Original articlePatient, parent, and physician perspectives on pediatric oncology rounds*
References (21)
- et al.
Patients' reactions to house staff work rounds
Psychosomatics
(1985) - et al.
Patterns of communication among pediatric patients with leukemia, parents, and physicians: prognostic disagreements and misunderstandings
J Pediatr
(1981) - et al.
Treating the pediatric cancer patient: a review
J Pediatr Psychol
(1977) Words as scalpels: transmitting evidence in the clinical dialogue
Ann Intern Med
(1980)- et al.
Group discussions with the parents of leukemic children
Pediatrics
(1973) - et al.
Therapeutic choices made by patients with end-stage cancer
J Pediatr
(1982) - et al.
Disease-related communication and depression in pediatric cancer patients
J Pediatr Psychol
(1977) - et al.
The child with cancer: patterns of communication and denial
J Consult Clin Psychol
(1978) - et al.
Therapeutic choices by children with cancer
J Pediatr
(1983) Adjustment in children with cancer
J Pediatr Psychol
(1977)
Cited by (53)
Family-centered rounds in hospital settings
2016, Archives de PediatrieA survey of the attitudes and perceptions of multidisciplinary team members towards family presence at bedside rounds in the intensive care unit
2014, Intensive and Critical Care NursingCitation Excerpt :Notwithstanding, a study of hospitalised paediatric patients supports that when given the option to attend, 85% of parents participate in bedside rounds (Muething et al., 2007). Others have noted that participation in bedside rounds affords individuals the opportunity to obtain valuable information (Lewis, 1988) and that communication practices can impact patient outcomes (Wanzer et al., 2004). A quality improvement initiative permitting parents to be present at bedside rounds in a paediatric ICU found that this practice was perceived to be beneficial by physicians, nurses and parents (Kleiberg et al., 2006).
Family-centered rounds in Pakistani pediatric intensive care settings: Non-randomized pre- and post-study design
2013, International Journal of Nursing StudiesCitation Excerpt :The parents’ preference for family-centered rounds and lack of concern regarding confidentiality may be explained by the demographic characteristics of the parents: Most of the parents participating in this study had a secondary education or higher. Higher education has been associated with negative attitudes about bedside rounds (Lewis et al., 1988) and decreased privacy concern (Aronson et al., 2009). Aronson et al. (2009) has determined that family preferences are influenced by day of admission.
Impact of family-centered care on pediatric and neonatal intensive care outcomes
2016, AACN Advanced Critical CareThe Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review
2022, Academic Medicine
- *
Supported in part by a grant from the Academic Senate, University of California, and the Department of Social Work, University of California, San Francisco.