Estimating the abundance of Patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides using baited cameras: a preliminary study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00264-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The Patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides has been the object of a rapidly expanding longline fishery in the Southern Ocean. Little is known about the biology of D. eleginoides and traditional methods of estimating stock size using trawling techniques have proved ineffective because the adult fish are found in deep waters on the continental slope at depths of 700–2500 m. During September 1997, a preliminary study was undertaken using arrival times at an autonomous baited camera vehicle, the Aberdeen University Deep Ocean Submersible (AUDOS), to estimate the abundance and size of toothfish in waters around South Georgia (SG) and the Falkland Islands (FI). These are the first attempts at estimating the abundance of toothfish that are independent of catch data from the commercial fishery.

Introduction

The Patagonian toothfish, Dissostichus eleginoides Smitt, 1898, is a commercially important species caught with longlines in the Southern Ocean. It belongs to the family Nototheniidae, the so-called Antarctic cods. It is distributed around the southern coast of Chile, the Patagonian shelf, and the sub-Antarctic islands of Kerguelen, South Georgia, and Macquarie at depths of 70–2500 m (DeWitt et al., 1990, Kock et al., 1985, Kock, 1992).

The biology of toothfish is poorly known, but it is thought to be a relatively long-lived benthopelagic or midwater species. In the Patagonian area spawning of the large pelagic eggs (diameters of 4.3–4.7 mm) is believed to take place on the continental slope at about 500 m depth, with hatching occurring between August and November (Kock, 1993). The juveniles probably remain pelagic for a year until they reach 15–20 cm TL when they become demersal (Kellermann, 1990). Sub-adult fish (<50 cm TL) are frequently caught in trawls as an incidental bycatch on the Patagonian shelf (Des Clers et al., 1996), particularly in the squid fishery for Loligo gahi (pers. obs.), though the adults are confined to the deeper waters of the continental slope. Sexual maturity in the females is reached at a size of 90–100 cm TL (9–12 years), whereas males mature at 64–94 cm TL (7–11 years) (DeWitt et al., 1990, Zhivov and Krivoruchko, 1990). Adults may attain total lengths in excess of 220 cm (Falkland Islands Government (FIG), 1998, unpublished data).

A commercial longline fishery for toothfish began around South Georgia in 1989, prior to which toothfish were caught mainly as a bycatch in trawls. Between 1988 and 1989, Soviet vessels reported catches of 4136 t of toothfish, and 8311 t in the subsequent year (CCAMLR, 1998). As a consequence of these high catches, the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) established annual total allowable catches of around 3000 t for South Georgia (CCAMLR Subarea 48.3). A more recent licensed longline fishery has operated in the Falkland Islands Outer Conservation Zone (FOCZ) since 1994, with catches of nearly 3000 t in 1994 and 1995 (Falkland Islands Government, 1997). The longliners use either the Spanish system or an automated system baited with sardines or squid, usually fishing at depths of 1000–2000 m.

In order to manage the toothfish stocks effectively, an accurate estimate of abundance is essential. Concern has been expressed about the ability of the toothfish stocks to withstand high catch levels. Previous attempts at modelling the population dynamics of toothfish have been based on fishery catch and effort data. However, the very high variability in the catch per unit effort between vessels targeting toothfish has meant that conventional assessment methods using depletion models are proving difficult to apply (see Des Clers et al., 1996). Traditional methods of estimating stock size using trawl swept area techniques are fraught with difficulties owing to rough topography and the depths at which toothfish are found. Therefore, alternative methods of assessment must now be considered.

Priede and Merrett (1996) demonstrated that the mean first arrival time of scavenging fish to bait could be used to obtain an estimate of abundance. This method, however, requires knowledge of both current velocity and fish swimming speed, as well as an understanding of the spatial distribution of the species. The Aberdeen University Deep Ocean Submersible (AUDOS) is an autonomous lander that has been used to investigate the biology and behaviour of deep-sea fish in the North Pacific and Atlantic Oceans (Armstrong et al., 1991, Armstrong et al., 1992, Collins et al., 1998). The aim of the present study was to test the feasibility of using the AUDOS to estimate the abundance of toothfish around South Georgia and the Falkland Islands independent of fishery data. Fish tracking was also undertaken in the Falkland Islands in an attempt to determine swimming speeds of toothfish necessary for calculating abundance.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The AUDOS was deployed on 18 occasions around South Georgia in September 1997 from the F.V. “Argos Galicia”, a commercial stern trawler chartered for a scientific groundfish survey of the area (Fig. 1, Table 1). These deployments were located at random around the 1000 m isobath. A further nine deployments were made in the FOCZ in known toothfish longlining grounds from the Falklands Fishery Protection Vessel M.V. “Cordella” in October 1997 (Fig. 2, Table 2).

Results

Numbers and first arrival times of toothfish and several species of crabs from South Georgia (SG) and the Falkland Islands (FI) are given in Table 1, Table 2. Some problems with camera failure were encountered during the South Georgia cruise, so that only 13 of these deployments were successful. The shallowest deployment made at South Georgia was at 269 m within the entrance to Cumberland Bay and did not form part of the survey; moreover, the extremely high suspended sediment load in the water

Discussion

The mean first arrival times of toothfish to the bait at 59 and 237 min for FI and SG deployments, respectively, imply low abundances, particularly around South Georgia. It is likely that toothfish had arrived earlier but were not photographed either because of the 1 min interval between frames, or because the fish were outside of the field of view. In many of the frames with toothfish present, only part of the individual was visible with usually just the head or the tail in view.

