Involvement of ERK1/2, cPLA2 and NF-κB in microglia suppression by cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2012.11.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Cannabinoids have been consistently shown to suppress microglia activation and the release of cytotoxic factors including nitric oxide, superoxide and proinflammatory cytokines. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms and whether the action of cannabinoids is coupled to the activation of cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2) receptors are still poorly defined. In this study we observed that the CB1 and CB2 receptor non-selective or selective agonists dramatically attenuate iNOS induction and ROS generation in LPS-activated microglia. These effects are due to their reduction of phosphorylation of extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) and activation of NF-κB. Surprisingly, instead of reversing the effect of the respective CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists, the antagonists also suppress iNOS induction and ROS generation in activated microglia by similar mechanisms. Taken together, these results indicate that both cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists might suppress microglia activation by CB1 and CB2 receptor independent mechanisms, and provide a new insight into the mechanisms of microglia inhibition by cannabinoids.

Highlights

► CB1/CB2 receptor non-selective and selective agonists blocked iNOS induction and ROS generation in LPS-activated microglia. ► The inhibitory effects are mediated by reducing ERK1/2 and cPLA2 phosphorylation and NFκB activation. ► Microglia suppression by CB1/CB2 receptor agonists was not reversed by the respective antagonists. ► The CB1/CB2 antagonists also blocked NO and ROS production in activated microglia. ► CB1/CB2 agonists and antagonists are likely to suppress microglia activation by CB1/CB2 receptor independent mechanisms.

Introduction

Microglia, the resident immune cells in the central nervous system (CNS), are thought to carry out homeostatic surveillance, screening for changes in the microenvironment [1], [2]. Upon activation, microglia undergo a dramatic transition from a resting, ramified morphology to a phagocytosis-capable, “macrophage-like” phenotype [3], [4]. Although the initial response of microglia to injury is to promote repair by removing debris and dying cells, excessive activation of microglia appears to be toxic to neighboring cells due to their release of inflammatory cytokines [5], [6], glutamate [7], [8], nitric oxide and peroxynitrite [9]. Accumulating evidence indicates that cannabinoids can modulate the function of activated microglia and the release of cytotoxic factors [10].

It has been shown that both cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2) are expressed in microglia and astrocytes [11]. Unlike the CB1 receptor, which is constitutively expressed in microglia, the expression of CB2 receptor is inducible and modulated in response to the activation stage of microglia [10], [11]. Increased expression of CB1 and CB2 receptors has been demonstrated in many inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases, including multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain and spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease and Alzheimer's disease [12], [13], [14], [15], [16].

Although there is a consensus that activation of these receptors can suppress the release of cytotoxic factors from activated microglia and astrocytes, it is still controversial whether and how these receptors mediate the anti-inflammatory action of cannabinoids. It has been reported that the inhibitory effect of WIN55212-2, a non-selective cannabinoid agonist, on TNF-α production from LPS-activated microglia is not altered by CB1 or CB2 receptor antagonists [17], [18]. However, other studies suggested that the release of TNFα and other proinflammatory cytokines, such as IFN-γ, IL-12 and IL-23, is attenuated by signaling pathways coupled to the cannabinoid receptor activation [19], [20]. Similarly, WIN55212-2 and other non-selective cannabinoid receptor agonists are also shown to attenuate iNOS induction in activated microglia and glutamate excitotoxicity by cannabinoid receptor dependent and independent mechanisms [21], [22], [23]. Although CB2 selective agonists have been shown to be beneficial in several animal models of neurodegenerative diseases, as well as neuropathic and inflammatory pain by inhibiting microglia activation [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], the selective CB1 agonists and cannabidiol (CBD), a non-CB1/CB2 receptor interactive cannabinoid, are also shown to have anti-inflammatory effects by targeting CB1 receptor and the non-CB1/CB2 receptors expressed in microglial cells, respectively [31], [32], [33], [34].

We and others have previously shown that peroxynitrite, the reaction product of nitric oxide and superoxide, is the primary toxic species released from activated microglia causing toxicity to neurons and oligodendrocytes [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]. It has been suggested that activation of cPLA2 occurs upstream of iNOS induction in macrophages and astrocytes [40], [41], and phosphorylation of mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) is required for the activation of cPLA2 [42], [43]. In this study, we examined whether the inhibitory effects of cannabinoids are due to their interference with the signaling pathways leading to iNOS induction. Using the microglia cell line BV-2 cells and primary cultures of microglia, we found that the CB1 and CB2 receptor non-selective and selective agonists attenuated iNOS induction and ROS generation in LPS-activated microglia. Surprisingly, the inhibitory effects of these cannabinoids are not reversed by the cannabinoid receptor antagonists, and, in fact, these antagonists themselves can also attenuate nitric oxide and superoxide production in activated microglia. Furthermore, the inhibitory action of both cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists is mediated by a similar signaling pathway, which includes inhibition of ERK1/2 and cPLA2 phosphorylation and suppression of NF-κB activation.

