The role of spatially explicit models in land-use change research: a case study for cropping patterns in China

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00184-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Single research methodologies do not suffice for a complete analysis of land-use change. Instead, a sequence of methodologies is needed that link up and integrate disciplinary components over a range of spatial and temporal scales. In this paper, a modelling methodology is presented aiming at the analysis of the spatial and temporal dynamics of land use at the regional level. The methodology explores the dynamic functioning of land-use systems, which is essential to bridge the gap between studies identifying problems associated with land-use change and studies aiming at understanding and manipulating land-use change processes. An illustration of the methodology is given for China where we have simulated a scenario of near-future (1991–2010) changes in land-use patterns. The methodology is adapted to include the nested simulation of different crop types in addition to the simulation of land-cover change. Results are presented for changes in the spatial distribution of cultivated land and special emphasis is given to shifts in the distribution of different crops. In the northern part of the country a decrease in the proportion wheat within the cropping system is expected whereas in the southern part the proportion of rice is decreasing. Corn and vegetable crops are expected to become more important within the cropping system in these parts of the country.

Introduction

The field of land-use change studies is strongly divided by scientific discipline, tradition and scale of analysis. Researchers in the social sciences have a long tradition of studying individual behaviour in human–environment interactions at the micro-scale, mostly by narrative approaches. At higher levels of aggregation, geographers and ecologists have studied land-use change either by direct observation, using remote sensing and GIS or have applied the systems/structures perspective to better understand the organisation of society and landscapes (Lambin et al., 1999).

Apart from these differences caused by scientific tradition and scale of analysis there are also inevitably large variations in research approach because of differences in research objectives and stakeholders addressed. Some of the studies aim at understanding (parts of) the land-use system dynamics by itself, while others aim at intervention in land-use dynamics by means of land-use planning or the designing of alternative land-use systems.

Intervention in the dynamics of land-use systems is impossible without a proper understanding of the driving factors in these systems and their behaviour. Such a complete analysis of systems as complex as land-use systems, is impossible with a single research methodology (Bouma, 1998). Therefore, different research approaches originating from different disciplinary backgrounds and different scales of analysis should not be considered in isolation but should rather be linked and inter-related following a logical sequence (Levin, 1992, Fresco, 1995, Rindfuss and Stern, 1998). This sequence of interconnected methodologies for studying land-use change research problems can be called a ‘research sequence’ in which the different research methodologies (‘tools’) are ordered according to their spatial scale of analysis and phase of research.

To fit existing research methodologies within such a research sequence, methodologies should be designed or adapted so that information and understanding obtained with a single research methodology is complementary to other methodologies operating at different scales and/or in different phases of research.

This paper discusses a research sequence for land-use change studies and elaborates on the use of a spatially explicit methodology for land-use change modelling within this research sequence. This methodology, the CLUE modelling framework (Veldkamp and Fresco, 1996, Verburg et al., 1999a) is designed to bridge the gap between different phases of a land-use change research sequence. An extension of this method, allowing the nested simulation of different crop types in addition to the simulation of land-cover types, is presented. An illustration of the method is provided for the exploration of possible shifts in land use and cropping patterns in China.

Section snippets

A research sequence for land-use change studies

This section gives an example of a typical research sequence which aims to achieve changes in the land-use system by steering specific characteristics of the system to avoid or decrease negative impacts of land-use changes. Fig. 1 illustrates this research chain by providing a logical sequence of the different tools ordered according to their scale of analysis.

Modelling framework

In this study, the CLUE modelling framework is used for the simulation of land-use changes (Veldkamp and Fresco, 1996, Verburg et al., 1999a). This modelling framework has the following characteristics:

  • All simulations are made in a spatially explicit way so that the geographical pattern of land-use change is resulting. The spatial resolution of the simulations is dependent on the extent of the study area and the resolution of data available for that study area. In the present application for

Scenario formulation

A baseline scenario is formulated to represent the most likely developments in demography and demand for land-use types and agricultural products in the near-future, i.e., the period 1991–2010. The demands for the different land-use types are based upon an extrapolation of trends and estimates of land-use change at the national level by Smil (1993) for the period 1990–2000. The resulting land areas of the different land-use types are shown in Table 2. It is assumed that cultivated land will

Discussion

The methodology presented in this paper fits well within the land-use change research sequence presented in Fig. 1. The identified niche of the methodology is regional with respect to the scale of study and belongs to the ‘system description phase’ of the research sequence. It directly links up with studies in earlier phases of the research sequence: trends in land demand, projected within studies that belong to the ‘problem identification phase’ of the research chain, are direct input for the

Conclusions

  • The CLUE methodology can provide important information needed for land-use planning in addition to insights obtained by existing research methodologies.

