Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 129, 1 April 2016, Pages 414-427
NeuroImage

Full Length Articles
In vivo observation and biophysical interpretation of time-dependent diffusion in human white matter

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We measure time-dependent DTI (55 ms – 600 ms) in vivo in human white matter.

  • Pronounced longitudinal and weaker transverse time-dependent diffusion is observed.

  • Longitudinal time-dependence is attributed to axonal varicosities.

  • Transverse time-dependence is attributed to the random axon packing geometry.

  • Varying diffusion time may provide a novel microstructural contrast.

Abstract

The presence of micrometer-level restrictions leads to a decrease of diffusion coefficient with diffusion time. Here we investigate this effect in human white matter in vivo. We focus on a broad range of diffusion times, up to 600 ms, covering diffusion length scales up to about 30 μm. We perform stimulated echo diffusion tensor imaging on 5 healthy volunteers and observe a relatively weak time-dependence in diffusion transverse to major fiber tracts. Remarkably, we also find notable time-dependence in the longitudinal direction. Comparing models of diffusion in ordered, confined and disordered media, we argue that the time-dependence in both directions can arise due to structural disorder, such as axonal beads in the longitudinal direction, and the random packing geometry of fibers within a bundle in the transverse direction. These time-dependent effects extend beyond a simple picture of Gaussian compartments, and may lead to novel markers that are specific to neuronal fiber geometry at the micrometer scale.

Introduction

The unique advantage of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) arises from the sensitivity of water diffusion to the micrometer-level structure of its surrounding environment. In biological tissues, restrictions such as cell walls provide the basis for contrast in dMRI, and particularly, in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (Basser, 1995, Beaulieu, 2002). This contrast holds the promise of probing neuronal tissue structure at the scales of about three orders of magnitude below the nominal clinical MRI resolution. From the physics standpoint, this involves quantifying the relevant length scales, such as the compartment (cell) size, or the cell packing correlation length.

There are two physically distinct ways of being sensitive to the cellular length scale: by varying the diffusion wave vector q, or by varying the diffusion time t, as illustrated in Fig. 1 of (Burcaw et al., 2015). The q-method, based on Callaghan's “diffusion diffraction” effect (Callaghan et al., 1991), measures the diffusion signal (the propagator) in the narrow pulse limit as function of q, and the length scale (the fully restricted pore size) is given by the inverse of the characteristic q value for which the propagator experiences oscillations. Unfortunately, given ~ 1 μm-diameter axons and dendrites, the required q values are prohibitively large for in vivo human measurements.

Instead, here our aim is to derive the relevant length scale(s) in human white matter (WM) by varying t, and studying the time-dependence D(t) of the diffusion coefficient (more generally, of the diffusion tensor eigenvalues). This formally amounts to a q  0 measurement as the diffusion coefficient is proportional to a derivative of the dMRI signal at q = 0, which thereby makes our approach clinically feasible. Since the diffusion coefficient in a given direction x̂ is a measure of the mean squared displacement, i.e. D(t) = 〈(x(t)  x(0))2〉/2t, the length scale probed by water molecules may be adjusted by varying t. With increasing t, water molecules encounter more hindrances and restrictions to their diffusion paths, such as cellular walls and myelin, and therefore the resultant measured diffusion coefficient will decrease (Mitra et al., 1992, Novikov et al., 2014).

While time-dependence of the diffusion coefficient in mammalian WM has been clearly demonstrated at short times (~ 1 ms) (discussed in more detail below), in vivo evidence for the time-dependence using pulse gradient spin echo (PGSE) methods over clinically feasible diffusion time ranges (t > 20 ms) has been inconsistent. In vivo studies of brain, such as healthy and ischemic feline brain tissue (van Gelderen et al., 1994) yielded no change in the mean diffusivity with respect to t for a wide range encompassing 20–2000 ms. Nor was time-dependence observed in vivo in the mean diffusivity of human genu at relatively short times (t = 8 – 80 ms) (Clark et al., 2001) or in the longitudinal or transverse diffusivity within the human corticospinal tract for even longer times (t = 64 – 256 ms) (Nilsson et al., 2009). On the other hand, time-dependent diffusion has been observed in vivo in the corpus callosum, corona radiata, and brainstem of human subjects at times ranging from 40 to 800 ms (Horsfield et al., 1994). Furthermore, ex vivo studies in frog sciatic nerve with diffusion times of 2 ms and 28 ms (Beaulieu and Allen, 1996), bovine optic nerve with diffusion times ranging from 8 to 30 ms (Stanisz et al., 1997), optic and sciatic nerves with diffusion times from 3.7 ms to 99.3 ms (Bar-Shir and Cohen, 2008), as well as bovine optic nerve and rat spinal cord and brain with diffusion times from 40 to 250 ms (Assaf and Cohen, 2000) have shown a clear dependence of D(t) on time in longitudinal and/or transverse direction. More recently, Kunz et al. (2013) imaged the rat corpus callosum in vivo at t ranging from 9 to 24 ms and found time-dependent diffusion in both longitudinal and transverse directions.

Oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) diffusion-weighted sequences are able to probe shorter diffusion times compared to conventional PGSE, and have demonstrated time-dependent diffusion in the brain. An in vivo oscillating gradient study of the rat cortex (Does et al., 2003) at frequencies up to 500 Hz, which correspond to very short t  1 ms, shows a clear time-dependence in the mean diffusivity in both normal live and post-mortem globally ischemic rat cortex. Later work using OGSE with corresponding effective diffusion times (1 – 5 ms) also demonstrated time-dependence in ex vivo rat WM tracts (Xu et al., 2014). In humans, Baron et al. (Baron and Beaulieu, 2014) combined OGSE (25 and 50 Hz) and PGSE methods (t = 20 and 40 ms) for a total diffusion time range of 4 to 40 ms, and found eight major WM tracts and two deep gray matter areas to exhibit time-dependent diffusion. Van et al. (2014) have seen a similar effect with OGSE in human corpus callosum in the frequency range 18–63 Hz. Furthermore, recent work using double PFG MR indirectly points at the possibly non-Gaussian (time-dependent) nature of diffusion in the extracellular space of WM with increasing diffusion times from 25 to 100 ms (Shemesh and Cohen, 2011).

Here we report the observation of time-dependent diffusion in vivo for relatively long diffusion times, t = 45 – 600 ms, on a standard clinical scanner using STimulated Echo Acquisition Mode (STEAM)-DTI, and discuss the biophysical origin of this phenomenon. STEAM-DTI measurements were performed on 5 healthy volunteers and were calibrated on a gel phantom over the whole time range. Pronounced time-dependence in the longitudinal diffusivity and less pronounced time-dependence in the transverse diffusivity were found in both anatomically based WM regions and in fractional anisotropy (FA) thresholded regions.

The biophysical origin of the observed time-dependence, as discussed below, reflects the non-Gaussian nature of diffusion in at least one tissue compartment (in either direction). In all cases, both longitudinal and transverse diffusivities approach a finite tortuosity limit (i.e. diffusion is not anomalous (Bouchaud and Georges, 1990)), with a slow transient part that is best described by a power-law behavior (Novikov et al., 2014, Burcaw et al., 2015). We argue that the origin of this behavior is likely due to randomly placed (short-range disordered) hindrances and restrictions to diffusion in both parallel and transverse directions. Interestingly, the biological sources of this short-range disorder may be qualitatively distinct: structural disorder along the axons such as, e.g., varicosities for diffusion in the longitudinal direction, and the random packing geometry of fibers within a bundle for diffusion in the transverse direction. This picture is corroborated by the estimated correlation length scales in the range of a few microns in both directions.

Section snippets

In vivo measurements

Diffusion measurements were performed on 5 healthy volunteers (4 males and 1 female) ranging in age from 25 to 41 years old, on a 3 T Siemens Tim Trio (Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a 32-channel head coil and a maximum gradient strength of 40 mT/m during two 1-h scans utilizing the STEAM-DTI sequence as provided by the vendor (WIP 511E). One volunteer was unable to be present for scan 2. Each diffusion sequence acquired b = 0 (5 averages) and b = 500 s/mm2 images along 20 diffusion directions, with

Theory

Our recent framework for revealing mesoscopic structural universality classes via diffusion (Burcaw et al., 2015, Novikov et al., 2014) shows that the disorder class of the structure, represented by the structural exponent p, together with its effective spatial dimensionality d, dictates the functional form of how D(t) approaches its bulk diffusion coefficient, D. The exponent p determines the qualitative long-distance behavior of the density correlation functionΓ(r) of the restrictions to

Results

We ran the scan 1 and 2 STEAM protocols on a gel phantom and the resulting diffusivities with respect to time are shown in Fig. 2, demonstrating no substantial change with time. The values for T1 and T2 of the phantom were measured to be 364.3 ± 34 ms and 63.6 ± 5.6 ms, respectively.

Results from the anatomical WM ROIs for scans 1 and 2 show time-dependence in the longitudinal diffusivity D|| (t) as seen in Fig. 3 for all WM ROIs investigated. The overall decrease in D||(t) in all ROIs is also

Discussion

With this study, we aimed to measure time-dependent diffusion in WM in vivo using clinical PGSE MR methods, and to provide a plausible interpretation of this effect in terms of the cellular length scales. Our results show that for both anatomical and FA-thresholded WM ROIs, a pronounced longitudinal time-dependence and a weaker (in absolute terms) transverse time-dependence of the diffusion coefficient are observed for the 45–600 ms diffusion times measured here using a STEAM sequence in 5

Conclusions

We report here a pronounced longitudinal time-dependence and a weaker (in absolute terms) transverse time-dependence of diffusion tensor eigenvalues in white matter regions observed between 45 ms and 600 ms on a clinical scanner using a STEAM sequence in five healthy volunteers. The observation of time-dependence in both longitudinal and transverse directions is interpreted as an effect of structural disorder at the mesoscopic scale, which is beyond the commonly used physical picture of Gaussian

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Kecheng Liu, Christopher Glielmi and Thorsten Feiweier from Siemens Healthcare for providing support and guidance related to the STEAM acquisition. Research was supported by the Raymond and Beverly Sackler Laboratories for Convergence of Physical, Engineering, and Biomedical Sciences, by the Litwin Foundation for Alzheimer's Research, by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01NS088040 (to E.F.

