Chromatographic behaviour of diastereomers : III. Thin-Layer chromatographic behaviour of diastereomeric 4-substituted 6,7-dialkoxy-3-aryl-tetrahydroisoquinolines and -isochromans
References (47)
- et al.
J. Chromatogr.
(1964) - et al.
J. Chromatogr.
(1964) - et al.
J. Chromatogr.
(1965) - et al.
J. Chromatogr.
(1966) - et al.
J. Chromatogr.
(1967) - et al.
J. Chromatogr.
(1970) - et al.
J. Chromatogr.
(1971) J. Chromatogr.
(1972)- et al.
J. Chromatogr.
(1975) - et al.
J. Chromatogr.
(1975)
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
Cited by (15)
Additivity of retention of diastereoisomeric and enantiomeric arylphthalides, aryl(arylene)phthalides and aryldiphthalides of dyadic and triadic composition
2020, Journal of Chromatography ACitation Excerpt :As can be seen from Fig. 3, the meso isomers are characterized by shorter chromatographic retention times and they always elute first, whereas racemic isomers elute second. By analogy with published data on the adsorption for dimeric compounds of other classes [33-43], the difference in the chromatographic behavior of diastereoisomers of diaryldiphthalides can be explained by the difference in the mode of their adsorption, which, in turn, is determined by the configuration and preferred conformation of these compounds. When studying by liquid chromatographic techniques [34-36], TLC [37-41] and GLC [42,43] the effects of steric and stereo-electronic factors on the separation of a wide range of diastereoisomeric pairs of compounds of various classes (amides, esters, acids), it was found that in most cases, racemic diastereomers elute later than the meso‑isomers [37-39].
The rotameric (R*,S*)- and (R*,R*)-biaryl-3,3′-diphthalides of polyphenylene series
2019, TetrahedronCitation Excerpt :This conclusion was made on the basis of HPLC data, according to which the meso-isomers are characterized by smaller retention times and always eluted first, and chiral diphthalides eluted second (Fig. 5). By analogy with literature data on adsorption of diastereoisomers of other classes [28–38], differences in chromatographic behavior of the diastereomeric diphthalides can be explained by a different mechanism of their adsorption, which in its turn is determined by configurational structure and preferred conformation of these compounds. It is considered, that compounds adsorbed on an adsorbent's surface posses the same conformation as in a solution [28–30].
Chromatographic behaviour of diastereoisomers XII. Effects of alumina on separations of esters of maleic and fumaric acids
1994, Journal of Chromatography AChromatographic behavior of diastereoisomers. VIII. Solvent selectivity effects in separations on silica
1986, Journal of Chromatography A