Tropical rainforest biome of Biosphere 2: Structure, composition and results of the first 2 years of operation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00092-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The tropical rainforest biome in the Biosphere 2 mesocosm was managed with rainfall and temperature conditions to simulate a natural rainforest typical of the new world tropics. The establishment of the biome was based on the introduction of excessive numbers of species allowing self-organization of an ecologically unique rainforest. Over 282 species of plants from rainforest areas were planted within the topographically diverse rainforest biome (area of 1900 m2, volume of 35 000 m3), just before the Biosphere 2 closure in 1991. Approximately 61% of these species survived when counted in 1993, representing a plant species richness reduction to 172 species in 0.19 hectare. Rank order graphs show that a high diversity community resulted not unlike insular rainforests. The plants of the rainforest mesocosm, however, grew under anomalous conditions of soil (amended desert grassland soil), atmospheric composition (CO2 up to 4500 ppm by volume (ppmv)) and rainwater composition (high salinity and nutrients). Stem growth rates of a dominant canopy tree, Cecropia, were up to four times higher but had reduced diameter at breast height compared to natural counterparts. Human intervention in plant succession was also an important factor in shaping the ecology of the rainforest biome of Biosphere 2.

Introduction

The tropical rainforest biome in Biosphere 2 was designed to be functionally analogous to planetary rainforests. One of five ecological systems of Biosphere 2 collectively called the ‘wilderness’ (Fig. 1a, b), it was built and its climate managed to emulate the general structure and function of a new world tropical rainforest. There were four design goals of the rainforest: (1) to produce a sustainable system that would help manage the atmosphere of Biosphere 2; (2) to contribute to the diversity of the Biosphere 2 laboratory; (3) to provide occasional food and other extras (cacao, flavors, medicines) to the inhabitants, and (4) to provide an attractive landscape for the inhabitants. The rainforest was excessively species-packed for self-organization over time under minimal influence of human management, with the expectation that new ecosystems would emerge representing ‘signatures’ of interactions among the physical properties of the system and the biota, including human residents. It was hypothesized that the rainforest structure would change over time from that of a recently cleared ecosystem to a complex primary forest (Prance, 1991, Finn, 1996, Silverstone and Nelson, 1996, Atkinson et al., 1999). Details of other areas in the wilderness and the agricultural area are given by Petersen et al. (1992), Finn (1996), Silverstone and Nelson (1996), Atkinson et al. (1999)and Marino et al. (1999).

The conceptual design for the rainforest biome began in 1985; plant collections were made from 1986–1991; planting began in 1989; and a total survey and mapping of every plant was completed prior to the first material closure, which lasted from September, 1991 through September, 1993. A total re-survey of plants in the rainforest was made after the 2 year closure and again in 1996. This paper describes the rainforest area, its habitats, the species planted, and the characteristics of the ecosystem that developed.

Section snippets

System description

A tropical rainforest climate was created by control of rain, temperature and humidity so as to support plant species from various humid tropical regions. The climate differed from a planetary tropical rainforest in that the annual changes in day length were much greater in Biosphere 2, and temperature and atmospheric CO2 ranges were greater on both a daily and annual basis (Fig. 2). Eight separate habitats were delineated in the rainforest biome. Although Amazonian plant species dominated,

Hydrologic cycle

The three terrestrial wilderness biomes of Biosphere 2—desert, tropical savanna, and tropical rainforest—vary substantially with regard to their ecological responses to hydrologic factors, and water management within each system varied accordingly. In contrast to the desert and savanna biomes, the rainforest plants were active continuously; dormancy was not part of the yearly cycle. In the tropical rainforest biome, water applied as rainfall flowed through and exited the soil profile throughout

Soils

An inspection of rainforest soils in December, 1993, showed differentiation with depth from the surface, and in particular, extensive soil homogenization of the upper 30–40 cm mostly due to earthworm activity. At the same time, soil pits revealed discontinuous soils next to plant sites where the original soils of the potted plants had not yet been mixed with surrounding soils (Scott, 1994). Average percent carbon and nitrogen ranged from about 3 to 2.3%, and from about 0.3 to 0.2%,

Discussion

The temperatures in the rainforest biomes were within daily and seasonal ranges appropriate for the marginal tropics but not for humid equatorial or montane forests. The usual daily range of the Biosphere 2 rainforest temperatures was about 6°C, and the lowest monthly average around 21°C. In equatorial rainforest areas, the mean temperature of the coldest month is never below 24°C; in the marginal tropics the coolest month may have an average as low as 18°C (Lauer, 1989). The relative humidity

Acknowledgements

The plant survey data used for this paper are the result of the efforts of Mission 1 Biospherians and the Mission Control Team; inventory and survey teams of Space Biospheres Ventures; the rainforest design team which included staff of the Royal Botanic Garden at Kew and the Institute of Economic Botany of the New York Botanical Garden. Jessica Bolson assisted with the 1996 plant survey. We acknowledge John Adams, Hewitt Stewart and Adrian Southern for assistance with figures and Jeff

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Ecotourism and the Treetops

    2004, Forest Canopies: Second Edition
  • The Biosphere 2 canopy access system

    1999, Ecological Engineering
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text