Section snippets

Materials

Fetal bovine serum (FBS) and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). BV-2 cell line was a generous gift from Dr. Feng-Qiao Li, Cognosci. Inc., NC. Bacterial LPS (Escherichia coli O111:B4) and 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). 2′,7′-Dichlorohydrofluorescein diacetate (DCF) was purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR). Antibodies against the phosphorylated and the total extracellular signal

ERK1/2 and JNK phosphorylation leads to cPLA2 activation and iNOS induction in LPS-activated BV-2 cells

Activation of cPLA2 has been reported to occur downstream MAPK phosphorylation [43] and upstream iNOS induction in macrophages and astrocytes [40], [41]. However, it is unclear whether the same signaling pathway is required in activated microglia. To test this possibility, we examined cPLA2 phosphorylation and iNOS induction in murine microglia cell line BV-2 cells following LPS treatment. LPS (1 μg/ml)-induced phosphorylation of cPLA2 was dramatically increased at 30 min and then gradually

Discussion

Cannabinoid receptor antagonists are commonly used to determine the CB1 and CB2 receptor dependent mechanisms of cannabinoids in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Although numerous studies have demonstrated that CB2 receptor is highly expressed in activated microglia in many inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases and likely mediates the anti-inflammatory properties of cannabinoids, the in vitro studies using microglia cell lines and primary cultures of microglia continue to produce

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (RG3741), the Defense Medical Research and Development Program (0130-10-00003-00002) and the Uniformed Services University (R070UX and R0701Z).

References (58)

  • E. Kozela et al.

    Cannabinoids delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol differentially inhibit the lipopolysaccharide-activated NF-kappaB and interferon-beta/STAT proinflammatory pathways in BV-2 microglial cells

    J Biol Chem

    (2010)
  • Y. Nakajima et al.

    Endocannabinoid: anandamide in gingival tissue regulates the periodontal inflammation through NF-kappaB pathway inhibition

    FEBS Lett

    (2006)
  • A. Franklin et al.

    Arachidonylcyclopropylamide increases microglial cell migration through cannabinoid CB2 and abnormal-cannabidiol-sensitive receptors

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (2003)
  • S. Kreutz et al.

    Cannabinoids and neuronal damage: differential effects of THC, AEA and 2-AG on activated microglial cells and degenerating neurons in excitotoxically lesioned rat organotypic hippocampal slice cultures

    Exp Neurol

    (2007)
  • C.J. Fowler et al.

    Modulation of the endocannabinoid system: neuroprotection or neurotoxicity?

    Exp Neurol

    (2010)
  • L. Fetler et al.

    Brain under surveillance: the microglia patrol

    Science

    (2005)
  • P.G. Popovich et al.

    Cellular inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in Sprague-Dawley and Lewis rats

    J Comp Neurol

    (1997)
  • T. Watanabe et al.

    Differential activation of microglia after experimental spinal cord injury

    J Neurotrauma

    (1999)
  • D. Giulian et al.

    Interleukin 1 of the central nervous system is produced by ameboid microglia

    J Exp Med

    (1986)
  • D. Bartholdi et al.

    Expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine mRNA upon experimental spinal cord injury in mouse: an in situ hybridization study

    Eur J Neurosci

    (1997)
  • P.J. Kingham et al.

    Apoptotic pathways mobilized in microglia and neurones as a consequence of chromogranin A-induced microglial activation

    J Neurochem

    (1999)
  • S.W. Barger et al.

    Activation of microglia by secreted amyloid precursor protein evokes release of glutamate by cystine exchange and attenuates synaptic function

    J Neurochem

    (2001)
  • D.J. Stuehr et al.

    Mammalian nitrate biosynthesis: mouse macrophages produce nitrite and nitrate in response to Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1985)
  • N. Stella

    Cannabinoid and cannabinoid-like receptors in microglia: astrocytes, and astrocytomas

    Glia

    (2010)
  • P. Pacher et al.

    The endocannabinoid system as an emerging target of pharmacotherapy

    Pharmacol Rev

    (2006)
  • R. Mechoulam et al.

    Endocannabinoids and traumatic brain injury

    Mol Neurobiol

    (2007)
  • G.A. Cabral et al.

    Emerging role of the cannabinoid receptor CB2 in immune regulation: therapeutic prospects for neuroinflammation

    Expert Rev Mol Med

    (2009)
  • T. Bisogno et al.

    Cannabinoid receptors and endocannabinoids: role in neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders

    CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets

    (2010)
  • S. Adhikary et al.

    Modulation of inflammatory responses by a cannabinoid-2-selective agonist after spinal cord injury

    J Neurotrauma

    (2011)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Synthetic cannabinoids reduce the inflammatory activity of microglia and subsequently improve neuronal survival in vitro

      2022, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is possible that the high concentrations of ACEA (1.2 µM), HU-308 (2.5 µM), or CP 55,940 (1.8 µM) also engaged these other receptors, in either an orthosteric or allosteric manner, which contributed to the anti-inflammatory effects in a manner that was not completely abrogated by CB1 or CB2 receptor-selective antagonists. Alternatively, CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists alone have previously demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties in microglia which could potentially explain how the effects of HU-308 or CP 55,940 were not blocked by AM630 (Ribeiro et al., 2013). Interestingly, the CB2 receptor inverse agonist, SR144528, effectively inhibited the protective effects of HU-308 and CP 55,940 where AM630 did not.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text