The evolution of territory size—some ESS models
References (29)
Anim. Behav.
(1977)- et al.
Amin. Behav.
(1979) J. theor. Biol.
(1974)J. theor. Biol.
(1974)- et al.
Anim. Behav.
(1979) Z. Tierpsychol.
(1976)Willson Bull.
(1964)- et al.
Science
(1976) Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust.
(1967)
Am. Natur.
Cited by (27)
Territoriality and behavioural strategies at the natal host patch differ in two microsympatric Nasonia species
2018, Animal BehaviourCitation Excerpt :In the dung fly Scatophaga stercoraria, males establish territories at oviposition sites when densities are low but switch to scramble competition at higher densities (Borgia, 1980). Similar effects have been suggested for and found in several other animal species (Alcock & O'Neill, 1986; Mills & Reynolds, 2003; Moore, 1987; Parker & Knowlton, 1980; Warner & Hoffman, 1980). Although the sex ratio in Nv is strongly female biased in the absence of competition, more balanced sex ratios may arise in nature when several females exploit host patches simultaneously (Werren, 1983).
Effect of sex, hunger and relative body size on the use of ripple signals in the interactions among water striders Gerris latiabdominis
2014, Journal of Asia-Pacific EntomologyCitation Excerpt :Therefore, we hypothesized that in a similar manner hunger and sex (or reproductive phase) should affect the use of aggressive ripple signals in other water strider species. This hypothesis is consistent with theoretical expectation that signals carry information about the motivation to defend the resources, which is positively correlated with the current value of resources (Parker, 1974; Parker and Knowlton, 1980; Parker and Rubenstein, 1981; Sigurjónsdóttir and Parker, 1981). We focused on the recently described low frequency signals (Han and Jablonski, 2009b).
Defence, intrusion and the evolutionary stability of territoriality
2010, Journal of Theoretical BiologyCitation Excerpt :Most models of neighbour–neighbour interactions assume that conflicts arise from individuals attempting to increase the size of their territories at their neighbours’ expense and investigate how the position of the border between two (non-overlapping) territories is negotiated by the respective owners (MaynardSmith, 1982; Pereira et al., 2003; Mesterton-Gibbons and Adams, 2003). This process can even lead to the exclusion of some individuals from the territorial population (Parker and Knowlton, 1980). Borders of territories are, however, not impenetrable.
Evolutionary instability in predator-prey systems
1993, Journal of Theoretical BiologyAssessment of expected performance and Zahavi's notion of signal
1993, Animal BehaviourCytoplasmic incompatibility in insects: Why sterilize females?
1991, Trends in Ecology and Evolution
- †
Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, England.