Elsevier

Marine Chemistry

Volume 57, Issues 3–4, July 1997, Pages 187-193
Marine Chemistry

Pyrite formation under conditions approximating those in anoxic sediments: II. Influence of precursor iron minerals and organic matter

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(97)00050-9Get rights and content

Abstract

In the paper (Wang and Morse, 1996) that preceded this study, we presented results of experiments performed using a silica gel crystal growth technique to produce pyrite under conditions approximating those commonly occurring in anoxic marine sediments. The primary focus of that study was on the chemical pathways that pyrite formation follows and how differing conditions influenced reaction kinetics and morphology of pyrite crystals. In this paper, we present results of further long-term (up to 1 y) studies of pyrite formation, using the silica gel experimental technique, in which we investigated the role that different precursor iron (hydr)oxide minerals and marine organic matter play in pyrite formation. The minerals studied were akaganeite (β-FeOOH), ferrihydrite (Fe5HO8 · 4H2O), goethite (α-FeOOH), hematite (α-Fe2O3), lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH), and magnetite (Fe3O4). Marine organic matter used in this study was freeze-dried plankton collected from near-surface water in the Gulf of Mexico. The influence of precursor iron (hydr)oxide mineralogy, although important for initial iron sulfidization rates, was relatively minor compared to other variables, such as solution pH and sulfide concentration, in controlling the rate of pyrite formation. Consequently, major variations in the observed rate of pyritization of different iron (hydr)oxide minerals in sediments (e.g., Canfield and Berner, 1987) may reflect large differences in surface areas of the minerals rather than their intrinsic reactivity and is a confirmation of the estimates of Canfield et al. (1992) that most iron oxides have similar reactivity. The presence of marine organic matter (freeze-dried plankton) caused an increase in the sulfidization rate of goethite and a major (about 20 ×) decrease in the rate of pyrite formation. This can be interpreted as indicating that organic matter-iron interactions are important in both iron (hydr)oxide dissolution, and pyrite nucleation and growth. A possible explanation for this behavior is that dissolved organic matter produced during the long experiments (up to 1 year) increased the rate of goethite dissolution while inhibiting pyrite nucleation and growth by complexing iron. The lessons learned in the study of other mineral reaction kinetics (e.g., calcite and aragonite), that rates determined in pure inorganic systems, may not always be reliably applied to natural systems where organic matter can significantly influence mineral dissolution and growth rates, are, alas, repeated here for pyrite.

Reference (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text