Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 98, April 2017, Pages 13-23
Neuropsychologia

The pace of vocabulary growth during preschool predicts cortical structure at school age

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Children differ greatly in the pace at which they acquire their vocabulary.

  • Pace of vocabulary growth longitudinally estimated in children 14–58 months old.

  • Vocabulary growth predicted cortical thickness in the left supramarginal gyrus.

  • Supramarginal gyrus connected to the frontal lobe via a dorsal fiber tract.

Abstract

Children vary greatly in their vocabulary development during preschool years. Importantly, the pace of this early vocabulary growth predicts vocabulary size at school entrance. Despite its importance for later academic success, not much is known about the relation between individual differences in early vocabulary development and later brain structure and function. Here we examined the association between vocabulary growth in children, as estimated from longitudinal measurements from 14 to 58 months, and individual differences in brain structure measured in 3rd and 4th grade (8–10 years old). Our results show that the pace of vocabulary growth uniquely predicts cortical thickness in the left supramarginal gyrus. Probabilistic tractography revealed that this region is directly connected to the inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis) and the ventral premotor cortex, via what is most probably the superior longitudinal fasciculus III. Our findings demonstrate, for the first time, the relation between the pace of vocabulary learning in children and a specific change in the structure of the cerebral cortex, specifically, cortical thickness in the left supramarginal gyrus. They also highlight the fact that differences in the pace of vocabulary growth are associated with the dorsal language stream, which is thought to support speech perception and articulation.

Introduction

Babies are born without speech; the word infant comes from Latin infant- ‘unable to speak’.2 Nevertheless, they acquire language with remarkable speed and sophistication, starting with phoneme discrimination and babbling during the first months, and continuing to produce their first words by the end of the first year (Kuhl, 2004). Unlike a second language learner who typically receives explicit instruction, babies acquire their vocabulary implicitly, using statistical learning (computing the probability of a syllable being preceded or followed by another syllable) to extract words from continuous speech (Saffran et al., 1996). The acquisition of a word form, in turn, facilitates mapping it to meaning (Estes et al., 2007).

Although most children learn words according to a common trajectory, rate and timing of vocabulary development show striking variability across children (Fenson et al., 1994). Variation in vocabulary development during the first years of life is important because it is associated with later academic success. The size of oral vocabulary at 24 months of age predicts academic achievement (reading and math), as well as behavioral functioning (self-regulation and social behavior), at kindergarten, even after controlling for covariates such as socioeconomic status (SES), gender, birth weight, parenting quality, and maternal health (Morgan et al., 2015). Moreover, the rate of vocabulary growth at 30 months of age can uniquely predict vocabulary skill before entering kindergarten (Rowe et al., 2012).

Despite the ample evidence demonstrating that variations in vocabulary early in development predict subsequent skills, little is known about the biological underpinnings of these effects. In the current study, for the first time, we examined the relation between individual differences in early vocabulary growth at preschool and structural differences in the brain at school age. More specifically, we examined the association between early vocabulary growth from 14 months to 58 months of age and individual variation in gray and white matter in brain regions previously implicated in vocabulary processing at school age (3rd and 4th grade) in 20 typically developing children.

Studying the underlying brain mechanisms of first language vocabulary acquisition can be methodologically challenging because of the nature of the subject population (excessive motion, anxiety, lack of sustained attention, to name but a few) (Dehaene-Lambertz and Spelke, 2015). Nonetheless, there is an increasing number of studies investigating speech processing in infant brain using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional near-infrared spectroscopy, magnetoencephalography, and electroencephalography (Benavides-Varela et al., 2012, Dehaene-Lambertz et al., 2006, Dehaene-Lambertz et al., 2010, Junge et al., 2012, Mahmoudzadeh et al., 2013, Travis et al., 2011). These studies reveal a continuity between the patterns of brain activation to speech in infants and those observed in adults. Dehaene-Lambertz and Spelke (2015) thus suggest that developmental changes in behavior may be mediated by maturational changes in cortical regions and their connections. The maturation of frontal, temporal, and parietal cortical areas, and their white matter connectivity, provide children with increasingly efficient networks for language (Dubois et al., 2016, Leroy et al., 2011, Pujol et al., 2006). But in addition to maturational processes, the child's interaction with her environment has been found to contribute significantly to individual differences in language development (Hackman and Farah, 2009, Johnson, 2001).

Although there is a paucity of neuroimaging studies of young children during the preschool years, a time when vocabulary shows the largest growth (Kuhl, 2010, Nazzi and Bertoncini, 2003), several studies have been done on vocabulary learning in older children (Richardson and Price, 2009). These studies have shown that gray matter density in the posterior supramarginal gyrus (SMG) is positively associated with vocabulary knowledge in young teenagers (Lee et al., 2007, Richardson et al., 2010), as are the pοsterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) and posterior temporo-parietal junction across the lifespan (ages 7–73). Sowell et al. (2004) found that cortical thinning in the left lateral dorsal frontal and the left lateral parietal regions correlates with improvement in vocabulary competence in children between ages 5 and 10 (Sowell et al., 2004).

Second language learning studies in adults also offer some insights into the neural underpinnings of word acquisition. Rodríguez-Fornells et al. (2009) proposed three “interfaces” in the brain that are crucial for second language learning: (1) an interface between auditory and motor processes that enables speech perception and articulation (auditory-motor interface), thought to be mediated by the dorsal language stream; (2) an interface between meaning representations and response selection (meaning integration interface) that enables mapping speech to meaning, mediated by the ventral language stream; and (3) a memory interface enabling consolidation of newly learned words into new lexical representations linked to meaning (memory interface), mediated by the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe (Davis and Gaskell, 2009).

Adult vocabulary learning studies frequently use tasks that tap into a specific interface, be it the meaning integration interface (i.e. the ability to map novel sounds/words to meaning), or the auditory-motor interface (i.e. the ability to map novel sounds/words to articulation). In a study testing the meaning-integration interface (Wong et al., 2011) trained individuals to match non-native spoken words to pictures of items. They found that white matter fractional anisotropy (FA) in a left parieto-temporal cluster in the extreme capsule fiber system (a ventral language pathway) is associated with learning performance. They suggested that this result was consistent with the word-to-meaning mapping required in their task (Wong et al., 2011). Another set of studies focusing on the auditory-motor interface used continuous speech learning paradigms with non-native (Veroude et al., 2010) or artificial languages (Lopez-Barroso et al., 2013, Lopez-Barroso et al., 2015). Veroude et al. (2010) exposed adult learners to a short video clip in Chinese and later asked them to recognize the phonological form of words they had heard in the clip. They found that successful learners showed increased connectivity between the left and right SMG after exposure to the new language. López-Barroso et al. (2015) measured resting-state connectivity before and after word learning training from continuous speech in an artificial language. They found increased connectivity in dorsal fronto-parietal, dorsal auditory-premotor, and ventral fronto-temporal networks after training, and a correlation between learning performance and connectivity in a dorsal auditory-premotor network (Lopez-Barroso et al., 2015) The ability to learn words from continuous speech was also related to white matter radial diffusivity (RD) along the left arcuate fasciculus, connecting posterior temporal and inferior frontal area (Lopez-Barroso et al., 2013). These results stress the importance of the dorsal pathway for learning words from exposure to non-native continuous speech. However, this literature is based on adolescent and adult learners who have already acquired a native language. The focus of our study is to determine which of the three interfaces outlined above––auditory-motor interface, meaning integration interface, memory interface––is more closely related to first language vocabulary acquisition.

The measure of vocabulary competence that we used in our study was based on observations of children's spontaneous interactions with their caregivers. We tallied the number of different word types children uttered at each observation session (taken every 4 months between 14 and 58 months of age). Our measure was thus an expressive rather than receptive vocabulary measure. As a consequence, we would expect contributions from all three interfaces, with an emphasis on the auditory-motor interface. Rather than focus on children's vocabulary at a single point in time, we modeled the growth of children's vocabulary between 14 and 58 months to get a picture of the trajectory of vocabulary development.

Since the main resource available to word-learners is the speech they are immersed in, the variation in children's vocabulary development can be traced back to variations in environmental factors, in particular, to family SES (Hoff, 2006) and to the quantity (Huttenlocher et al., 1991) and quality (Cartmill et al., 2013) of parental linguistic input (Hoff, 2003, Hoff and Naigles, 2002, Montag et al., 2015, Rowe, 2012, Weisleder and Fernald, 2013). Thus, in examining relations between vocabulary development and brain, we included parental SES and input as covariates.

We examined relations between vocabulary development and two brain structure measures: cortical thickness, and white matter connectivity. Cortical thickness measures were extracted from the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG; pars opercularis and pars triangularis), the middle frontal gyrus (MFG), the posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG), the posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG), the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), and the SMG. The areas were selected based on the literature on vocabulary processing, which implicates these regions for processing single words (Davis and Gaskell, 2009, Li et al., 2014, Price, 2010, Rodríguez-Fornells et al., 2009). We focused on cortical thickness because it is a measurable manifestation of important underlying cellular changes: cortical thickness is tied to the number of neurons in a cortical column, the amount of glial and capillary support, and dendritic branching (Rakic, 2009, Rakic, 1988), all of which are amenable to change as a result of postnatal experience and learning (Anderson et al., 1994, Black et al., 1990, Kleim et al., 1996). To explore the connectivity between cortical areas involved in word learning, we used probabilistic tractography to map white matter connectivity, our second brain structure measure.

