Removal of VOCs from waste gas streams by permeation in a hollow fiber permeator

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00322-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Vapor permeation-separation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from N2 feed gas at atmospheric pressure was studied using microporous polypropylene hollow fibers having ultrathin plasma-polymerized nonporous silicone skin on the outside surface. The operational mode in the membrane module was that of the feed gas flowing through the fiber bore (the nonskin side) and vacuum on the shell side. The VOCs investigated were toluene, methanol, acetone and methylene chloride. The feed gas flow rate range was 0.5–12 cm3 min−1 per fiber. The VOC concentration ranged 500-51,700 ppmv. The other operational mode of feed gas on the shell side and vacuum on the tube side was also studied for toluene and methanol; it was found to be considerably inferior to the nonconventional tube-side feed mode, primarily investigated here. The latter mode easily achieved 98% VOC removal at lower gas flow rates, e.g. 0.5 cm3 min−1 per fiber. In the tube-side feed mode, the improved performance is due to the absence of pressure drops in the porous substrate and tube-side permeate flow, encountered in the shell-side mode. Possible pore condensation of the VOCs at higher feed concentrations may have also contributed to an increased VOC permeation and considerable reduction in N2 permeation. A much smaller hollow fiber module was used to measure separately the permeance of each VOC, toluene and methanol. They were found to vary exponentially as a function of VOC concentration. Such an exponential concentration dependence of VOC permeance has been introduced into two models — one analytical, another numerical — for predicting VOC permeation-removal in the longer hollow fiber module. Results from both models well describe the observed VOC removal.

References (19)

  • I. Pinnau et al.

    Gas permeation through composite membranes

    J. Membrane Sci.

    (1988)
  • R.W. Baker et al.

    On membrane vapor separation versus carbon adsorption

  • R.W. Baker et al.

    Membrane fractionation process

    (July 16, 1991)
  • X. Feng et al.

    Separation of volatile organic compound/nitrogen mixtures by polymeric membranes

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (1993)
  • MTR, Membrane Technology and Research, Inc.

    Vapor-SepTM Systems

    (1988)
  • K. Kimmerle et al.

    Solvent recovery from air

    J. Membrane Sci.

    (1988)
  • H. Strathmann et al.

    Development of synthetic membranes for gas and vapor separation

    Pure Appl. Chem.

    (1986)
  • R.D. Behling et al.

    The separation of hydrocarbons from waste vapor streams

  • S. Majumdar

    A New Liquid Membrane Technique for Gas Separation

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (52)

  • A photodriven energy efficient membrane process for trace VOC removal from air: First step to a smart approach

    2021, Chemical Engineering Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    The application of high pressure in the retentate side and/or reduced pressure on the permeate side increases the separation efficiency at the expense of energy cost [11,12]. Cha et al. [6] and Majumdar et al. [11] have shown that it is possible to efficiently separate very low VOCs concentration (10 to 100 ppm) from air using hollow fiber membrane modules. However, these results were obtained by applying a high vacuum on the permeate side.

  • Synthetic polymeric membranes for gas and vapor separations

    2020, Synthetic Polymeric Membranes for Advanced Water Treatment, Gas Separation, and Energy Sustainability
  • Separation of organic compounds from gaseous mixtures by vapor permeation

    2019, Separation and Purification Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The scheme of the process (Fig. 2) is similar to that of hybrid separation (Fig. 1). Capture of hydrocarbon vapors close to gas refueling stations [16,22,125]. Various applications exist, because hydrocarbon capture from the air is currently very attractive.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Present address: National Institute of Environmental Research, Motor Vehicle Emission Research Laboratory, Eunpyung-Gu, Bulgwang-Dong 280-17, Seoul, South Korea.

2

Present address: Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052, USA.

3

Present address: Inteplast Corporation, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA.

View full text