Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 21, Issue 2, January–October 1970, Pages 150-156
Clinical Radiology

Urographic contrast agents. A comparison of sodium and methyglucamine salts

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(70)80106-4Get rights and content

Previous studies of the excretion of urographic contrast agents in sheep demonstrated the dependence of urinary contrast concentration on the dehydration of the animal and the dose and nature of the contrast agent.

This study in humans was arranged to compare the urinary contrast concentration obtained with Sodium and Methylglucamine contrast agents and to define the radiographic significance of any difference. The findings in man which are now presented, confirm the observation in sheep. The sodium contrast agents appear to be more efficient in urography and the difference can be demonstrated by measurement and by radiography.

References (6)

  • SherwoodT. et al.

    Intravenous Urography and Renal Function

    Clinical Radiology

    (1968)
  • BennessG.T. et al.

    Double Dose Urography-Renal Function Test

    Journal of the College of Radiologists of Australasia

    (1965)
  • BennessG.T.

    Urographic Excretion Study-Dehydration and Dose

    Australasian Radiology

    (1967)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (33)

  • LEAD AND HYPERACTIVITY

    1972, The Lancet
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text