The evolution of the DGR approach to model electron density profiles
Abstract
The paper describes the evolution of the “profiler” proposed by Di Giovanni and Radicella (1990) to calculate the electron density distribution with height up to the F2 peak based on the Epstein layer introduced originally by Rawer. Such model uses ionospheric characteristics routinely scaled from ionograms or models of such characteristics. Radicella and Zhang (1995) presented an improved version of the profiler able to give the electron density distribution on both the bottom and topside of the ionosphere and the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) by introducing a constant shape factor for the semi-Epstein layer above the F2 peak. This version of the DGR model was adopted by the European COST 238 action as the basis for its regional model of the ionosphere. Further efforts were made to improve the topside part of the profiler by taking into account the contribution of the plasmaspherie electron density. The three separate solutions that have been implemented are described. One of them was adopted by the European COST 251 as basis for its regional ionospheric model. Another one developed partially with European Space Agency (ESA) support has been adopted in the ESA European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System project ionospheric specifications. A modified version of this profiler has been implemented to forecast TEC values over Europe as a joint effort with the CLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in the United Kingdom and the Geophysical Institute, Sofia, Bulgaria.
References (7)
- G. Di Giovanni et al.
An analytical model of the electron density profile in the ionosphere
Adv. Space Res.
(1990) - G. Hochegger et al.
A Family of Ionospheric Models for Different Uses, Physics And Chemistry Of The Earth
Solar, Terrestrial & Planetary Science
(2000) - R. Leitinger
A magnetic field aligned approach to model the topside F2 layer
Adv. Space Res.
(1998)
Cited by (269)
A simulation study of the Argo program-enhanced global ionospheric modeling
2024, Advances in Space ResearchThe ionospheric total electron content (TEC) is a critical parameter for space weather and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) applications. Since 1998, the Ionospheric Working Group of the International GNSS Service (IGS) has been generating global ionospheric maps using data from hundreds of GNSS stations. However, the uneven geographical distribution of these observations has resulted in significant variations in TEC map accuracy, particularly in marine areas where observations are scarce or absent. In this study, we introduce Argo data as additional observations to enhance the accuracy of global ionospheric modeling. Argo data consists of measurements collected by more than 1,000 robotic floats deployed across the world's oceans. By utilizing the NeQuick model and considering the geographic coordinates of both IGS stations and Argo buoys, we simulate the ionospheric Slant Total Electron Content (STEC). This approach allows us to examine the impact of integrating Argo data into global ionospheric modeling and evaluate its effectiveness. The results indicate a significant improvement in the overall accuracy of the model after incorporating Argo data. Furthermore, by increasing the model's degree, a better global fit is achieved. It eliminates noticeable overestimation or underestimation of TEC, especially evident at a degree of 30. As the availability and uniform distribution of observations improve, the model demonstrates higher accuracy and enhanced global performance.
Simultaneous monitoring of the limited area ionosphere with the use of GPS and ionosonde
2024, Advances in Space ResearchThe importance of this study lies in its contribution to the field of ionospheric science, particularly in the monitoring and prediction of ionospheric parameters. This study focuses on comparing two techniques for spatio-temporal kriging of critical ionospheric parameters, namely the F2 layer critical frequency (foF2) and Total Electron Content (TEC), under both quiet and disturbed ionospheric conditions. The first technique, Ordinary Kriging (OK), relies solely on foF2 data, while the second technique, Kriging with External Drift (KED), incorporates the dynamic relationship between foF2 and TEC data to improve the interpolation process. This study demonstrates how KED, which utilizes dynamic secondary information, offers advantages over OK. By simultaneously monitoring the ionosphere from a single ionosonde station and collecting data from visible GPS satellites, KED enhances the accuracy of spatial structural analysis, enabling more precise estimations of ionospheric characteristics across interpolation grid nodes. The research highlights that the non-uniform distribution of ionosonde stations, especially in regions with limited foF2 data, can benefit from KED's incorporation of TEC data. Additionally, the study reveals the potential for improving TEC maps by assimilating foF2 data located at the periphery of the observation area. Furthermore, the paper discusses the determination of semivariogram structures for both foF2 and TEC data, emphasizing the spatial correlations between data points. These findings contribute to a better understanding of ionospheric behavior and the potential for enhanced ionospheric modeling.
