Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Volume 5, Issue 3, June 1966, Pages 219-227
Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood
References (15)
- et al.
Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production
J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav.
(1963) Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding
J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav.
(1965)Some effects of grammatical transformations on the recall of English sentences
J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav.
(1963)Syntactic structures
(1957)- et al.
Grammatical relations as determinants of sentence similarity
J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav.
(1965) Negation: a linguistic variable
Acta Psychol.
(1961)Quantitative study of the syntax of speech of Australian children
Lang. Speech
(1959)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (298)
Usage-based approaches to child code-switching: State of the art and ways forward
2022, Cognitive DevelopmentThe roles of the analogy with natural selection in B.F. Skinner's philosophy
2019, Behavioural ProcessesCitation Excerpt :This interpretation of generative grammars was, quite reasonably, taken by psycholinguists to imply that sentences with grammatical derivations involving many formal operations would take longer to comprehend than sentences with derivations involving fewer formal operations. This prediction, however, was tested and fell short of expectations (Slobin, 1966). Almost four decades later, some psycholinguists had become “disenchanted” with this interpretation of generative grammars (Ferreira, 2005).
Lessons from the English auxiliary system
2020, Journal of LinguisticsWh-questions, intervention effects and beyond: An assessment of Brazilian Portuguese-speaking schoolchildren's linguistic abilities
2023, Wh-exclamatives, Imperatives and Wh-questions: Issues on Brazilian Portuguese
Copyright © 1966 Published by Elsevier Inc.