Observation and measurement of the bottom boundary layer flow in the prebreaking zone of shoaling waves
Introduction
Gravity waves propagating from deep to shallow water exhibit continuous transformation in wave profile due to shoaling accompanied by nonlinearity, thus leading to steepening of the wave crest and flattening of the wave trough. Eventually, the profile becomes unstable, leading to breaking waves. Since the hydrodynamic characteristics of shoaling waves are closely related to onshore/offshore sediment transport, vertical distribution of suspended loads, and pollutant dispersion in coastal waters; it is of paramount importance to investigate the flow field of shoaling waves, with special emphasis on the velocity distribution within the bottom boundary layer.
Although numerous investigations for the wave shoaling have been carried out in the past (e.g. Koh and LeM'ehout'e, 1966, Adeyemo, 1970, Iwagaki et al., 1974, Flick et al., 1981, Hedges and Kirkgöz, 1981, Kirkgöz, 1986, Nadaoka, 1986, Hwung and Lin, 1990, Voropayev et al., 2001), the study for the bottom boundary layer structure of shoaling waves propagating on a sloping bottom is still rather limited. Recently, considerable efforts have been devoted to the phenomenon of wave propagating over horizontal bottom. For example, Horikawa and Watanabe (1968) and Sleath (1970) used hydrogen bubbles and tension wire, respectively, to measure velocity distributions near smooth and rough beds. Jonsson and Carlsen (1976), utilizing a micropropeller flow-meter, measured the velocity profiles of turbulent boundary layer flow over rough beds in an oscillating water tunnel. Employing a laser Doppler velocimeter (LDV), Van Doorn (1981), Kemp and Simons (1982), Asano and Iwagaki (1984) and Belorgey et al. (1989) performed non-intrusive measurements of the near-bottom velocities in water waves with or without a current.
Teleki and Anderson (1970) may have been the first research to investigate the near-bottom water-particle velocity on a (smooth) slope with a Preston tube. However, their measurements were only made at the instants of wave-crest and wave-trough by alternatively orienting the L-shaped probe upslope and downslope, which interfered with flow field and thus led to measurement error. Recently, Hwung and Lin, 1989, Hwung and Lin, 1990 and Kirkgöz (1989) utilized LDV to measure the horizontal velocity profiles in the bottom boundary layer of shoaling waves propagating on 1/15 and 1/12 uniform slopes, respectively. Hwung and Lin, 1989, Hwung and Lin, 1990 investigated the vertical distributions of the mean velocity in the pre-breaking zone for different breaking waves. Kirkgöz (1989) examined the vertical distributions of the horizontal velocity under the wave-crest and wave-trough in the transformation zone of plunging breakers. In Kirkgöz (1989), the discrepancy between the measured and predicted velocity distributions was considered to be attributable to the turbulent effect in the near wall region. However, no clear evidence of turbulence was demonstrated, nor was the influence of mass transport on the measured velocity distribution (which might result in such inconsistency) discussed in his investigation.
The aim of this study is to elucidate the flow characteristics within the bottom boundary layer induced by nonlinear, asymmetric shoaling waves, propagating on an 1/15 sloping beach. A flow visualization technique with thin-layered fluorescent dye was first used to observe the flow structure of the bottom boundary layer. Then, a one-component LDV was employed to measure the horizontal (water-particle) velocity in the bottom boundary layer across the pre-breaking zone. Finally, some important features of the bottom boundary layer structure are examined and discussed.
Section snippets
Experimental set-up and method
Experiments were conducted in a glass-walled wave flume located at Tainan Hydraulic Laboratory, National Cheng Kung University. The wave flume is 9.5 m long, 0.3 m wide and 0.7 m deep. The first 3.77 m section had a fixed horizontal smooth bottom starting from the end where a flap-type wave maker was installed. The remaining 5.73 m of the flume had an adjustable sloping smooth bed made of polished stainless plate. A fixed slope of 1/15 was used in this study. Monochromatic waves could be generated
Data analysis
Hussain and Reynolds (1970) proposed a phase average method that, for a steady turbulent shear flow coexisting with a periodic motion, any physical quantity Q could be decomposed into a time mean , a (periodically) oscillating component , and a turbulent fluctuation component Q′. The relation can be expressed asin which and t are position vector and time variable, respectively. The time mean of Q is in the form ofwhere Ts is the
Flow visualization results
It has been widely recognized that the boundary layer developed over natural sea bottom is a turbulent flow. However, it is not clear if turbulence could occur in the case of laboratory wave. It should be examined in the first stage of this investigation.
