Abstract
The Chinese fire belly newts (Cynops orientalis) have the ability to escape from the glass tank with vertical walls. An experimental device was developed to investigate the sticking and climbing behaviors of the newts. The detaching angles of the newt on the surfaces of glass, PMMA, and SUS 304 stainless steel at dry, little-water, and plenty-water conditions were measured and used as an index to evaluate the sticking and climbing abilities of the newts on tilted surface. The experimental results show that the newts have a strong ability to stick on tilted surface, particularly on the surface with little water. Morphological studies of the toe pads and belly were carried out by SEM and cryo-SEM to clarify the sticking mechanisms. It is found that the toe pad of the newt consists of a dense array of nanopillars with ca 100 nm - 300 nm diameter surrounded by small channels. This structure is supposed to facilitate high adhesion to substrate by providing capillary forces, and promote the squeeze-out of fluid between the toe pad and substrate in flooded case.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Evans C J, Bryan J B. “Structured”, “textured” or “engineered” surfaces. Annals of the CIRP, 1999, 48, 541–556.
Ren L, Han Z, Li J, Tong J. Effects of non-smooth characteristics on bionic bulldozer blades in resistance reduction against soil. Journal of Terramechanics, 2002, 39, 221–230.
Ren L. Progress in the bionic study on anti-adhesion and resistance reduction of terrain machines. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52, 273–284.
Huang W, Jiang L, Zhou C, Wang X. The lubricant retaining effect of micro-dimples on the sliding surface of PDMS. Tribology International, 2012, 52, 87–93.
Yu H, Huang W, Wang X. Dimple patterns design for different circumstances. Lubrication Science, 2013, 25, 67–78.
Niu S, Li B, Mu Z, Yang M, Zhang J, Han Z, Ren L. Excellent structure-based multifunction of morpho butterfly wings: A review. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 170–189.
Bechert D W, Bruse M, Hage W, Meyer R. Fluid mechanics of biological surfaces and their technological application. Naturwissenschaften, 2000, 87, 157–171.
Bhushan B. Biomimetics: Lessons from nature-an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2009, 367, 1445–1486.
Cohen D, Kligerman Y, Etsion I. The Effect of surface roughness on static friction and junction growth of an elastic- plastic spherical contact. Journal of Tribology, 2009, 131, 021404.
He Q, Yu M, Li Y, Chen X, Zhang H, Gong L, Dai Z. Adhesion Characteristics of a novel synthetic polydimethylsiloxane for bionic adhesive pads. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2014, 11, 371–377.
Voigt D, Konrad W, Gorb S. A universal glue: Underwater adhesion of the secretion of the carnivorous flypaper plant Roridula gorgonias. Interface Focus, 2015, 5, 20140053.
Federle W, Brainerd E L, McMahon T A, Holldobler B. Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001, 98, 6215–6220.
Gorb S N. Biological and biologically inspired attachment systems, in Bhushan B (ed), Handbook of Nano-technology, Springer, Germany, 2010, 1525–1545.
Langer M G, Ruppersberg J P, Gorb S. Adhesion forces measured at the level of a terminal plate of the fly’s seta. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2004, 271, 2209–2215.
Eisner T, Aneshansley D J. Defense by foot adhesion in a beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000, 97, 6568–6573.
Bullock J M, Drechsler P, Federle W. Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: Friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2008, 211, 3333–3343.
Dirks J H. Physical principles of fluid-mediated insect attachment- Shouldn’t insects slip? Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 2014, 5, 1160–1166.
Niederegger S, Gorb S, Jiao Y. Contact behaviour of tenent setae in attachment pads of the blowfly Calliphora vicina (Diptera, Calliphoridae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 2002, 187, 961–970.
Kesel A B. Adhesion measurements on the attachment devices of the jumping spider Evarcha arcuata. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2003, 206, 2733–2738.
Kesel A B, Martin A, Seidl T. Getting a grip on spider attachment: An AFM approach to microstructure adhesion in arthropods. Smart Materials and Structures, 2004, 13, 512.
Niederegger S, Gorb S. Friction and adhesion in the tarsal and metatarsal scopulae of spiders. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2006, 192, 1223–1232.
Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, Zesch W, Chan W P, Kenny T W, Fearing R, Full R J. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature, 2000, 405, 681–685.
Filippov A E, Gorb S N. Spatial model of the gecko foot hair: Functional significance of highly specialized non-uniform geometry. Interface Focus, 2015, 5, 20140065.
Welsch U, Storch V, Fuchs W. The fine structure of the digital pads of rhacophorid tree frogs. Cell and tissue research, 1974, 148, 407–416.
Green D M. Treefrog toe pads: Comparative surface morphology using scanning electron microscopy. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1979, 57, 2033–2046.
Ernst V V. The digital pads of the tree frog, Hyla cinerea. II. the mucous glands. Tissue and Cell, 1973, 5, 97–104.
Green D M, Simon M P. Digital microstructure in ecologically diverse sympatric microhylid frogs, genera cophixalus and sphenophryne (amphibia, Anura), from Papua-new-Guinea. Australian journal of zoology, 1986, 34, 135–145.
Ernst V V. The digital pads of the tree frog, Hyla cinerea. I. the epidermis. Tissue and Cell, 1973, 5, 83–96.
Peters J A. Dictionary of Herpetology, Hafner Publ. Co., New York, 1964
Porter K R. Herpetology, Saunders W B. Co., Philadelphia, 1972.
Dewitz H. Ueber die Fortbewegung der Thiere an senkrechten, glatten Flächen vermittelst eines Secretes. Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, 1884, 33, 440–481. (in German)
Persson B N J. Wet adhesion with application to tree frog adhesive toe pads and tires. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2007, 19, 376110.
Federle W, Barnes W J, Baumgartner W, Drechsler P, Smith J M. Wet but not slippery: Boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2006, 3, 689–697.
Barnes W J P. Functional morphology and design constraints of smooth adhesive pads. MRS bulletin, 2007, 32, 479–485.
Drotlef D M, Appel E, Peisker H, Dening K, del Campo A, Gorb S N, Barnes W J P. Morphological studies of the toe pads of the rock frog, Staurois parvus (family: Ranidae) and their relevance to the development of new biomimetically inspired reversible adhesives. Interface Focus, 2014, 5, 20140036.
Gorb S N, Jiao Y, Scherge M. Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2000, 186, 821–831.
Rui Y, Lingna Z, Jingwei F, Jianli W, Kefeng F, Tongquan Y, Shaohui W, Yanli D. Insect specimens for scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture, 2014, 29, 33–35. (in Chinese)
Su-zhi G, Qing-e J. Drying methods of insect specimens for scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Fujian Agricultural University, 2001, 30, 262–265.
Huang W, Wang X. Biomimetic design of elastomer surface pattern for friction control under wet conditions. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2013, 8, 046001.
Li M, Huang W, Wang X. Bioinspired, peg-studded hexagonal patterns for wetting and friction. Biointerphases, 2015, 10, 031008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, S., Li, M., Huang, W. et al. Sticking/climbing ability and morphology studies of the toe pads of Chinese fire belly newt. J Bionic Eng 13, 115–123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60165-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60165-7