Optimum utilization of feed resources: model studies and farmers' practices in two villages in East Java, Indonesia
Introduction
The potential for livestock production depends largely on the availability of feed. Traditional feed balance studies, comparing the amount of feed with the requirements for the actual animal production, indicate that in many regions large amounts of feed are left unutilized (Winrock, 1978). This is because many feeds are of very low quality, so that farmers must select and use only the better feeds. In a study on animal production in the province of East Java, Indonesia, Zemmelink et al. (1992) used the so-called JAVA programme to calculate the effect of varying degrees of selection, i.e. varying degrees of feed utilization on (a) the number of animals that can be fed ad libitum, (b) the corresponding production per animal and (c) the total production of the herd [combination of (a) and (b)]. They concluded, that maximum animal production was reached when only 35% of the feed dry matter was utilized. This value and also calculated values for optimum herd size and corresponding productivity of animals, corresponded well with actual data according to national statistics. In that study, the feed table (list of amounts and qualities of different feeds) for the whole province was the input for the programme. Calculations assumed that all feeds were available in the whole region and evenly distributed throughout the year. Regional differences, as well as seasonal distribution of feeds were ignored. In practice, the total amount of feed and the proportion of individual feeds vary between regions and villages, and also between seasons, depending on the distribution of rainfall and cropping patterns. Farmers try to mitigate the effects of seasonal fluctuations by carrying over feed from one season to another, but this is difficult with perishable green feeds. It is also not possible to adjust herd size from month to month, while a fixed herd size leads to shortage of feed in one season, or excess in another, or both. This paper presents model results for two villages where the total quantity of feed and the proportion of individual feeds show a large seasonal variation. The objective of the study was to arrive at quantitative estimates of (a) the effects of selective utilization of feeds, (b) the monthly variation in optimum herd size and (c) the optimum constant herd size for both villages, taking into account restrictions to the utilization of individual feeds and possible carrying over of feeds from one season to another. Results are compared with farmers' practices.
Section snippets
Study area
The two villages (Putukrejo and Kedungsalam) are in the limestone area of South Malang regency, East Java, Indonesia (see Cornelissen et al., 1997). The climate in this area is mainly determined by the tropical monsoon. The wet season usually starts in October or November and ends between April and July. Annual rainfall (measured in Pagak) varies from 1130 to 2700 mm with a 32-year average of 1900 mm. In 30% of the years there was a pronounced dry season lasting 7–11 months.
Putukrejo is in a
Feed tables, farmers' practices and livestock population
Table 1 gives the estimated amounts of individual feeds for each of the three seasons mentioned above and the average nutritive value (NV) of each feed. Amounts available per month are in Ifar (1996). Seasonal and between-village variation in the NV of individual forages was small compared with differences between forages. This was also true for grass, because farmers select, and even in the dry season most of the grass harvested is green. Therefore overall mean values per feed were used in the
Comparison of response curves and farmers' practices
The model calculations for Putukrejo indicate, that when a choice has to be made between feeding supplementary straw in May or November, priority should be given to supplementation in May. This is in agreement with farmers' practices. The calculations also suggest that a similar extra increase in TLWP could be obtained by feeding rice straw in both May and November. This was not done by farmers. There is, however, also an essential difference in the manner in which the two increases in TLWP are
Conclusions
- 1.
Seasonal distribution and selective utilization of feeds are important factors which must be taken into account when studying ruminant production systems and evaluating farmers' practices.
- 2.
Taking into account the results of model calculations for a year with average rainfall, in combination with variation in rainfall between years, it is concluded that farmers in both Putukrejo and Kedungsalam adapt feeding practices and herd size remarkably well to the resources at their disposal. The results
References (12)
- et al.
The relevance of animal power for land cultivation in upland areas: a case study in East Java, Indonesia
Agricultural Systems
(1997) - et al.
A computerised method for systematically analysing the livestock component of farming systems
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
(1993) - Agricultural Research Council (ARC), 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural...
- Brewbaker, J.L., 1986. Leguminous trees and shrubs for Southeast Asia and the South Pacific. In: Blair, G.J., Ivory,...
- Doyle, P.T., Oosting, S.J., 1995. Variation in quantity and quality of crop residues: a summary review. In: Joshi,...
- Hegarty, M.P., Lowry. J.B., Tangendjaja, B., 1986. Toxins in forages. In: Blair, G.J., Ivory, D.A., Evans, T.R. (Eds.),...
Cited by (5)
Feed resources, livestock production and soil carbon dynamics in Teghane, Northern Highlands of Ethiopia
2007, Agricultural SystemsEstimation of Optimum Utilization of Ruminant Feed Resources on Tropical Dry-Land during Dry and Rainy Seasons
2022, Iranian Journal of Applied Animal ScienceNutrient intake of lactating dairy cows during the wet and dry seasons in Sleman, Yogyakarta
2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental ScienceMicroenvironment identification and the feed availability for dairy cows during dry and wet seasons in the main dairy areas of Yogyakarta – Indonesia
2019, Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology