A novel device for capturing breath samples for solvent analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(97)05483-1Get rights and content

Abstract

We have developed a novel breath sampling device suitable for capturing a portion of end-tidal air. This breath sample is then transferred onto a Perkin Elmer automated thermal desorption (ATD) sampling tube which is subsequently analysed by ATD-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS). The breath sampler has been evaluated in the laboratory, in brief field trials and in human volunteer studies. The method is sensitive with a typical detection limit of 1 nmol/l and reproducible with an overall coefficient of variation between 5% and 15% for collection and analysis of breath samples from volunteers. The field trials used the sampler to assess exposure to solvents in several industries including the shoe manufacturing industry, the inks and coatings industry and at dry cleaning establishments. The sampler was found easy to use and reliable. Solvents detected include ethyl acetate (6.4–25.5 nmol/l), propan-2-ol (3.4–39.3 nmol/l), 2-butanone (0–6.6 nmol/l) and tetrachloroethene (0–557 nmol/l). The breath sampler was also used to monitor the elimination of solvents in breath from human volunteers after exposure chamber studies. More than 500 breath samples have been analysed from 24 volunteers in exposures to 10 different solvents (toluene, trimethyl benzene, tetrachloroethene, tetrahydrofuran, acetone, propan-2-ol, xylene, 2-butanone, 1-methoxy-2-propanol and n-hexane). The breath sampler allowed the rapid and non-invasive collection of data on elimination of solvents.

References (7)

  • L. Campbell et al.

    Evaluation of occupational exposure to carbon disulphide by blood, exhaled air and urine analysis

    Am. J. Ind. Med.

    (1985)
  • P.O. Droz et al.

    A direct reading method for chlorinated hydrocarbons in breath

    Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.

    (1988)
  • L. Drummond et al.

    Biological monitoring of workers exposed to benzene in the coke oven industry

    Br. J. Ind. Med

    (1988)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (42)

  • Use of exhaled air as an improved biomonitoring method to assess perchloroethylene short-term exposure

    2017, Environmental Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    In humans, about 2.0% of the PERC volume absorbed is metabolized, the remainder being eliminated unchanged in exhaled air (Prado et al., 2003). Analysis of exhaled air shows almost instantaneous equilibrium between PERC in pulmonary blood and lung air, therefore, this information describes a good indicator of PERC levels in the bloodstream (Dyne et al., 1997). The determination of PERC in exhaled air of workers presents numerous advantages over other methods; the most important is that it is not an invasive method, willingly agreed to subjects and can be used in large population surveys (Dallas et al., 1994).

  • Breath analysis: Technical developments and challenges in the monitoring of human exposure to volatile organic compounds

    2015, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    An alveolar sample was obtained using the dead-space volume expelled before the valve was opened. In 1997, a novel device (Fig. 4) was proposed to capture breath samples for solvent analysis by Dyne et al. [68]. This simple, portable, and robust method was based on a variation of the Haldane-Priestly tube principle.

  • A rapid method for the chromatographic analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of tobacco cigarette and electronic cigarette smokers

    2015, Journal of Chromatography A
    Citation Excerpt :

    The highest limits, e.g. toluene (0.65 ng), were due to background atmospheric levels by use of this compound in nearby labs. Repeatability (residual standard deviation of ten measurements) ranged between 5.9 and 23% which is consistent with previous measurements with Bio-VOCs in other studies [11]. Recoveries of standards introduced into the Bio-VOCs and analyzed as described in the experimental section ranged between 92 and 114% (Table 2).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text