Skip to main content
Log in

Entropy generation in bypass transitional boundary layer flows

  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) turbulence models to predict entropy generation rates in bypass transitional boundary layers flows under zero and adverse pressure gradients. Entropy generation rates in such flows are evaluated employing the commercial CFD software, ANSYS FLUENT. Various turbulence and transitional models are assessed by comparing their results with the direct numerical simulation (DNS) data and two recent CFD studies. A solution verification study is conducted on three systematically refined meshes. The factor of safety method is used to estimate the numerical error and grid uncertainties. Monotonic convergence is achieved for all simulations. The Reynolds number based on momentum thickness, Re θ , skin-friction coefficient, C f , approximate entropy generation rates, S‴, dissipation coefficient, C d , and the intermittency, γ, are calculated for bypass transition simulations. All Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (Rans) turbulence and transitional models show improvement over previous CFD results in predicting onset of transition. The transition Sst k- ω 4 equation model shows closest agreement with DNS data for all flow conditions in this study due to a much finer grid and more accurate inlet boundary conditions. The other Rans models predict an early onset of transition and higher boundary layer entropy generation rates than the DNS shows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WALSH E. J., MCELIGOT D. M. and BRANDT L. et al. Entropy generation in a boundary layer transitioning under the influence of freestream turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(6): 061203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ZAKI T. A., DURBIN P. A. Mode interaction and the bypass route to transition[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 531(1): 85–111.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. MCELIGOT D. M., WALSH E. J. and LAURIEN E. et al. Entropy generation in the viscous parts of turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(6): 061205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. SPALART P. R. Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to Re θ=1 410[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1988, 187(1): 61–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. SPALART P. R. Numerical study of sink-flow boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1986, 172(1): 307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ROTTA J. Turbulent boundary layers in incompressible flow[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1962, 2(1): 1–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. MCELIGOT D. M., WALSH E. J. and LAURIEN E. et al. Entropy generation in the viscous layer of a turbulent channel flow[R]. Idaho National Laboratory (INL), 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. ABE H., KAWAMURA H. and MATSUO Y. Direct numerical simulation of a fully developed turbulent cha-nnel flow with respect to the reynolds number dependence[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2001, 123(2): 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. KRAUSE E., OERTEL H. J. and SCHLICHTING H. Boundary-layer theory[M]. New York, USA: Springer, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. MCELIGOT D. M., NOLAN K. P. and WALSH E. J. Effects of pressure gradients on entropy generation in the viscous layers of turbulent wall flows[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2008, 51(5–6): 1104–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. TSUKAHARA T., SEKI Y. and KAWAMURA H. et al. DNS of turbulent channel flow at very low Reynolds numbers[C]. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena. Williamsburg, USA, 2005, 935–940.

    Google Scholar 

  12. WALSH E. J., MCELIGOT D. M. A New correlation for entropy generation in low Reynolds number turbulent shear layers[J]. International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research, 2009, 36(6): 566–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ABE H., KAWAMURA H. and MATSUO Y. Surface heat-flux fluctuations in a turbulent channel flow up to Re τ = 1020 with Pr = 0.025 and 0.71 [J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2004, 25(3): 404–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. HOYAS S., Jiménez J. Scaling of the velocity flu-ctuations in turbulent channels up to Re = 2003 [J]. Physics of fluids, 2006, 18(1): 011702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SCHLATTER P., BRANDT L. and De LANGE H. et al. On streak breakdown in bypass transition[J]. Physics of fluids, 2008, 20(1): 101505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. BRANDT L., SCHLATTER P. and HENNINGSON D. S. Transition in boundary layers subject to free-stream turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 517: 167–198.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. NOLAN K., ZAKI T. A. Conditional sampling of tran-sitional boundary layers in pressure gradients[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 728: 306–339.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. GHASEMI E., MCELIGOT D. and NOLAN K. et al. Entropy generation in a transitional boundary layer region under the influence of freestream turbulence using transitional Rans models and DNS[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 41(1): 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  19. GHASEMI E., MCELIGOT D. M. and NOLAN K P. et al. Effects of adverse and favorable pressure gradients on entropy generation in a transitional boundary layer region under the influence of freestream turbulence[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014, 77(1): 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ANSYS. “Fluent theory guide v14.0.0.”[R]. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. XING T., BHUSHAN S. and STERN F. Vortical and turbulent structures for KVLCC2 at drift angle 0, 12, and 30 degrees[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2012, 55(3): 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. XING T., STERN F. Closure to “Discussion of “Factors of safety for Richardson extrapolation”” (2011, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 133, 115501)[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(11): 115502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. XING T., STERN F. Factors of safety for richardson extrapolation[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2010, 132(6): 061403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WILSON R. V., STERN F. and COLEMAN H. W. et al. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of Cfd simulations-Part 2: Application for rans simulation of a cargo/container ship[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2001, 123(4): 803–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ANSYS. “Fluent user guide v14.0.0.”[R]. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. XING T., GEORGE J. Quantitative verification and validation of large eddy simulations[C]. Asme 2014 Verification and Validation Symposium. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  27. XING Tao. A general framework for verification and validation of large eddy simulations (keynote speaker)[C]. Proceedings of the 13th National Congress on Hydrodynamics and 26th Conference on Hydrodynamics. Qingdao, China, 2014, 40–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Xing.

Additional information

Biography: GEORGE Joseph (1986-), Male, Master Candidate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

George, J., Owen, L.D., Xing, T. et al. Entropy generation in bypass transitional boundary layer flows. J Hydrodyn 26, 669–680 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(14)60075-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(14)60075-5

Key words

Navigation