Interface crack between two shear deformable elastic layers
Introduction
Interface cracking is one of common failure modes in multi-layered structures. Typical examples include delamination of composite laminates, debonding of adhesive joints, and decohesion of thin films from substrates. Fracture mechanics principles have been widely employed to assess this type of failure mode, where the energy release rate (G) or stress intensity factor (K) is evaluated and compared with the critical mode-mix-dependent Gc or Kc of the interface determined from experiments. The interface crack is likely to propagate if G or K reaches Gc or Kc. This approach was adopted by Wang and Crossman (1980); Wang (1982); O'Brien 1982, O'Brien 1990; and Davidson et al. (2000). By noting the mode mix dependence of Gc and Kc, it is necessary to extract the mode mix of G and K at the crack tip in order to successfully predict the growth of crack.
Finite elements have been frequently used to calculate G or K and mode mix of the interface crack (Matos et al., 1989; Venkatesha et al., 1996; Beuth, 1996; Sun and Qian, 1997; Qian and Sun, 1998) for general conditions. When the beam/plate-type layered structures are encountered, however, this method is not efficient since the K-dominance zone is very small; therefore, very fine mesh is required to obtain sufficiently accurate results. In such a case, a more efficient alternative is to use a semi-analytical method, where the energy release rate is determined by analytical means in an asymptotic approximation and the mode mix is obtained by solving a 2-D continuum problem. This method is remarkably simple, and therefore, computationally efficient, as proposed and illustrated by Schapery and Davidson (1990) and Suo and Hutchinson (1990). In the original works of Schapery and Davidson (1990); Suo and Hutchinson (1990); Davidson et al. (1995), the energy release rate of an interface crack between two elastic layers was calculated by a classical beam or plate theory; but the mode mix was retrieved through either the finite element method (Schapery and Davidson, 1990; Davidson et al., 1995) or the integral equation method (Suo and Hutchinson, 1990). These methods, commonly known as crack tip element (CTE) analysis (Davidson et al., 1995), were successfully used in the interface fracture analysis (Davidson et al., 2000). However, the shear deformation in the cracked and uncracked regions is not considered in the existing model since the classical beam or plate theory was basically used. As a result, the energy release rate is always underestimated by this method. Comparing with the finite element analysis results, Davidson and Sundararaman (1996) found that the maximum error in the CTE prediction of energy release rate could be as large as 13.7% for an isotropic bi-material glass/epoxy specimen with a slenderness ratio of 8.33. The shear deformation effect on the energy release rate for anisotropic materials with relatively small transverse shear modulus such as polymer composite laminates is even more pronounced as evidenced by Bruno and Greco (2001), where the shear deformation was found to be more than half of the total energy release rate for an orthotropic double cantilever beam specimen. Therefore, it is necessary to account for the shear deformation in computation and prediction of the energy release rate, especially when the materials with relatively low transverse shear modulus and moderate thickness are concerned. A notable effort to incorporate the shear deformation into the energy release rate was made by Bruno and Greco (2001). They modeled the undelaminated region of the laminate as two Reissner–Mindlin plates bonded by a linear elastic interface, instead of only a single plate element as in Schapery and Davidson (1990), and an interface model was introduced to ensure the displacement continuity along the interface of the two plates. The energy release rate was recovered by taking the limit of strain energy per unit interface area at the crack tip, when the interfacial stiffness approaches infinite. Closed form solutions of the energy release rate for certain simple configurations were obtained. The coupling terms in their solutions revealed the obvious shear deformation effect on the energy release rate. However, the energy release rate for general configurations was obtained through a process of taking limits with the aid of numerical calculation, and only a global mode decomposition based on the classical plate theory was introduced in their paper.
The present study is a further effort to enhance the accuracy of the energy release rate and stress intensity factor evaluations of interface cracks between two shear deformable elastic layers, by taking the shear deformation into consideration through modeling the layered systems as Reissner–Mindlin plates. This approach can be traced back to the studies of Armanios (1984); Armanios et al. (1986); Chatterjee et al. (1986); and Chatterjee and Ramnath (1988) for sublaminate analysis. Noting that in Armanios's formulation, the concentrated crack tip forces were neglected, and therefore, extra considerations of continuity or boundary conditions at the crack tip are required.
The aim of this study is to establish a simple closed-form solution for the energy release rate and stress intensity factor that can capture the effect of shear deformation in the cracked and uncracked regions of layered structures. The solution should be essentially the same as the classical solution by Suo and Hutchinson (1990) or Schapery and Davidson (1990) when it is reduced to the simple case in which the shear deformation is neglected. In this sense, this study can be regarded as an extension of the work in the classical plate model to the one in the first-order shear deformation model.
This paper is organized as follows: the analytical work of a bi-layer plate system using the first-order shear deformation theory is first established, followed by the interface fracture analysis of which the explicit solution for the energy release rate and mode decomposition of a crack along the bi-layer interface is obtained. To validate the proposed work, the present solution is compared with the finite element analysis in which the shear deformation is accounted for.
Section snippets
Mechanics of a bi-layer plate
Consider an interface fracture problem of Fig. 1, where a crack lies along the straight interface of the top plate “1” and bottom plate “2” with thickness of h1 and h2, respectively. The two plates are made of homogenous, orthotropic materials, with the orthotropy axes aligned with the coordinate system. The length of the uncracked region L is relatively large compared to the thickness of the whole plate h1+h2. This configuration essentially represents a crack tip element (CTE), a small element
Energy release rate
The J-integral is used to calculate the energy release rate at the crack tip. A closed path surrounding the crack tip shown in Fig. 3 is chosen as the integration path. The J-integral as defined by Rice (1988) is given aswhere Vo is the strain energy density in the structure; ui is the displacement component in i direction; nj is the normal direction of the integral path; σij is the stress component. By substituting Vo, ui and σij in terms of plate internal forces, the J
Numerical example
As a numerical example and verification of the present study, we analyze a single leg bending (SLB) test studied in detail by Davidson and Sundararaman (1996). In their work, the energy release rate and mode mixity of the SLB test were obtained through two approaches: crack tip element (CTE) analysis and finite element (FE) analysis. Three types of specimens with bi-material interfaces were considered: homogeneous, aluminum/niobium, and glass/epoxy, which essentially “span” the range of the
Conclusions
By modeling the uncracked region as two separate shear deformable plates bonded perfectly along their interface, a closed-form solution of the energy release rate is obtained by J-integral method. The resulting solution accounts for the transverse shear deformation of both cracked and uncracked regions by using Reissner–Mindlin plate theory. Mode decomposition is also carried out in the fashion of Suo and Hutchinson (1990). Compared to the approach based on the classical plate theory, the
Acknowledgements
This study was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No.: CMS-0002829 under program director Dr. Ken P. Chong) and the University of Akron.
References (27)
- et al.
Mixed mode delamination in platesa refined approach
Int. J. Solids Struct.
(2001) - et al.
Modeling laminate composite structures as assemblage of sublaminates
Int. J. Solids Struct.
(1988) - et al.
Mixed mode delamination fracture in laminated composites
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(1986) - et al.
A single leg bending test for interfacial fracture toughness determination
Int. J. Fract.
(1996) - et al.
Methods for calculation of stress intensity factors for interfacial cracks between two orthotropic solids
Int. J. Solids Struct.
(1998) - et al.
The use of finite extension strain energy release rates in fracture of interface crack
Int. J. Solids Struct.
(1997) - et al.
Generalized modified crack closure integral and its application to interface crack problems
Comput. Struct.
(1996) - et al.
Brittle fracture of adhesive joints
Int. J. Fract.
(1992) - Armanios, E.A., 1984. New method of sublaminate analysis for composite structures and applications to fracture process....
- et al.
Design analysis and testing for mixed-mode and mode II interlaminar fracture of composites
Separation of crack extension modes in orthotropic delamination models
Int. J. Fract.
An analytical crack-tip element for layered elastic structures
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
Evaluation of energy release rate-based approaches for predicting delamination growth in laminated composites
Int. J. Fract.
Cited by (110)
Gradient theory of thermoelasticity for interface crack problems with a quasicrystal layer
2023, International Journal of Solids and StructuresStress analysis of adhesively-bonded single stepped-lap joints with functionally graded adherends based on the four-parameter fractional viscoelastic model
2023, European Journal of Mechanics, A/SolidsClosed-form solution for interfacially cracked layered beams with bending-extension coupling and hygrothermal stresses
2022, European Journal of Mechanics, A/SolidsFracture mechanics solutions and operative formulae for isotropic bi-material layers with large elastic mismatch
2022, Theoretical and Applied Fracture MechanicsOn elastic clamping boundary conditions in plate models describing detaching bilayers
2022, International Journal of Solids and StructuresNovel bi-layer beam elements for elastic fracture analysis of delaminated composite beams
2022, Engineering Fracture MechanicsCitation Excerpt :It is worth mentioning that the work of Wang and Qiao [8], also so-called the shear deformable bilayer beam theory, was completely analytical, and all the parameters were obtained without resorting to the numerical solutions. This model [8] was extended by Yokozeki [6] and Qiao and Liu [12] to calculate the ERR under mechanical and hygrothermal loads. To better capture the effects of crack tip deformation, Qiao and Wang [13] proposed a new interface deformable bilayer beam theory, in which the interface shear and normal compliances were introduced to account for the interface deformation.