Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 54, Issue 1, October 2006, Pages 69-77
Lung Cancer

A randomized, multicenter study to determine the safety and efficacy of the immunoconjugate SGN-15 plus docetaxel for the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.05.020Get rights and content

Summary

Purpose

Chemotherapy prolongs survival and improves quality of life (QOL) for good performance status (PS) patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Targeted therapies may improve chemotherapy effectiveness without worsening toxicity. SGN-15 is an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), consisting of a chimeric murine monoclonal antibody recognizing the Lewis Y (Ley) antigen, conjugated to doxorubicin. Ley is an attractive target since it is expressed by most NSCLC. SGN-15 was active against Ley-positive tumors in early phase clinical trials and was synergistic with docetaxel in preclinical experiments. This Phase II, open-label study was conducted to confirm the activity of SGN-15 plus docetaxel in previously treated NSCLC patients.

Experimental design

Sixty-two patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC expressing Ley, one or two prior chemotherapy regimens, and PS  2 were randomized 2:1 to receive SGN-15 200 mg/m2/week with docetaxel 35 mg/m2/week (Arm A) or docetaxel 35 mg/m2/week alone (Arm B) for 6 of 8 weeks. Intrapatient dose-escalation of SGN-15 to 350 mg/m2 was permitted in the second half of the study. Endpoints were survival, safety, efficacy, and quality of life.

Results

Forty patients on Arm A and 19 on Arm B received at least one treatment. Patients on Arms A and B had median survivals of 31.4 and 25.3 weeks, 12-month survivals of 29% and 24%, and 18-month survivals of 18% and 8%, respectively. Toxicity was mild in both arms. QOL analyses favored Arm A.

Conclusions

SGN-15 plus docetaxel is a well-tolerated and active second and third line treatment for NSCLC patients. Ongoing studies are exploring alternate schedules to maximize synergy between these agents.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death with over one million deaths annually worldwide and over 160,000 deaths in the US in 2004 [1]. Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of lung cancer diagnoses [2]. Most NSCLC patients are diagnosed with advanced stage disease not amenable to surgical cure [3]. Although some stage III patients can be cured with combined modality therapy, most advanced stage patients receive chemotherapy alone resulting in clinical response or disease stabilization in many cases, but with few long-term survivors [4], [5], [6]. Front line treatment with platinum doublet chemotherapy now produces median survivals of 8–11 months and provides clinically meaningful overall survival benefits, with 1 year survivals for stage IV NSCLC patients of 30–50% compared to 5–10% for patients receiving supportive care alone.

Taxanes are among the most active NSCLC chemotherapies acting on cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle by stabilizing microtubules, thus, disrupting normal mitosis and leading to activation of apoptotic pathways in sensitive cells. Both paclitaxel and docetaxel are approved in combination with cisplatin for first line therapy of NSCLC. Docetaxel is also approved as a single agent for patients who have failed first line chemotherapy and is associated with quality of life gains and survival benefits similar to those seen with first line therapy. Patients treated with second line docetaxel have about a 30% chance of living 1 year [7], [8]. In the face of these modest gains, new approaches to systemic therapy of advanced NSCLC are needed.

Anthracyclines have low single agent activity against NSCLC, but doxorubicin was a component of CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin), one of the first chemotherapy regimens to show a survival benefit in this disease [9]. Anthracyclines have been largely supplanted in recent combination chemotherapy regimens in favor of newer agents. However, if effective targeting can increase the specificity of drug delivery and if rational combinations successfully exploit synergistic cell cycle dependent interactions, they may hold greater promise than previously appreciated.

SGN-15 (cBR96-doxorubicin conjugate) is a novel antibody–drug conjugate that targets doxorubicin to tissues expressing the Ley antigen. This carbohydrate antigen is abundantly expressed (>200,000 molecules/cell) by carcinoma cells [10]. Tissue binding studies show that cBR96 targets a wide variety of human carcinomas including lung, breast, colon, prostate, and ovary [10]. cBR96 also targets normal cells expressing Ley, including differentiated epithelial cells of the GI tract and acinar cells of the pancreas. SGN-15 consists of doxorubicin conjugated to cBR96 at a molar ratio of 8:1 with 6 mg doxorubicin per 200 mg SGN-15. Phase I studies of SGN-15 showed evidence of activity in patients with Ley expressing tumors [11]. Of 58 evaluable patients, 21 (36%) had stable disease after 6 weeks and there were two partial responses.

SGN-15 and docetaxel are synergistic in preclinical studies. Following exposure to doxorubicin, cells arrest in G2 [12] and are then sensitized to G2/M acting drugs such as taxanes. In vitro studies [13] and animal models [14] confirm that the combination of SGN-15 plus a taxane is more effective than either drug alone in several tumor types. Phases I and II studies in subjects with epithelial malignancies, including metastatic breast and colorectal carcinomas, confirm that the combination of SGN-15 and docetaxel is safe and clinically active [15], [16], [17], [18] (unpublished data, Seattle Genetics, Inc.). In 29 evaluable patients with breast cancer, the disease control rate (i.e. stable disease or better) was 41% (seven stable disease [SD], two minimal response [MR], three partial response [PR]). Among 20 evaluable patients with colorectal carcinoma, the disease control rate was 20% (three SD, one MR). The toxicity profile was acceptable with gastrointestinal toxicities occurring most frequently. Other toxicities were mild and infrequent.

We now report the results of a randomized Phase II, multicenter study designed to determine the safety and efficacy of SGN-15 and docetaxel in patients with NSCLC.

