistry

Assay for the quantification of intact/fragmented genomic DNA

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2006.07.035Get rights and content

Abstract

This study shows that the accuracy of the quantification of genomic DNA by the commonly used Hoechst- and PicoGreen-based assays is drastically affected by its degree of fragmentation. Specifically, it was shown that these assays underestimate by 70% the concentration of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) with sizes less than 23 kb. On the other hand, DNA sizes greater and less than approximately 23 kb are commonly characterized as intact and fragmented genomic DNA, respectively, by the agarose electrophoresis DNA smearing assay and are evaluated only qualitatively by this assay. The need for accurate quantification of fragmented and total genomic DNA, combined with the lack of specific, reliable, and simple quantitative methods, prompted us to develop a Hoechst/PicoGreen-based fluorescent assay that quantifies both types of DNA. This assay addresses these problems, and in its Hoechst and PicoGreen version it accurately quantifies dsDNA as being either intact (⩾23 kb) or fragmented (<23 kb) in concentrations as low as 3 ng ml−1 or 5 pg ml−1 with Hoechst or PicoGreen, respectively, as well as the individual fractions of intact/fragmented DNA existing in any proportions in a total DNA sample in concentrations as low as 10  ng ml−1 or 15 pg ml−1 with Hoechst or PicoGreen, respectively. Because the assay discriminates total genomic DNA in the two size ranges (⩾23 and <23 kb) and quantitates them, it is proposed as the quantitative replacement of the agarose gel electrophoresis genomic DNA smearing assay.

Section snippets

Reagents

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), Tris–HCl base, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and MnCl2 were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Quant-iT PicoGreen was obtained from Invitrogen–Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA). Hoechst 33258 (bis-benzimide), DNA type I (from calf thymus), highly purified unsheared genomic DNA (from calf thymus), DNase I (from bovine pancreas), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and ethidium bromide were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). DNA size markers

Results and discussion

Preliminary observations in our laboratory showed that the accurate quantification of dsDNA by the most commonly used Invitrogen–Molecular Probes protocols with the fluorescent dyes Hoechst and PicoGreen [20] depends strongly on its degree of fragmentation, whereas its UV absorbance (at 260 nm) is not affected. These observations are in contrast to the unconsidered effect of dsDNA size on the fluorescence of DNA–dye complexes in the protocols and in the relevant literature [15], [16], [17], [18]

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the European Social Fund (ESF), Operational Program for Educational and Vocational Training II (EPEAEK II), and particularly the Program IRAKLEITOS. We thank George Kilias and Stephanos Martimianakis (Department of Biology, University of Patras) for their valuable assistance in the gel electrophoresis experiments.

References (22)

  • K.R. Chohan et al.

    Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm

    J. Androl.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Development and biological evaluation of protective effect of kidney targeted N-acetylated chitosan nanoparticles containing thymoquinone for the treatment of DNA damage in cyclophosphamide-induced haemorrhagic cystitis

      2022, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
      Citation Excerpt :

      The inhibition of CYP-induced DNA damage was evident from the results of the DNA fragmentation assay and the comet assay which further support the potent anti-oxidant and DNA protective activities of TQ-NP. The DNA fragmentation assay is a qualitative assay indicating DNA protective effects against induced oxidative damage of DNA [39]. In support of this assay, comet assay was also carried out as a semi-quantitative method to determine the extent of DNA damage [40].

    • Soil microbial DNA concentration is a powerful indicator for estimating soil microbial biomass C and N across arid and semi-arid regions in northern China

      2021, Applied Soil Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Secondly, the DNA extraction efficiency may differ among different environments (Torsvik et al., 1996). For example, DNA quantification was seriously affected by the presence of humic acid (Bachoon et al., 2001), the soil structure (de Lipthay et al., 2004) and the degree of fragmentation of double-stranded DNA (Georgiou and Papapostolou, 2006). Thirdly, the previous studies are seriously restricted by the lack of numerous experimental data from different ecosystems on a large scale.

    • Glycosaminoglycan functionalization of electrospun scaffolds enhances Schwann cell activity

      2019, Acta Biomaterialia
      Citation Excerpt :

      DNA quantification was performed using a standard curve ranging from 0.5 μg/mL to 2 μg/mL of λDNA, provided by the manufacturer. The number of cells was calculated assuming that approximately 6.6 pg of DNA is present in each mammalian cell as also described in literature [61]. To quantify GAGs produced by cells seeded on scaffolds during culture, spectrophotometric assays based on 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) solution (38 mM DMMB, 9.5 mM HCl, 40.5 mM glycine, 40.5 mM NaCl in water, pH 3) were performed.

    • Novel approach for accurate minute DNA quantification on microvolumetric solutions

      2018, Microchemical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Used in conjunction with the PicoGreen® assay, these equipment provide a highly sensitive means of dsDNA quantification with minimal consumption of sample [17] which is of high importance for such applications due to the reduced volumes used. However, this approach has some limitations, particularly regarding the quantification accuracy, being affected by the degree of fragmentation of DNA, which might result in estimation of the concentration of totally fragmented DNA as low as 30% from the estimated of its intact form [18], DNA structure or conformation, and by some buffers commonly used in DNA extraction protocols [12]. The optimization and the evaluation of novel μSPE-based DNA purification devices and protocols generally involve the comparison of the DNA extraction profile among the different alternatives under study [3,19–21].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text