Self-assembly of [Cu(CN)4]3− ions with cationic {Me3Sn}+ or {Me2Sn(CH2)3SnMe2}2+ fragments in the presence of a nBu4N+ template
Introduction
Super-Prussian blue [1] derivatives of the organometallic family [(R3E)3MIII(CN)6][MIIIμ-{CNE(R3)NC}3] with R=alkyl, E=Sn or Pb and M=Fe, Co, Rh or Ir [2] still resemble the familiar Prussian blue representatives [Mμ-(CN)3] (usually with M=0.5 M′+0.5 M′′) [3] structurally, although their intra-chain M⋯M separations are about twice as large (i.e. of ca. one nm) as in classical Prussian blue systems. Replacement of the octahedral M(CN)6 by tetrahedral M(CN)4 building blocks would lead to coordination polymers more closely related to zeolites. While numerous zeolite-like polymeric metal cyanides involving the ‘classical’ MCNM′ bridge, and usually a guest cation, G+, are known, [4], [5] the coordination polymer [(nBu4N)(Et3Sn)2Cu(CN)4] (1), is still unique in displaying the expanded MCNSnR3NCM bridge [6]. In spite of extensive attempts to prepare, and characterize, further examples of the general type [G(R3E)2Cu(CN)4], only too reluctantly crystallizing products either of the desired composition or of a quite unexpected new type, [G(R3E)Cu2(CN)4], have so far been described [6], [7]. Single crystals suitable to determine the crystal structure of the longest known [6] representative of this latter class, [(nBu4N)(Me3Sn)Cu2(CN)4] (2), could be obtained only most recently. In the present contribution, the supramolecular architecture of 2 will be presented and correlated with extended multinuclear solid-state NMR results. The slightly modified, new product [(nBu4N){Me2Sn(CH2)3SnMe2}0.5Cu2(CN)4] (3), which differs from 2 formally in that two methyl groups of each pair of Me3Sn units are replaced by one (CH2)3 spacer, is also characterized both by its solid-state NMR spectra and its powder X-ray diffractogram (XRD). In view of convincing experimental evidence in favor of a practically isostructural architecture of 2 and 3, a plausible proposal for the location of the trimethylene tether in the structure of 3 is likewise possible.
Section snippets
Preparation of 2 and 3
Both [(nBu4N)(Me3Sn)Cu2(CN)4] (2) [6] and [(nBu4N){Me2Sn(CH2)3SnMe2}0.5Cu2(CN)4] (3) were obtained first (as so-called derailment products) when the synthesis of potential zeolite-like homologues of 1 containing tin-bonded alkyl ligands of lower space demand than required by ethyl groups was attempted:
However, according to the C/H/N and metal analyses, which reflected constantly a Sn:Cu ratio
Crystal structure of 2
For the negatively charged [(Me3Sn)Cu2(CN)4−] host framework of 2, three different structural motifs might in principle be envisaged. One of them could involve just one tetracoordinate Cu(I) center which might build up, in combination with the two potential, rod-like tethers {CNCuNC}− and {CNSnMe3NC}−, either a quasi-diamondoid framework (3-D) or puckered layers (2-D) of the composition [Cu{μ-CNCuNC}{μ-CNSn(Me3)NC}]. The second motif could involve no longer unusual [11] {Cu2(μ3-CN)2} fragments,
Powder X-ray diffractometry of 2 and 3
In Fig. 4, the experimental powder X-ray diffractograms (XRD's) of 2 and 3 are compared with the simulated XRD of 2, the latter being based on data resulting from the structure analysis of a single crystal (vide supra). All three XRD's look very similar, suggesting immediately that the finely powdered bulk samples of both 2 and 3 should at least be structurally closely related to crystalline 2. It should be noted here that usually the lighter atoms of a sample containing heavier metal atoms
CPMAS solid-state magnetic resonance spectra of 2 and 3
The chemical shifts of all resonances of the nuclei 13C, 15N and 119Sn are, as far as detectable in the solid-state NMR spectra of 2 and 3, listed for comparison in Table 4. Both 2 and 3 give rise to only one 119Sn center band, in spite of the notable disorder of the tin atoms as reflected by the single-crystal X-ray study of 2. Correspondingly, just one singlet is found for the tin-bonded methyl carbon atoms of 2, most probably owing to rapid rotation of the Me3Sn group about its NSnN axis
Conclusions
Although the quality of the crystal structure analysis of 2 might be somewhat affected by the significant disorder of the tin and carbon atoms of the Me3Sn unit, any severe doubts in the supramolecular architecture based on that stucture analysis can be rejected in accounting also for the detailed solid-state NMR studies of 2 and 3. Owing to almost identical powder X-ray diffractograms (Fig. 4), both compounds are practically isostructural and display, consequently, for the nuclei 13C, 15N and
Experimental
To avoid CO2 uptake, all preparative work was carried out under an atmosphere of dry nitrogen. Compound 2 was synthesized as reported earlier [6]. Micocrystalline 2 containing in a few cases also some single crystals large enough to be used for an X-ray study grew from the mother liquors obtained after the spontaneous precipitation of comparatively little bulk material, filtration and deposition of the solution at a temperature of ca. 20°C for several weeks.
For the preparation of 3, a clear
Supplementary data
Crystallographic data for the structural analysis have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, CCDC No. 150095 for compound 2. Copies of this information may be obtained free of charge from The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EC, UK (Fax: +44-1223-336033; e-mail: [email protected] or www: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
Note added in proof
Most recently, the new compound [nBu4NCu3(CN)4]MeCN has been shown to be almost isostructural with 2, in that each MeSn fragment of 2 is replaced by a two-coordinate Cu(I) spacer [21].
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Joint Project: Nano-porous crystals). The CP MAS NMR work was supported by the UK EPSRC (through the National Solid-State Magnetic Resonance Service based at Durham). We also thank Dr F. Olbrich (Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg) for collecting the X-ray data set and Mrs S. Samba for her involvement in the successful preparation of single crystals of 2.
References (21)
- et al.
J. Organomet. Chem.
(1994) J. Organomet. Chem.
(1998)- et al.
Solid State Ionics
(1997) - et al.
Spectrochim. Acta Part A
(1994) - et al.
J. Organomet. Chem.
(1997) - et al.
Chem. Eur. J.
(1997) - et al.
Organometallics
(1992) - et al.
Progr. Inorg. Chem.
(1997) - (a) R.J. Williams, A.C. Larson, D.T. Cromer, Acta Crystallogr. B28 (1972) 858. (b) M.B. Inoue, L. Machi, M. Inoue, Q....
Cited by (20)
Bimetallic multidimensional supramolecular coordination polymers containing triphenyltin cation and CuCN
2010, Journal of Organometallic ChemistryCitation Excerpt :In the past few years, there has been considerable interest in the design and elaboration of multidimensional Cu(I) coordination polymers prepared by conventional solution routes or by the less conventional solvothermal techniques. The products should be either the [(Cu)n(CN)mxL] complexes [1–7] or the organotin–copper(I) containing polymers [8–12]. The organometallic family [(R3E)3M(CN)6[Mμ-(CNE(R3)NC)3] with R = alkyl and E = Sn or Pb was considered as super-prussian blue derivatives [11] which are related to zeolites.
Sensing and photocatalytic properties of nanosized Cu(I)CN organotin supramolecular coordination polymer based on pyrazine
2019, Applied Organometallic ChemistryDouble Stranded Helical Organo-lead 3D-Supramolecular Coordination Polymer Containing Copper Cyanide and Phenanthroline Ligand as Antimicrobial Agent
2016, Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and MaterialsSelf-assembly and antitumor activity of an organotin coordination polymer containing a helical structure based on copper cyanide and phenanthroline ligand
2015, Journal of Coordination ChemistryStructure and catalytic activity of new metal-organic frameworks based on copper cyanide and quinoline bases
2013, Zeitschrift fur Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie