Modeling and simulation of clean fuel production by Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00017-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Cell growth and substrate degradation kinetics of newly isolated Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08 were investigated with the help of Monod model. The values of μmax, KS and YX/S of the cell were 0.568 h−1, 3.658 g l−1 and 0.0837, respectively, using glucose as a substrate. The simulated profiles of the substrate concentration and cell mass concentration had significant variance with respect to the experimental values. This might be due to the substrate inhibition as the product is a gas. A modified Andrew’s model for substrate inhibition was suggested and found to have good resemblance with the experimental results. In other studies, hydrogen production was found to be growth associated.

Introduction

The economic growth of modern industrialized society has been based on the utilization of fossil fuels like natural gas, coal, and petroleum as the energy sources. However, limited fossil fuel resources have led to a search for alternative sources of energy. Hydrogen is a potent alternative because there are no liabilities like emissions, spills, CO2, global warming, acid rains, etc. which are associated with traditional fossil fuels. Hydrogen is a very important molecule with an enormous extent of applications and uses. It is currently being used in many industries ranging from chemical and refining to metallurgical, glass, and electronics. Hydrogen is primarily used as reactant and it is also being used as fuel, particularly in space application for the last 40 years. Various ways of producing hydrogen are available e.g., steam reforming of natural gas, thermal cracking, electrolysis of water, etc.

Many authors have investigated biological hydrogen production [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. In general, there are two ways to produce hydrogen using living organisms, first, by photosynthetic organisms (such as photosynthetic bacteria, cyanobacteria, and green algae), and second, by fermentative organisms (strict anaerobes and facultative anaerobes). Comparative studies on different micro-organisms with respect to hydrogen production show that the rate of fermentative hydrogen production is always faster than the other biological methods. The other advantages of fermentative hydrogen production are mainly to produce it all day long without light and also able to clean environment by using industrial and agricultural waste thus facilitating waste recycling.

It was observed that hydrogen production rates and yields were comparatively higher in case of Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT08 than those reported in literature for similar processes [8], [9], [10]. To realize the complete advantages of the proposed system, modeling of the system has to be done, so that scale-up of the process can be accomplished. Therefore, a kinetic model representing the cell mass growth, substrate degradation, and product formation, is sought to be developed.

Section snippets

Micro-organism and culture condition

Micro-organism used in the present study was Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT08, isolated from leaf extract and characterized [8], [9], [10]. The strain was routinely maintained aerobically on nutrient agar by weakly transfer under aseptic condition to the slants and growing at 37°C. For hydrogen production, the seed culture was prepared by aerobic growth of the strain in pre-culture media [8] for a period of 10 h at 37°C. The production media contained 1% malt extract, 0.4% yeast extract and 1%

Cell growth kinetics

Cell growth is initially investigated based on simple Monod kinetics [12].μ=μmaxSKS+SEq. (1) may be linearised to find out the kinetic parameters with the help of Lineweaver–Burk plot:1μ=KSμmaxS+1μmaxRegression analysis is used to find the best fit for a straight line on a plot of 1/μ vs 1/S to determine the values of μmax and KS.

Simulation of cell mass concentration and substrate concentration profiles

Now,dXdT=μX=μmaxSKS+S·XNow, YX/S is the cell mass growth/mass of substrate consumed which is given as YX/S=dX/dSAssuming YX/S constant throughout the fermentation, the

Results and discussion

A new facultative anaerobe has been isolated and characterized as Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08 [8], [9], [10]. The most favorable conditions for the Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08 strain to produce hydrogen were reported as pH of 5–6 and a temperature of 32–40°C in the growth medium comprising 1% malt extract, 1% glucose or 1% sucrose, and 0.4% yeast extract. This organism was found suitable for hydrogen production using different carbon sources other than glucose and sucrose such as

Conclusion

Substrate inhibition model using glucose as a substrate was found suitable for hydrogen generating system as compared to that of using Monod model.A modified Andrew’s model for the substrate inhibition has been proposed and found suitable for the existing system. Hydrogen production was found to be a growth associate product. However, the effect of maintenance energy on the growth of the cells, the effect of other carbon sources, etc. play important role in hydrogen generating system. These

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for the financial support.

References (15)

  • H. Yokoi et al.

    Characteristics of hydrogen production by aciduric Enterobacter aerogenes strain HO-39

    J Ferment Bioeng.

    (1995)
  • N. Kumar et al.

    Enhancement of hydrogen production by Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08

    Process Biochem.

    (2000)
  • S. Tanisho et al.

    Fermentative hydrogen evolution from various substrates by Enterobacter aerogenes

    Hakkokogaku

    (1989)
  • M. Heyndricky et al.

    Effect of external factors on the fermentative production of hydrogen gas from glucose by Clostridium butyricum strains in batch culture system

    Appl Microbiol.

    (1987)
  • T. Fumiaki et al.

    Hydrogen production from continuous fermentation of xylose during growth of Clostridium sp. strain no. 2

    Can J. Microbiol.

    (1995)
  • J. Benemann

    Hydrogen biotechnology: progress and prospects

    Nature Biotechnol.

    (1996)
  • C.T. Gray et al.

    Biological formation of molecular hydrogen

    Science

    (1965)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text