Original article
Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in cognitive rehabilitation patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00014-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Measuring the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation programs poses both conceptual and practical challenges. We compared several standardized outcome measures with goal attainment scaling (GAS) to assess their sensitivity to changes in health status in patients undergoing cognitive rehabilitation. GAS is a measurement approach that accommodates multiple individual patient goals, and has a scoring system which allows for comparisons between patients. Forty-four patients were evaluated. GAS yielded a mean 4.4 goals per patient. The mean gain in the GAS score was compared with the change in the Rappaport Disability Rating Scale, the Kohlman Evaluation of Daily Living Skills, the Milwaukee Evaluation of Daily Living, the Klein-Bell elimination scale and mobility scale, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, and the Spitzer Quality of Life Index. Using a relative efficiency statistic, GAS proved more responsive than any other measure. The effect size statistic also demonstrated greater responsiveness to change with GAS compared with standard measures. GAS shows promise as a responsive measure in cognitive rehabilitation. This study replicates a similar study of GAS in frail elderly patients, suggesting that individualized measures may have broad merit in evaluating rehabilitation programs.

References (37)

  • BM Joyce et al.

    Use of goal attainment scaling in brain injury in a rehabilitation hospital

    Am J Phys Med Rehabil

    (1994)
  • M Rappaport et al.

    Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: Coma to community

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1982)
  • N Rao et al.

    Predicting return to work in traumatic brain injury using assessment scales

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1992)
  • WM High et al.

    Critical analysis of studies evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (1995)
  • KM Hall et al.

    Outcome evaluation in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Measurement tools for a nationwide data system

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1994)
  • RM Klein et al.

    Self-care skills. Behaviour measurement with patients with Klein-Bell ADL scale

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1982)
  • MP Lawton et al.

    Assessment of older people: Self- maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living

    Gerontologist

    (1969)
  • CA Leonardelli

    The Milwaukee Evaluation of Daily Living Skills: Evaluation in Long-term Psychiatric Care

    (1988)
  • Cited by (150)

    • Goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice: A feasibility study

      2021, International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
    • Evaluation of a parent preference-based outcome measure after intensive communication intervention for children with social (pragmatic) communication disorder and high-functioning autism spectrum disorder

      2020, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      Goal attainment scaling (GAS) as a measurement technique is well-established in inter-disciplinary practice (Calder, Ward, Jones, Johnston, & Claessen, 2018) and has been advocated as good practice in developmental disability research (McDougall & Wright, 2009). GAS techniques have been used to measure outcomes of communication impairments associated with traumatic brain injury (Finch et al., 2019), in populations with intellectual disabilities (Bailey & Simeonsson, 1988) and cognitive rehabilitation settings (Rockwood, Joyce, & Stolee, 1997). In autism research, GAS been mainly used in the context of education and behavioural goals, e.g., Ruble, Dalrymple, and McGrew (2010); Oren and Ogletree (2000); Charney et al. (2017), Coffee and Ray-Subramanian (2009).

    • Maximizing cognition in mild cognitive impairment and early stage dementia

      2020, Diagnosis and Management in Dementia: The Neuroscience of Dementia, Volume 1
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text