Original article
Ketorolac and spinal morphine for postcesarean analgesia

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80069-0Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open archive

Abstract

This study was designed to compare spinal morphine (SM), ketorolac (K), and a combination of the two drugs with respect to analgesic efficacy and side effects in postcesarean patients. Forty-eight parturients having bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery randomly received in a double-blind manner either: SM: 0.1 mg or SM: 0.2 mg (but no K); SM: 0.1 mg plus K 60 mg intravenously (i.v.) one hour after spinal injection, and 30 mg i.v. every 6 h for three doses or i.v. K dosed as previously described (but no SM). Analgesia and side effects were evaluated during the first 20 h. Forty-eight women were studied. There were no significant differences in analgesia among the groups, although patients receiving SM: 0.1 mg tended to have less satisfactory intraoperative analgesia. Pruritus was common in all patients receiving SM whereas patients who received K had the lowest overall scores for severity of side effects. No serious complications occurred and all groups expressed similarly high satisfaction at the 24 h visit. We conclude that there is no advantage to combining SM and K, and that K provides satisfactory postcesarean analgesia with few side effects.

Cited by (0)

1

S. E. Cohen, MB Ch B, FRCA, Professor of Anesthesia

2

J B. Desai, MD, Fellow in Obstetric Anesthesia

3

E. F. Ratner, MD, Assistant Professor of Anesthesia

4

E. T Riley, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesia

5

J Halpern, PhD, Senior Research Associate, Department of Health Research and Policy (Division of Biostatistics), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.