The spacing of lists in free recall*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80046-6Get rights and content

Spaced presentations of 12- and 15-word lists were better recalled when no task or an easy task, rather than a demanding task, intervened between the presentations, contrary to the results of Bjork and Allen (1970). When no task intervened between spaced presentations, recall was better than when presentations were massed (Experiment I). These results are important because (a) they indicate a lack of generality of Bjork and Allen's findings, often considered crucial to general understanding of spacing effects; (b) they indicate a need for (at least) a two-factor theory of the spacing effect; and (c) they are the first evidence for a spacing effect when lists are considered as the unit of repetition.

References (25)

  • BowerG.H.

    Stimulus sampling theory of encoding variability

  • CrowderR.G.

    Principles of learning and memory

    (1976)
  • Cited by (17)

    • When auditory memory is not overwritten

      1979, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
    • Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval

      1976, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
    • Frequency in language: Memory, attention and learning

      2019, Frequency in Language: Memory, Attention and Learning
    • Principles of learning and memory

      2014, Principles of Learning and Memory: Classic Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    The present research was supported by NSF Grant GB 15157 to Robert Crowder and 40208X to Endel Tulving. Gratitude is expressed to Leslie Roediger, Nora Keane, and Joseph Gabbert for the technical assistance, and to David Elmes for his critical comments.

    View full text