Figures 3(a, b) show the visualized results of the dye layer flow on the sloping bottom within the pre-breaking zone of case 1 (see Table 1). They were photographed at different times by a camera with different viewing angles when the wave
Concluding remarks
Experimental work was conducted in a wave flume to investigate the characteristics of the bottom boundary layer flow induced by nonlinear, asymmetric shoaling waves, propagating over a smooth bed with an 1/15 uniform slope. A flow visualization technique with thin-layered of fluorescent dye and a laser Doppler velocimeter were both employed. Based on the observation and measurement results depicted above, the following conclusions can be drawn.
- 1.
From the time history of all the horizontal
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the support of the National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China, under Grant No. NSC 89-2611-E-005-005.
References (29)
- et al.
Application of laser Doppler velocimeter to the study of turbulence generated by swell in the vicinity of walls or obstacles
Coastal Eng.
(1989) - et al.
An experimental study of the transformation zone of plunging breaker
Coastal Eng.
(1981) An experimental investigation of plunging breaker boundary layers in the transformation zone
Coastal Eng.
(1989)- et al.
Dynamics of cobbles in the shoaling region of a surf zone
Ocean Eng.
(2001) Velocity fields in the wave breaker zone
Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Coastal Eng., ASCE
(1970)- et al.
Bottom turbulent boundary layer in wave-current co-existing systems
Proc. 19th Int. Conf. Coastal Eng., ASCE
(1984) - et al.
Mass transport in gravity waves on a sloping bottom
Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Coastal Eng., ASCE
(1974) The transition to turbulence in the wake of a circular cylinder
J. Fluid Mech.
(1964)- et al.
Elevation and velocity measurements of laboratory shoaling waves
J. Geophys. Res.
(1981) - et al.
Laboratory study on oscillatory boundary layer flow
Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Coastal Eng., ASCE
(1968)
The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow
J. Fluid Mech.
The characteristics of internal flow field and bottom boundary layer of waves propagating on sloping bottoms
Bulletin No. 16
The mass transport of waves propagating on a sloping bottom
Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. Coastal Eng., ASCE
Relationship between vertical distribution of water particle velocity and type of breakers on beaches
Coastal Eng. Jap.
Cited by (26)
Experimental study of coherent structures and bed shear stress on a smooth bed under a solitary wave
2024, Coastal EngineeringFlow structure and bottom friction of the nonlinear turbulent boundary layer under stormy waves
2021, Coastal EngineeringVelocity characteristics in boundary layer flow caused by solitary wave traveling over horizontal bottom
2016, Experimental Thermal and Fluid ScienceCitation Excerpt :However, it is not seen at all in each of velocity profiles for all of the cases tested in this study. On the contrary, overshooting of the velocity profile was commonly encountered in the boundary layers of both non-shoaling and shoaling progressive waves ([36,19,17] and of shoaling solitary waves during the run-down motion [31,23]. According to Lin et al. [22] and based on Fig. 4(b and c), the maximum free-stream velocity (u∞)max and the corresponding boundary layer thickness δ0 both taking place at T = 0 can be identified as the characteristic velocity and length scales, respectively.
A comparison of velocity profiles in unidirectional currents and the wave boundary layer: Implications for sediment entrainment
2010, Sedimentary GeologyCitation Excerpt :Iterating the water depth and breaker height manually, the breaking depth turned out to be 0.091 m, the breaker height 0.1005 m, and the breaker length 1.6598 m. At a water depth of 0.11 m (position P8 of Lin and Hwung, 2002), the wavelength reduces to 1.713 m (Eq. (19)), the wave boundary layer thickness is 0.0233 m, and a maximum crest boundary velocity of 0.4763 m s− 1 is obtained (Eq. (14)), compared to the experimental result of 0.42 m s− 1. However, the measurements of Lin and Hwung (2002) did not take place at transport threshold values, and in order to test Eq. (13) using U*wc as calculated from Eq. (28), a grain size has to be used that would be at its threshold under the experimental conditions.
Effect of leading waves on velocity distribution of undular bore traveling over sloping bottom
2019, European Journal of Mechanics, B/FluidsCitation Excerpt :To allow high image resolution and appropriate magnification of the measuring area, two Nikon 60 and 105 mm lenses (f/2.8D AF Micro-Nikkor) were fitted to the camera. Based on the linear or nonlinear progressive wave theory, which was well verified by experimental data [e.g., [41,42]], the positive/negative maximum in the horizontal velocity profile occur underlying the crest/trough of a progressive wave with decreasing magnitude down to 0 cm/s at the sloping bottom surface (if the boundary layer effect is not considered). In addition, the velocities in the horizontal velocity profile are equal to 0 cm/s while the free surface of the progressive wave is stepping over the zero-up-crossing and zero-down-crossing levels.