Based on existing data on teenagers learning words in their first language, adults learning words in a second language, as well as computer simulations (Ueno et al., 2011), we hypothesized that variations in the rate of early vocabulary acquisition would be primarily associated with variations in gray and white matter structure in brain regions along the dorsal language pathway. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relation between the developmental trajectory of vocabulary acquisition in preschool years and subsequent brain structure in later years.

Section snippets

Participants

Twenty children (age 8–10 years, M=9.21 years, SD=.63 years; right-handed; 10 female), all of whom were native speakers of American English, participated in the study, which is part of a larger longitudinal study on language development (Goldin-Meadow et al., 2014). Each parent gave written informed consent following the guidelines of the Institutional Review Boards for the Division of Biological Sciences at The University of Chicago, and the Office of Research at the University of California,

Results

In this section, we first present the data on individual growth modeling using HLM. We describe vocabulary growth between 14 and 58 months, integrating parent SES and parent word types as predictors of growth. Second, we use empirical Bayes estimated growth rates from vocabulary growth models to predict gray and white matter structure measures using multiple regression analyses.

Discussion

We investigated the association between individual variation in vocabulary development during preschool years and cortical thickness and white matter connectivity during later school years in a sample of typically developing children. A large body of literature highlights the importance of examining the trajectory of vocabulary development prior to school entry. The size of a child's vocabulary in preschool years has been found to predict the child's vocabulary at school entry (Rowe and

Conclusions

Cortical thickness in the left SMG is significantly associated with linear growth in vocabulary size, even after controlling for age, gender, SES and parental input. Children with steeper vocabulary growth at 14–58 months of age have thinner left SMG cortex at 7–9 years of age. Although previous studies have shown an association between the structure of the SMG and word learning in adults, this is the first study to demonstrate that the area is influenced by vocabulary acquisition early in

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a program project grant P01HD40605 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (S. Goldin-Meadow, PI; S. Small, Imaging Project PI). We thank the participating families for sharing their child's language development with us; Christine Bascetta, Karyn Brasky, Megan Broughan, Laura Chang, Elaine Croft, Kristin Duboc, Sam Engel, Jennifer Griffin, Sarah Gripshover, Kelsey Harden, Lauren King, Max Masich, Carrie Meanwell, Erica Mellum, Molly

References (97)

  • C. Destrieux et al.

    Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature

    Neuroimage

    (2010)
  • B. Fischl et al.

    Cortical surface-based analysis

    Neuroimage

    (1999)
  • A.D. Friederici

    Pathways to language: fiber tracts in the human brain

    Trends Cognit. Sci.

    (2009)
  • D.A. Hackman et al.

    Socioeconomic status and the developing brain

    Trends Cognit. Sci.

    (2009)
  • E. Hoff

    How social contexts support and shape language development☆

    Dev. Rev.

    (2006)
  • J. Huttenlocher et al.

    Sources of variability in children's language growth

    Cognit. Psychol.

    (2010)
  • P.K. Kuhl

    Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition

    Neuron

    (2010)
  • C. Lebel et al.

    Microstructural maturation of the human brain from childhood to adulthood

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • P. Li et al.

    Neuroplasticity as a function of second language learning: anatomical changes in the human brain

    Cortex

    (2014)
  • D. Lopez-Barroso et al.

    Multiple brain networks underpinning word learning from fluent speech revealed by independent component analysis

    Neuroimage

    (2015)
  • C. Rogalsky et al.

    Speech repetition as a window on the neurobiology of auditory–motor integration for speech: A voxel-based lesion symptom mapping study

    Neuropsychologia

    (2015)
  • S.M. Smith et al.

    Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data

    NeuroImage

    (2006)
  • T. Ueno et al.

    Lichtheim 2: synthesizing aphasia and the neural basis of language in a neurocomputational model of the dual dorsal-ventral language pathways

    Neuron

    (2011)
  • K. Veroude et al.

    Functional connectivity between brain regions involved in learning words of a new language

    Brain Lang.

    (2010)
  • A.M. Winkler et al.

    Permutation inference for the general linear model

    Neuroimage

    (2014)
  • A. Yendiki et al.

    Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study

    Neuroimage

    (2014)
  • E.H. Yeterian et al.

    The cortical connectivity of the prefrontal cortex in the monkey brain

    Cortex

    (2012)
  • F. Agosta et al.

    Language networks in semantic dementia

    Brain

    (2010)
  • B.J. Anderson et al.

    Glial hypertrophy is associated with synaptogenesis following motor-skill learning, but not with angiogenesis following exercise

    Glia

    (1994)
  • A. Baddeley

    Working memory: looking back and looking forward

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • A. Baddeley et al.

    The phonological loop as a language learning device

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1998)
  • E. Bates

    The Emergence of Symbols

    (1979)
  • S. Benavides-Varela et al.

    Newborn's brain activity signals the origin of word memories

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2012)
  • J.E. Black et al.

    Learning causes synaptogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1990)
  • S. Budisavljevic et al.

    Age-related differences and heritability of the Perisylvian language networks

    J. Neurosci.

    (2015)
  • E.A. Cartmill et al.

    Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2013)
  • M. Catani et al.

    Perisylvian language networks of the human brain

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2005)
  • M.H. Davis et al.

    A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.

    (2009)
  • A.S. Dick et al.

    The language connectome: new pathways, new concepts

    Neuroscientist

    (2014)
  • J. Dubois et al.

    Exploring the early organization and maturation of linguistic pathways in the human infant brain

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2016)
  • K.G. Estes et al.

    Can infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and word learning

    Psychol. Sci.

    (2007)
  • L. Fenson et al.

    Variability in early communicative development

    Monogr. Soc. Res. Child. Dev.

    (1994)
  • B. Fischl et al.

    Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2000)
  • B. Fischl et al.

    Automatically parcellating the human

    Cereb. Cortex.

    (2004)
  • S. Frey et al.

    Dissociating the human language pathways with high angular resolution diffusion fiber tractography

    J. Neurosci.

    (2008)
  • S. Goldin-Meadow et al.

    New evidence about language and cognitive development based on a longitudinal study: hypotheses for intervention

    Am. Psychol.

    (2014)
  • B. Hart et al.

    American parenting of language-learning children: persisting differences in family-child interactions observed in natural home environments

    Dev. Psychol.

    (1992)
  • E. Hoff

    The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech

    Child. Dev.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Effects of socioeconomic status in predicting reading outcomes for children: The mediation of spoken language network

      2021, Brain and Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      To further explore the cognitive mechanisms underlying the RSFC of L.aSTG-L.pSTG found in the mediation model, we did supplementary analyses with the behavioral data from our longitudinal study. As previous research has shown that vocabulary growth rate is tightly associated with reading and reading-related brain structures (Asaridou, Ouml, Demir-Lira, Goldin-Meadow, & Small, 2017; Rowe, Raudenbush, & Goldin-Meadow, 2012; Song et al., 2015; Su et al., 2018), we performed analyses of correlation between the RSFC of L.aSTG-L.pSTG and the growth rate of vocabulary development. In the present study, children’s vocabulary data were collected between age 4 and age 10 each year.

    • Influences of the early family environment and long-term vocabulary development on the structure of white matter pathways: A longitudinal investigation

      2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Longitudinal studies have shown that the development of these white matter tracts is a long-lasting process from early childhood to adolescence (Barnea-Goraly et al., 2005; Eluvathingal et al., 2007; Lebel et al., 2008). During this long-term process, the brain is inevitably influenced by the external family environment and internal learning experience of the children (Asaridou et al., 2017; Farah, 2017; Yeatman et al., 2012). However, there is a paucity of evidence on how the family environment and individual learning experience interact in the development of white matter pathways.

    • Measuring success: Within and cross-domain predictors of academic and social trajectories in elementary school

      2019, Early Childhood Research Quarterly
      Citation Excerpt :

      When language was included in a comprehensive set of indicators, it emerged as a strong and consistent predictor of outcomes. It is already widely accepted that oral language ability is important as an independent predictor of achievement (Asaridou, Demir-Lira, Goldin-Meadow, & Small, 2016; Bleses, Makransky, Dale, Hojen, & Ari, 2016 ; Shanahan & Lonigan, 2010; Morgan, Farkas, Hillemeier, Hammer, & Maczuga, 2015; NICHD ECCRN, 2005); much of this research has identified grammar to be more predictive than other measures such as vocabulary (Shanahan & Lonigan, 2010). Additional evidence is needed, however, to understand how language ability – consisting of lexical, morphological, and syntactic skills – interacts with other domains to predict academic and social outcomes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text