References (72)

  • H.H. Ong et al.

    Indirect measurement of regional axon diameter in excised mouse spinal cord with q-space imaging: simulation and experimental studies

    NeuroImage

    (2008)
  • J. Stepišnik

    Time-dependent self-diffusion by NMR spin-echo

    Physica B

    (1993)
  • Y. Tang et al.

    A stereological method for estimating the total length and size of myelin fibers in human brain white matter

    J. Neurosci. Methods

    (1997)
  • J. Veraart et al.

    Weighted linear least squares estimation of diffusion MRI parameters: strengths, limitations, and pitfalls

    NeuroImage

    (2013)
  • J. Xu et al.

    Mapping mean axon diameter and axonal volume fraction by MRI using temporal diffusion spectroscopy

    NeuroImage

    (2014)
  • H. Zhang et al.

    Axon diameter mapping in the presence of orientation dispersion with diffusion MRI

    NeuroImage

    (2011)
  • Y. Assaf et al.

    Assignment of the water slow-diffusing component in the central nervous system using q-space diffusion MRS: implications for fiber tract imaging

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2000)
  • Y. Assaf et al.

    New modeling and experimental framework to characterize hindered and restricted water diffusion in brain white matter

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2004)
  • Y. Assaf et al.

    AxCaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2008)
  • D. Barazany et al.

    In vivo measurement of axon diameter distribution in the corpus callosum of rat brain

    Brain

    (2009)
  • C.A. Baron et al.

    Oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE) diffusion tensor imaging of the human brain

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2014)
  • A. Bar-Shir et al.

    High b-value q-space diffusion MRS of nerves: structural information and comparison with histological evidence

    NMR Biomed.

    (2008)
  • P.J. Basser

    Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images

    NMR Biomed.

    (1995)
  • C. Beaulieu

    The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system—a technical review

    NMR Biomed.

    (2002)
  • C. Beaulieu et al.

    An in vitro evaluation of the effects of local magnetic-susceptibility-induced gradients on anisotropic water diffusion in nerve

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1996)
  • T.E.J. Behrens et al.

    Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2003)
  • T.A. Bjarnason et al.

    Characterization of the NMR behavior of white matter in bovine brain

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2005)
  • M.B. Budde et al.

    Neurite beading is sufficient to decrease the apparent diffusion coefficient after ischemic stroke

    PNAS

    (2010)
  • P.T. Callaghan et al.

    Diffraction-like effects in NMR diffusion studies of fluids in porous solids

    Nature

    (1991)
  • C. Clark et al.

    Diffusion time dependence of the apparent diffusion tensor in healthy human brain and white matter disease

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2001)
  • D. Debanne et al.

    Axon physiology

    Physiol. Rev.

    (2011)
  • M.D. Does et al.

    Compartmental study of T1 and T2 in rat brain and trigeminal nerve in vivo

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2002)
  • M.D. Does et al.

    Oscillating gradient measurements of water diffusion in normal and globally ischemic rat brain

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2003)
  • E. Fieremans et al.

    Monte Carlo study of a two-compartment exchange model of diffusion

    NMR Biomed.

    (2010)
  • R.M. Henkelman et al.

    Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1994)
  • M. Horsfield et al.

    Self-diffusion in CNS tissue by volume-selective proton NMR

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (157)

    • In vivo Correlation Tensor MRI reveals microscopic kurtosis in the human brain on a clinical 3T scanner

      2022, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Kurtosis associated with the variance in diffusion tensor magnitudes across the ensemble of all microdomains, thus arising from diffusion tensor size variance, which is referred to as isotropic kurtosis (Kiso; the subscript “iso” here refers to the isotropic part of the tensor (its magnitude), and does not require any of the tensors to have identical eigenvalues). Kurtosis associated with non-Gaussian diffusion effects within restricting “pores” (restricted diffusion, Callaghan et al., 1991), within complex structures in which diffusion effects are not completely coarse grained (Novikov et al., 2014, 2019; Fieremans et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2020a), or a combination of restriction and exchange in exchanging components (Olesen et al., 2022), both of which are referred to as microscopic kurtosis (μK, also previously called intra-compartmental kurtosis, Kintra, in Jespersen et al., 2019; Henriques et al., 2020; Henriques et al., 2021b). Understanding how each of these different sources affect the kurtosis signal can be challenging.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text