Chapter 48 - The Neurobiology of Dreaming

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-6645-3.00048-7Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (0)

Cited by (41)

  • Sleep disorders and genes

    2019, The Behavioral, Molecular, Pharmacological, and Clinical Basis of the Sleep-Wake Cycle
  • Arousal and normal conscious cognition

    2019, Arousal in Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases
  • Neurochemistry and pharmacology of sleep

    2019, The Behavioral, Molecular, Pharmacological, and Clinical Basis of the Sleep-Wake Cycle
  • Beyond the neuropsychology of dreaming: Insights into the neural basis of dreaming with new techniques of sleep recording and analysis

    2017, Sleep Medicine Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    This dissociation is suggestive of a high-order visual processing during sleep, without external visual input and with a decreased activity of V1. The majority of subsequent neuroimaging studies (for reviews [109,110]) have shown substantial differences in brain activity during REM compared with NREM sleep, in which activation diminishes from waking levels [107,111]. In particular, REM sleep is characterized by an increased activity in the pons and midbrain, thalamus, basal ganglia, hypothalamus, ventral striatum and visual association cortices, and midline limbic and paralimbic areas, as well as in orbitofrontal and paracingulate cortices and in part of the mPFC [105,107], whereas the dlPFC remains deactivated after the transition from NREM to REM sleep [105,107,108,112].

  • Daydreams and nap dreams: Content comparisons

    2015, Consciousness and Cognition
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the mind-wandering theory is not yet comprehensive enough to adequately explain the ensemble of our findings including: (1) why NREM nap dreams showed lower levels of sensory experience and emotion than did daydreams; (2) why REM nap dreams exceeded NREM nap dreams so markedly on all attributes; (3) why REM nap dreams and daydreams failed to differ on the positive and negative emotion measures when some research suggests that dreams contain more negative emotions than waking event reports (Nielsen, Deslauriers, & Baylor, 1991) while mind-wandering contains more positive emotions (Fox et al., 2013; Schredl, 2010). Also, the fact that the default mode network is only partially activated during REM sleep (Pace-Schott, 2010) places these mind-wandering theories on a questionable neurophysiological footing. In sum, while the mind-wandering hypothesis is a novel and promising attempt to unify different forms of imagery generation, it lacks both the phenomenological and neurophysiological detail to explain all findings from the present contrasts between REM nap, NREM nap and daydream imagery.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text