  • The inclusion of crop-specific simulations within the CLUE methodology enables a linkage of this methodology with crop suitability analysis and linear programming studies that aim at the design of alternative land-use configurations.

  • The multi-scale approach used is useful for studying complex systems such as the land-use system.

Acknowledgements

The research described in this paper is financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO/NOP-II). All persons and institutes who kindly made their data available for this analysis are acknowledged.

References (54)

  • K. Kok et al.

    A method and application of multi-scale validation in spatial land use models

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2001)
  • B. Mertens et al.

    Impact of macroeconomic change on deforestation in South Cameroon: integration of household survey and remotely sensed data

    World Dev.

    (2000)
  • A. Moxey et al.

    Agri-environmental indicators: issues and choices

    Land Use Policy

    (1998)
  • F. Müller

    Hierarchical approaches to ecosystem theory

    Ecol. Model.

    (1992)
  • C.J.M. Musters et al.

    Defining socio-environmental systems for sustainable development

    Ecol. Econ.

    (1998)
  • M.K. Van Ittersum et al.

    Exploratory land use studies and their role in strategic policy making

    Agric. Syst.

    (1998)
  • A. Veldkamp et al.

    CLUE-CR: an integrated multi-scale model to simulate land use change scenarios in Costa Rica

    Ecol. Model.

    (1996)
  • P.H. Verburg et al.

    Exploring changes in the spatial distribution of livestock in China

    Agric. Syst.

    (1999)
  • P.H. Verburg et al.

    A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use

    Ecol. Model.

    (1999)
  • P.H. Verburg et al.

    Simulation of changes in the spatial pattern of land use in China

    Appl. Geogr.

    (1999)
  • P.H. Verburg et al.

    Land use change under conditions of high population pressure: the case of Java

    Global Environ. Change

    (1999)
  • P.H. Verburg et al.

    Spatial explorations of land-use change and grain production in China

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2000)
  • P. Vereijken

    A methodological way of prototyping integrated and ecological arable farming systems (I/EAFS) in interaction with pilot farms

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (1997)
  • P. Zander et al.

    Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development

    Agric. Syst.

    (1999)
  • Achard, F., Eva, H., Glinni, A., Mayaux, P., Richards, T., Stibig, H.J., 1998. Identification of deforestation hot spot...
  • Bouma, J., 1998. Introduction. In: Stoorvogel, J.J., Bouma, J., Bowen, W.T. (Eds.), Proceedings of an International...
  • Brown, L.R., 1995. Who Will Feed China? Wake-up Call for a Small Planet. W.W. Norton, New...
  • Cited by (66)

    • Farmland transition in China and its policy implications

      2020, Land Use Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Bertoni et al. (2018) used the “Markov Chains Approach” to explore the impact of common agricultural policy on farmland use transitions in Italy and found that the new rules have a strong effect on regions with high-intensity agriculture. Some scholars believed that population increase, urban expansion and agricultural land occupation for construction are the key factors influencing the transformation of farmland (Qu et al., 2019; Verburg and Veldkamp, 2001; Enaruvbe et al., 2019). Farmland transitions can be caused by negative socio-ecological feedbacks; however, the change in farmland will have an impact on planting patterns, food crop yield, as well as national or regional food supplies (Skinner et al., 2001; Radel et al., 2019; Bettinger and Merry, 2019).

    • The 1985 siting of a Toyota manufacturing plant in rural Kentucky, USA: The ensuing land use change and implications for planning

      2017, Landscape and Urban Planning
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, availability of adequate and/or sophisticated land use and related spatial datasets in small towns and rural areas pose a serious challenge for longitudinal studies that expand over decades. Nevertheless, with improvements in computing speed, capacity, and performance and availability of advanced Geographic Information System (GIS) and remote sensing techniques, assessment of spatial and temporal patterns of conversion of rural lands for development of new industrial, commercial and residential uses are increasingly becoming popular (Agarwal, Green, Grove, Evans, & Schwelk, 2000; Guan et al., 2011; Mitsova, Shuster, & Wang, 2011; Verburg & Veldkamp, 2001). More specifically, in this paper, we look at one example, that of the Toyota plant that located near Georgetown, Kentucky in 1985.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text