The absence of

Conclusion

It is not certain whether the difference in the calculated toothfish abundance between Falklands waters and South Georgia is significant. A higher density of toothfish was calculated in the FOCZ, even though commercial longliners were fishing close by at the same time. Clearly, further work is required to determine if this difference is a real feature, perhaps resulting from the longer period of commercial longlining that has occurred around South Georgia. Heavy exploitation around South

Acknowledgements

Dr. Phil Bagley and Steve Addison (University of Aberdeen) provided technical expertise on the AUDOS. Thanks to the crews of the F.V. “Argos Galicia” and the M.V. “Cordella” for their assistance in the handling of AUDOS. Dr. Nigel Merrett and Martin White assisted in species identifications. Crag Jones (Marine Resources Assessment Group, Imperial College, London), Dave Currie (Scantron), Adam Cockwell (Argos Ltd.), and Joost Pompert (FIG Fisheries Department) provided logistic support. This

References (28)

  • I.G. Priede et al.

    Foraging behaviour of abyssal grenadier fish: inferences from acoustic tagging and tracking in the North Pacific Ocean

    Deep-Sea Res.

    (1990)
  • K.L. Smith et al.

    Abyssopelagic fauna in the central North Pacific: comparison of acoustic detection and trawl and baited trap collections to 5800 m

    Deep-Sea Res.

    (1992)
  • J.D. Armstrong et al.

    Temporal change in foraging behaviour of the fish Coryphaenoides (Nematonurus) yaquinae in the central North Pacific

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (1991)
  • J.D. Armstrong et al.

    Photographic and acoustic tracking observations of the behaviour of the grenadier Coryphaenoides (Nematonurus) armatus, the eel Synaphobranchus bathybius, and other abyssal demersal fish in the North Atlantic Ocean

    Mar. Biol.

    (1992)
  • Bagley, P.M., 1992. A code-activated transponder for the individual identification and tracking of deep-sea fish. In:...
  • P.M. Bagley et al.

    An autonomous free-fall acoustic tracking system for investigation of fish behaviour at abyssal depths

    Aquat. Living Resour.

    (1997)
  • M. Basson et al.

    Management and assessment options for the crab fishery around South Georgia

    CCAMLR Sci.

    (1994)
  • G.I. Campodonico

    Research on the biology and fishery of the Chilean southern king crab and the false king crab prospects and problems

    Can. Transl. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1983)
  • CCAMLR, 1998. CCAMLR Statistical Bulletin, Vol. 10. Fisheries data 1988–1997,...
  • M.A. Collins et al.

    Acoustic tracking of the dispersal of organic matter by scavenging fishes in the deep-sea

    Hydrobiologia

    (1998)
  • M.A. Collins et al.

    Behavioural observations on the scavenging fauna of the Patagonian slope.

    J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK,

    (1999)
  • Des Clers, S., Nolan, C.P., Baranowski, R., Pompert, J., 1996. Preliminary stock assessment of the Patagonian toothfish...
  • DeWitt, H., Heemstra, P.C., Gon, O., 1990. Nototheniidae. In: Gon, O., Heemstra, P.C. (Eds.), Fishes of the Southern...
  • Falkland Islands Government, 1997. Fisheries Statistics, Vol. 1. Fisheries Department, 75...
  • Cited by (26)

    • Faunal behavior in response to near bottom water dynamics in a marine protected area (Cantabrian Sea, southern Bay of Biscay)

      2022, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, repeated standardized experiments can partially solve these problems and be an additional tool for monitoring a MPA. Baited cameras have been demonstrated to perform well in both reefs and shallow areas (Eliis and DeMartini, 1995; Willis et al., 2000; Stoner et al., 2008) and in deep sea (Priede et al., 1990; Priede and Merrett, 1996; Yau et al., 2001; King et al., 2006). Most species observed in the present study have been reported in previous studies using baited cameras in the Bay of Biscay (Guennegan and Rannou, 1979; Mahau et al., 1990), in adjacent deepwater areas (Priede I et al., 1994; Bagley et al., 1994; Jones et al., 1998; Linley et al., 2016), or in the Mediterranean Sea (Jones et al., 2003; D'Onghia et al., 2004; Linley et al., 2018).

    • Evaluating the effect of soak time on bottomfish abundance and length data from stereo-video surveys

      2016, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The emergence of underwater video-survey techniques in fisheries science has given researchers the ability to move beyond fishery-dependent data and reduce some of the restrictions of depth, habitat, and fish behavior inherent to diver and fishing surveys (Cappo et al., 2007). By generating standardized species-specific estimates of fish abundance that have been found to positively correlate with fish density (Ellis and DeMartini, 1995; Priede and Merrett, 1996; Willis et al., 2000; Willis and Babcock, 2000; Yau et al., 2001; Cappo et al., 2003; Stoner et al., 2008), baited camera systems have proven to be a valuable tool in spatial (e.g. Westera et al., 2003; Moore et al., 2013), temporal (e.g. Denny et al., 2004; Sackett et al., 2014), and ecological (e.g. Gledhill et al., 2005; Misa et al., 2013) surveys of fish assemblages. Furthermore, underwater camera systems offer a non-extractive alternative to traditional research fishing methods, which make them ideal for studying marine protected areas (e.g. Cappo et al., 2003; Willis et al., 2003; Sackett et al., 2014) and conducting monitoring programs (Murphy and Jenkins, 2010).

    • The Patagonian Toothfish. Biology, Ecology and Fishery

      2010, Advances in Marine Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      They used an autonomous camera system (see Section 10) and attempted to calculate toothfish density based on mean first arrival time, as demonstrated by Priede and Merrett (1996). Yau et al. (2001) data gave estimates of 0.4 and 1.32 toothfish per km2 for South Georgia and the Falkland Islands, respectively. However, the behaviour of the toothfish differed from other scavenging species to which the method had previously been applied, leaving considerable uncertainty about the results.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text