Progression analysis (PA): investigating writing strategies at the workplace
References (30)
The Language of News Media
(1991)- et al.
Journalisten in der Schweiz. Eigenschaften, Einstellungen, Einflüsse (Journalists in Switzerland. Characteristics, Attitudes, Influences)
(2001) Rewriting: the arts and sciences of improving expository instructional text
Methoden der Textproduktionsforschung (Methods in text production research)
The Constitution of Society
(1984)Writing and speaking. Common grounds and differences toward a regulation theory of written language production
- et al.
“Once upon a time”. The use of retrospective accounts in building theory in composition
Journalistisches Texten. Sprachliche Grundlagen für Professionelles Informieren (Journalistic Text Composition. Linguistic Foundations of Professional Information)
(2001)Der Text als Ort der öffentlichen Kommunikation. Zur sprachlichen Aus- und Fortbildung im Journalismus (The text as a place of public communication. Linguistic education and training in journalism)
A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing
Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes
Analyzing writers’ revising patterns with S-notation analysis
Concurrent and retrospective protocols in writing research
Trace-it 2.0 User's Manual
Cited by (72)
Students' and teachers' perceptions of effective ESP teaching
2022, HeliyonCitation Excerpt :Like General English teachers, ESP teachers or instructors should help learners learn, acquire, and use the target language effectively. Instead of applying traditional concepts of ESP in teaching grammar and vocabulary, ESP teachers should help build learners' abilities to communicate at the workplace and/or in academic settings (Cheng and Mok, 2008; Edwards, 2000; Evans, 2011; Kithulgoda and Mendis, 2020; Perrin, 2003; Ponger, 2003; Taillefer, 2007). Regarding L2 pedagogy, the classroom practice should include grammar teaching, error correction and assessment, target language use, cross-cultural issues, application of technologies, and communicative language teaching strategies (Brown, 2009; Levine, 2003; Schulz, 2001).
Exploring the potential of process-tracing technologies to support assessment for learning of L2 writing
2018, Assessing WritingCitation Excerpt :Despite their varied forms, WP visualizations typically convey information about the timing and location of writing behaviors of interest. They include written text marked up with special symbols, known as S-notation (Severinson Eklundh & Kollberg, 1996); timelines combining keystroke and eye-tracking information (Wengelin et al., 2009), progression diagrams showing number of revisions as a function of both timing and location (Perrin, 2003); dynamic, GIS-based representations (Lindgren, Sullivan, Lindgren, & Spellman Miller, 2007); and graph visualizations resembling network diagrams (Caporossi & Leblay, 2011). One issue in the design of WP visualizations is how to achieve sufficient amounts of macro- and micro-level detail so as to support analysis of larger trends (e.g., to see how much time was allocated to formulation versus revision) while also allowing text-level views (e.g., to see what type of revision was made at a particular point in time).
Interacting with Next-Phrase Suggestions: How Suggestion Systems Aid and Influence the Cognitive Processes of Writing
2023, International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI