Maxillary distraction for the management of cleft maxillary hypoplasia with a rigid external distraction system*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(99)80042-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Maxillary hypoplasia is a common finding in patients with repaired orofacialclefts. Management of this condition has been a challenge to the reconstructive team. The introduction of distraction osteogenesis to treat craniofacial skeletal dysplasias has opened alternative approaches to manage these severe conditions. In this article, the authors present their technique to distract the hypoplastic cleft maxilla using a rigid external distraction device. The clinical assessment, indications, orthodontic procedure, surgical technique, and distraction protocol are reviewed. A case report shows the use of the technique. This technique allows the reconstructive team to treat patients in all age groups with predictable and stable results.

References (23)

  • MolinaF. et al.

    Maxillary distraction: Aesthetic and functional benefits in cleft lip palate and prognathic patients during mixed dentition

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1998)
  • Cited by (69)

    • Cleft Lip and Palate: LeFort I Distraction with Halo and Hybrid Internal Maxillary Distractors

      2021, Clinics in Plastic Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      This distraction system utilizes both bone and dental anchorage28 and provides stable maxillary advancement in patients with severe hypoplasia of the lower midface. In addition the technique is relatively simple, with low morbidity, predictable, and has shown stable long-term results.21,22,25,29 The benefits of distraction for correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia in patients with a cleft are well appreciated, but the benefits and limitations of internal versus external devices remain topics of active debate.

    • Midface correction in patients with Crouzon syndrome is Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device the gold standard?

      2019, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Until now a lot of studies have proven that craniofacial morphology affects the extent of the pharyngeal airway space (Alves et al., 2008; Park et al., 2010; Stellzig-Eisenhauer and Meyer-Marcotty, 2010). Numerous studies have demonstrated that a combined orthodontic–orthognathic treatment highly influences the upper airway space (Figueroa et al., 1999; Swennen et al., 2000; Fearon, 2001, 2005; Bannink et al., 2010). In our cohort, we have been able to reproduce these results both clinically and on three-dimensional analysis of posterior airway space.

    • Distraction osteogenesis and orthognathic surgery for a patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate

      2015, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cho and Kyung26 recommended overcorrection of 20% to 30% to minimize relapse. Because the maxilla was completely osteotomized, less force was needed during DO.2,27 This patient had secondary caries on all 4 maxillary molars.

    • Cleft-Orthognathic Surgery: The Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Deformity

      2013, Orthognathic Surgery: Principles and Practice
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    A.A.F. and J. WP. are unpaid consultants for the KLS MartinCompany. The clinical and educational goals of the Craniofacial Center are supported in part b y the KLS Martin Company,, Jacksonville, FL.

    View full text