Skip to main content
Log in

Design of a biomimetic skin for an octopus-inspired robot — Part II: Development of the skin artefact

Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to develop skin artefact for an octopus-inspired robot arm, which is designed to be able to elongate 60% of its original length, silicone rubber and knitted nylon sheet were selected to manufacture an artificial skin, due to their higher elastic strain and high flexibility. Tensile and scissors cutting tests were conducted to characterise the matrix and reinforcing materials and the skin artefact. Material properties of the individual and the composite materials were compared with the measured properties of real octopus skin presented in Part I. The Young’s modulus of the skin should be below 20 MPa and the elastic strain range should be over 60%. The fracture toughness should be at least 0.9 kJ·m−2. Tubes made of the skin artefact filled with liquid were tested to study volume change under deformation. Finite element analysis model was developed to simulate the material and arm structure under tensile loading. Results show that the skin artefact developed has similar mechanical properties as the real octopus skin and satisfies all the design specifications of the OCTOPUS robot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hou J P, Bonser, R H C, Jeronimidis, G. Design of a Biomimetic Skin for an Octopus-Inspired Robot — Part I: Characterising Octopus Skin. Journal of Bionic Engineering, in press.

  2. Supp D M, Boyce S T. Engineered skin substitutes: practices and potentials. Clinics in Dermatology, 2005, 23, 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu X H, Smith L A, Hu J, Ma P X. Biomimetic nanofibrous gelatin/apatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2009, 30, 2252–2258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mertsching H, Walles T, Hofmann M, Schanz J, Knapp W H. Engineering of a vascularized scaffold for artificial tissue and organ generation. Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 6610–6617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kremer M, Lang E, Berger A C. Evaluation of dermal-epidermal skin equivalents (‘composite-skin’) of human keratinocytes in a collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix (Integra TM Artificial Skin). British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2000, 53, 459–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang H W, Tabata Y, Ikada Y. Fabrication of porous gelatine scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 1999, 20, 1339–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tampieri A, Sandri M, Landi E, Pressato D, Francioli S, Quarto R, Martin I. Design of graded biomimetic osteochondral composite scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2008, 29, 3539–3546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hutmacher D W, Ng K W, Kaps C, Sittinger M, Kläring S. Elastic cartilage engineering using novel scaffold architectures in combination with a biomimetic cell carrier. Biomaterials, 2003, 24, 4445–4458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacNeil S. Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin. Nature, 2007, 445, 874–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stern R, McPherson M, Longaker M T. Histologic study of artificial skin used in the treatment of full-thickness thermal injury. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, 1990, 11, 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wainwright D, Madden M, Luterman A, Hunt J, Monafo W, Heimbach D, Kagan R, Sittig K, Dimick A, Herndon D. Clinical evaluation of an acellular allograft dermal matrix in full-thickness burns. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, 1996, 17, 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marston WA, Hanft J, Norwood P, Pollak R. The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a prospective randomized trial. Diabetes Care, 2003, 26, 1701–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen G, Sato T, Ohgushi H, Ushida T, Tateishi T, Tanaka J. Culturing of skin fibroblasts in a thin PLGA-collagen hybrid mesh. Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 2559–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Powell H M, Boyce S T. Engineered human skin fabricated using electrospun collagen-PCL blends: Morphogenesis and mechanical properties. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2009, 15, 2177–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Young C D, Wu J R, Tsou T L. High-strength ultra-thin and fibre-reinforced pHEMA artificial skin. Biomaterials, 1998, 19, 1745–1752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. OCTOPUS D8.1. Biomechatronic Specifications of the Robotic Octopus, http://www.octopusproject.eu, 2009.

  17. Lucas P W, Pereira B. Estimation of fracture toughness of leaves. Functional Ecology, 1990, 4, 819–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Choong M F, Lucas P W, Ong J S Y, Pereira B, Tan T W, Turner I M. Leaf fracture toughness and sclerophylly-their correlations and ecological implications. New Phytologist, 1992, 121, 597–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonser R H C, Saker L, Jeronimidis G. Toughness anisotropy in feather keratin. Journal of Materials Science, 2004, 39, 2895–2896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Atkins A G, Xu X. Slicing of soft flexible solids. Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2005, 47, 479–492.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Vincent J F V. Fracture in Biomechanics Materials-A Practical Approach, IRL Press, Oxford, UK, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kier W M, Smith K K. Tongues, tentacle and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular-hydrostats. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1985, 83, 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinping Hou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hou, J., Bonser, R.H.C. & Jeronimidis, G. Design of a biomimetic skin for an octopus-inspired robot — Part II: Development of the skin artefact. J Bionic Eng 8, 297–304 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60033-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60033-4

Navigation