Section snippets

Patients

Patients with recurrent or progressive advanced non-small cell lung cancer not amenable to therapy with curative intent were eligible for this trial if they had failed at least one but not more than two prior chemotherapy regimens at least one of which must have contained a platinum. Patients must have been at least 4 weeks past prior treatment with recovery from significant toxicities. Measurable or evaluable disease, ECOG performance status (PS)  2, age at least 18 years, and life expectancy

Results

Sixty-two subjects were enrolled at 11 sites between August 2001 and April 2003. Three patients did not receive study treatment: one patient in Arm A had a decline in PS prior to treatment and was removed from the study and two patients in Arm B withdrew consent prior to treatment. Fifty-nine patients, 40 in Arm A and 19 in Arm B, received at least one dose of study medication and were evaluated for survival and toxicity. The median number of weeks on study treatment was 8.2 in Arm A and 8.1 in

Discussion and conclusion

This randomized Phase II study shows that the combination of SGN-15 and docetaxel is active in NSCLC patients who have failed up to two chemotherapy regimens including at least one platinum-containing regimen. The study treatment was well tolerated without a clinically meaningful difference in toxicity of the combination arm compared to weekly docetaxel alone. Patients on the combination arm had a longer median survival (31.4 weeks versus 25.3 weeks) and a better chance of living 18 months (18%

Conflict of interest

All authors, with the exception of those employed by Seattle Genetics, have indicated no potential conflicts of interest. The employees of or contractors to Seattle Genetics include Laurie Grove, Michael Thorn, Dennis Miller, and Jonathan Drachman.

Acknowledgements

Sincere thanks are extended to Michael MacDonald, MD, Amy Sing, MD, Andrew Sandier, MD, J. Michael White, PhD, Jennie Lorenz, CCRA, Katie Herz, CRA, Brenda Fisher, RN, Esther Bit-Ivan, Livia Szeto, RN, Cara O’Keefe, Joanne Jelliffe, Christine Baker, RN, Heather Houston, RN, Cheryl Elzinga, Inger Thompson, Carol Ford, RN, Diane Perry, RN, and all of the clinical trial site personnel for their assistance in conducting this trial. We are grateful to Stephanie Boyer for her invaluable assistance in

References (25)

  • D.T. Milton et al.

    Advances in cytotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

    Semin Oncol

    (2005)
  • D.F. Cella et al.

    Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument

    Lung Cancer

    (1995)
  • M.C. Bissery

    Preclinical pharmacology of docetaxel

    Eur J Cancer

    (1995)
  • Cancer facts and figures

    (2004)
  • S.H. Landis et al.

    Cancer statistics 1999

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (1999)
  • R.J. Ginsberg

    Continuing controversies in staging NSCLC: an analysis of the revised 1997 staging system

    Oncology (Williston Park)

    (1998)
  • D.R. Gandara et al.

    Consolidation docetaxel after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: phase II Southwest Oncology Group Study S9504

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • J.H. Schiller et al.

    Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • F.V. Fossella et al.

    Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (2000)
  • F.A. Shepherd et al.

    Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

    J Clin Oncol

    (2000)
  • J.A. Knost et al.

    Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

    Cancer Treat Rep

    (1981)
  • I. Hellstrom et al.

    Highly tumor-reactive, internalizing, mouse monoclonal antibodies to Le(y)-related cell surface antigens

    Cancer Res

    (1990)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Glycan Arrays: Construction, Detection, and Analysis

      2021, Comprehensive Glycoscience: Second Edition
    • Immunoconjugates as immune canoes to kill breast cancer cells

      2020, Immunotherapy in Resistant Cancer: From the Lab Bench Work to Its Clinical Perspectives
    • Antibody drug conjugates in thoracic malignancies

      2018, Lung Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      The ORR was 6% with SGN-15 + docetaxel and 21% with docetaxel. Survival was numerically greater in the experimental arm (mPFS 10.9 weeks and mOS 31.4 weeks) when compared to docetaxel alone (mPFS 7 weeks and mOS 25.3 weeks) [43]. PF-7020 is an ADC, with an auristatin cytotoxic attached to the antibody via a cleavable linker, which targets protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7).

    • Investigational Antibody–Drug Conjugates for Treatment of B-lineage Malignancies

      2018, Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
      Citation Excerpt :

      ADCs developed in the 1970s through the 1990s generally provided disappointing clinical results.12 The payloads were commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs such as 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin, which most likely lacked sufficient potency.13 Other problems included the selection of appropriate antigens, the use of murine antibodies, and inadequate linker stability.

    • Structural biology of antibody recognition of carbohydrate epitopes and potential uses for targeted cancer immunotherapies

      2015, Molecular Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patients receiving SGN-15 and docetaxel showed modest increases in survival (29% and 18% at 12 and 18 months) compared to those treated with docetaxel alone (18% and 8% at 12 and 18 months). Only mild-treatment related side effects were noted in both study arms (Ross et al., 2006). Early Phase I clinical trials with hu3S193 in patients with advanced colorectal, lung and ovarian cancer have shown promising safety and in vivo tumor targeting properties with minimal binding to normal tissues (Krug et al., 2007; Scott et al., 2007).

    • A new system for targeted delivery of doxorubicin into tumor cells

      2013, Journal of Controlled Release
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most effective delivery systems are those comprising vector molecules that can selectively bind to specific receptors on the surface of tumor cells and can be internalized by cells, with the internalization of drug. Serum albumin [1], transferrin [2], folic acid [3], and chimeric or humanized monoclonal antibodies to tumor cell surface antigens [4,5] are most often used as vectors. In our opinion, using the oncofetal alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) receptor as a target is a promising approach.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: ZymoGenetics, Inc., 1201 Eastlake Avenue East, Seattle, WA 98102-3702, United States.

    2

    Present address: The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Cancer Research Building I, Room 344, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States.

    View full text