Influence of body fat content on digestible energy requirements of exercising horses in temperate and hot environments*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-0806(06)80118-8Get rights and content

Summary

Six mature horses were used to determine the energy requirements of exercising horses during different seasons and in different body conditions. Horses were conditioned to work 7.2 km in 30 min 5 d/wk and fed to either a fleshy or moderate body condition during both hot (temperature mean 32.4 C, with a 23.9–36.1 C range) and temperate (temperature mean 17.4 C, with a 3.9–27.8 C range) seasons. Horses were fed average quality Bermuda grass hay at .75% of body weight sufficient concentrate to maintain body weight and condition. During each combination of body condition and season when body weight, condition and feed intake were stable for 14 d horses were declared at energy equilibrium and a digestion trial was conducted. Horses in fleshy body condition (7.5) required 2.3 kg/d more total feed than horses in moderate (5.2) body condition. When expressed in terms of digestible energy (DE) intake, fleshy horses required 11.12 kcal/kgBW/d more than horses in moderate flesh. When DE for maintenance (DEM) was calculated as the difference between DE intake and DE for work (DEW), DEM for horses in fleshy condition exceeded that of horses in moderate condition by 11.3 kcal/kgBW/d (P<.01). Seasonal effects on feed and DE intake were not as apparent as the effect of body condition. These data indicate that body condition is a significant consideration when estimating DE requirements for the performance horse in all seasons and that optimum body condition for the performance horse may vary according to ambient temperature and humidity at the time of performance.

References (12)

  • HennekeDR et al.

    Body condition during pregnancy and lactation and reproductive efficiency of mares

    Therio

    (1984)
  • AikenMM et al.

    Correlations between physiological and biochemical parameters to assess fitness in the horse

    J S Afr Vet Assn

    (1970)
  • AndersonCE et al.

    Digestible energy requirements for exercising horses

    J Anim Sci

    (1983)
  • BrooksGA et al.

    Exercise Physiology: Human bioenergetics and its applications

  • ByersFM et al.

    Seasonal variation in maintenance requirements of beef cows of five breeds

  • HennekeDR et al.

    Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares

    Equine Vet J

    (1983)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (18)

  • Visual Assessment of Adiposity in Elite Hunter Ponies

    2023, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Excessive adiposity is associated with systemic inflammation and equine metabolic syndrome and is linked with increased chances of morbidity and mortality, primarily as a result of laminitis [16, 17]. Equine performance may also be impaired to some degree by adiposity, due to increased work load and heat stress [18], altered gait quality [19] and a potential risk for osteoarthritis development such as what occurs in overweight canines [20]. Despite these concerns, horse owners and trainers appear to be hesitant to implement weight loss efforts in their animals.

  • Estimation of Actual and Ideal Bodyweight Using Morphometric Measurements of Miniature, Saddle-Type, and Thoroughbred Horses

    2019, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    In one study, an overweight pony with a 6.5 body condition score (BCS) was rated as “about right” for showing [8]. This preference may be due to a lack of awareness that excessive BW contributes to insulin resistance [11], equine metabolic syndrome (EMS) [11], laminitis [11], poor thermoregulation [12], and decreased athletic ability [13]. Some breeds are known to be more predisposed to BW gain, including ponies and Morgans [14].

  • Voluntary Energy Intake and Expenditure in Obese and Lean Horses Consuming ad libitum Forage

    2019, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Fat-free mass is the primary determinant of resting EE in humans [24], so it was expected that the lean group would require more energy, on average, per kilogram of body mass. Although previous work in native ponies found higher maintenance energy requirements for nonobese individuals [14], other work in horses found that horses in fleshy body condition (BCS 7.5) required more DEI per kg of BW for maintenance than horses in moderate body condition (BCS 5.2) [25]. However, those studies were conducted in native ponies and exercising horses, respectively, whereas this study was conducted in idle horses.

  • Relationships Among Digestible Energy Intake, Body Weight, and Body Condition in Mature Idle Horses

    2017, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    This scenario likely reflects the situation of many rescue groups and private owners who purchase or rescue horses with unknown background or careers. Previous studies have shown that the amount of weight gain in a particular horse is dependent on additional factors, such as the maturity of the horse [15], body condition of the horse [26], basal metabolism [24,27], the composition of the diet [28], and energy expenditure [29,30]. Nevertheless, no significant difference with respect to potentially influential variables, that is, age or environmental temperature, was found that could be quantified.

  • Increase of fat-free mass and low percentage of body fat in Brazilian sport horses training under tropical climate

    2017, Livestock Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    But, another factors should be taken into account such as rideability, temperament, flexibility and impulse. According to Webb et al. (1990), ambient temperature and environmental conditions influence the weight and physical condition of horses. An increase in body weight is observed in horses in temperate climates, indicating that the animals require more energy during warmer seasons.

View all citing articles on Scopus
*

Technical Article 24993, Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta.

1

Authors' address: Equine Sciences Program, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

View full text