A storm-time global electron density reconstruction model in three-dimensions based on artificial neural networks
2024, Advances in Space ResearchWe present results of a dedicated global storm-time model for the reconstruction of ionospheric electron density in three-dimensions. Using the storm criterion of nT and , the model is constructed using a combination of radio occultation and ionosonde data during the periods of 2006–2021 and 2000–2020, respectively. From the ionosonde data, only the bottomside electron density profiles up to the maximum height of the F2 layer (hmF2) are considered. In addition to the selection of storm-time data only for the model development, we have investigated the inclusion of time history for the geomagnetic storm indicator Kp at 9 and 33 h in an attempt to take into account the delay of physical processes related to atmospheric gravity waves or traveling ionospheric disturbances and thermospheric composition changes which drive varying ionospheric storm effects during storm conditions. Based on incoherent scatter radar data and in comparison with the IRI 2020 model, the developed storm-time model provides foF2 modelling improvement of above 50% during the storm main phase over Millstone Hill (42.6N, 71.5W) and Tromsø (69.6N, 19.2E) for the storm periods of 3–6 November 2021 and 23–25 March 2023, respectively. Modelled results for Jicamarca (11.8S, 77.2W) show that the storm-time model estimates foF2 by an improvement of over 20% during the main phase of the 07–10 September 2017 storm period. As the ionospheric conditions return to quiet time levels, the IRI 2020 model perform better than the constructed storm -time model
Validation of a neural network based model to predict foF2
2024, Advances in Space ResearchThis work presents the application of Neural Networks (NNs) techniques to develop an empirical model for foF2, the critical frequency of the F2 ionospheric layer. Prediction of foF2 parameter is important because of the paucity of data in some areas of the globe (due to uneven distributions of ground- based measuring equipment) and, also, because of the roles it plays in high frequency communications and navigation purposes. Hourly values of foF2 corresponding to the period 1985–2007 and obtained from 105 World-wide distributed ionospheric stations, have been considered in this work. A statistical analysis of the difference between NN model-derived and the corresponding experimental foF2 values was carried out for eleven (11) selected ionospheric stations during periods of very high (year 2000), relatively low (year 2006) and very low (year 2008) solar activity. In particular, the ionospheric behavior during the years 2000 and 2008 appeared to be very challenging to be captured for any empirical model. For comparison purposes, the same kind of statistical analysis was performed with foF2 values as obtained from the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model and from NeQuick 2 model. Results of the statistical comparison confirmed that the neural network modelling approach is suitable to describe in a climatological way the main characteristics of the ionosphere F2 layer peak frequency, also over the extended geographic region where the additional sensor stations were located. The results obtained also indicate that the NN predictions and NeQuick 2 algorithm driven by solar flux (F10.7) index have similar performance.
On the low-latitude NeQuick topside ionosphere mismodelling: The role of parameters H<inf>0</inf>, g, and r
2023, Advances in Space ResearchThis paper deals with the well-known mismodelling characterizing the NeQuick topside ionosphere at low latitudes, i.e., the fact that the model keeps the two electron density humps typical of the equatorial ionization anomaly as the altitude increases from the height of the F2-layer electron density peak, without merging them in a single peak above the geomagnetic equator as expected. This is because the NeQuick topside ionosphere modelling strongly depends on several bottomside ionosphere parameters, which causes an essential coupling between the topside and the bottomside that in many cases behave differently. This means that this kind of topside ionosphere modelling may lead to inaccurate results, as it is the maintenance at low latitudes of the electron density double hump structure in the topside as the altitude increases. On the base of some recently published results, this paper analyzes the role played by the three NeQuick scale height parameters H0, g and r in the description of the electron density above the F2 layer peak height. The results of this work pave the way for a possible solution of this low-latitude NeQuick topside ionosphere mismodelling.
Ionosphere variability II: Advances in theory and modeling
2023, Advances in Space ResearchThis paper aims to provide an overview on recent advances in ionospheric modeling capabilities, with the emphasis in the efforts relevant to electron density variability. The discussion spans a wide range of model formulations (e.g., from purely empirical to physics-based ones and data-driven approaches) seeking for advances or gaps with regard to present challenges. This discussion is further supported by consideration of the models' assessment and accessibility, as well as scientific advances that may drive further improvements in our modeling capabilities. Giving the emphasis in the period from 2015 onwards, the ultimate goal of the present analysis is to comment on progress with respect to the COSPAR/ILWS Space Weather roadmap's considerations/recommendations for 2015–2025 as input to the roadmap’s update undertaken by the ISWAT/COSPAR action.