From TQM to BPR: Two case studies in personnel administration
References (5)
Will participative makeovers of business processes succeed where reengineering failed?
Planning Rev.
(1995)Reengineering work: don't automate obliterate
Harv. Bus. Rev.
(1990)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (20)
Integrating the global enterprise using Six Sigma: Business process reengineering at General Electric Wind Energy
2008, International Journal of Production EconomicsCitation Excerpt :The most commonly used definition comes from Hammer and Champy (1993), who define reengineering as the redesign of business processes to dramatically improve performance in terms of cost, quality, service, and speed. Researchers, including Hales and Savoie (1994), Irani et al. (1997), Farmer (1993), and De Bruyn and Gelders (1997), have extolled the virtues of BPR. The success of BPR has been widely publicized, while the more serious failures have not.
Achieving superior motivation and performance: The case of the acquisition and transformation of Cazel in Mexico
2013, Journal of Enterprise TransformationTotal quality management: Literature review and an agenda for future research
2012, International Journal of Productivity and Quality ManagementBusiness process governance: A comparative study of Germany and Japan
2012, Business Process Management JournalA practical approach to business transformation: The case of the telecommunication services of trinidad and tobago
2012, Journal of Enterprise TransformationUnderstanding dynamic is capabilities for effective process change: A theoretical framework and an empirical application
2011, International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011
Copyright © 1997 Published by Elsevier B.V.