Clinical Study
Percutaneous Lymphatic Embolization as Primary Management of Pelvic and Retroperitoneal Iatrogenic Lymphoceles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2021.07.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of lymphatic embolization (LE) in decreasing catheter output and dwell time in iatrogenic lymphoceles after percutaneous catheter drainage.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective review of patients who underwent intranodal lymphangiography (INL) with or without LE for management of iatrogenic lymphoceles between January 2017 and November 2020 was performed. Twenty consecutive patients (16 men and 4 women; median age, 60.5 years) underwent a total of 22 INLs and 18 LEs for 15 pelvic and 5 retroperitoneal lymphoceles. Lymphatic leaks were identified in 19/22 (86.4%) of the INLs. Three patients underwent INL only because a leak was not identified or was identified into an asymptomatic lymphocele. One patient underwent repeat INL and LE after persistent high catheter output, and 1 patient underwent repeat INL with LE after the initial INL did not identify a leak. Catheter output was assessed until catheter removal, and changes in output before and after the procedure were reported. The patients were followed up for 2–30 months, and procedural complications were reported.

Results

The median catheter output before the procedure was 210 mL/day (50–1,200 mL/day), which decreased to a median of 20 mL/day (0–520 mL/day) 3 days after the procedure, with a median output decrease of 160 mL (0–900 mL). The median time between INL with LE and catheter removal was 6 days, with no recurrence requiring redrainage. Four patients experienced minor complications of low-grade fever (n = 2) and lower limb edema (n = 2).

Conclusions

Lymphangiogram and LE are safe and effective methods for the management of lymphoceles.

Section snippets

Patient Population and Lymphocele Characteristics

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (approval number: 16-402). Review of medical records identified 20 consecutive patients (16 men and 4 women) with a median age of 60.5 years (39–73 years) who underwent a total of 22 intranodal lymphangiography (INL) procedures and 18 LE procedures for the management of 15 pelvic and 5 retroperitoneal iatrogenic lymphoceles following percutaneous drainage catheter placement from

Lymphangiogram Findings and Initial Management

The median time between the original surgery and lymphatic intervention was 36 days (14–180 days). The median time between percutaneous drainage and lymphatic intervention was 9.5 days (0–38 days). Three patients underwent same-session percutaneous drainage and lymphatic intervention after a discussion with the referring urologist. The median catheter output before the procedure was 210 mL/day (50–1,200 mL/day). Two patients underwent only INL because a leak was not identified. One patient

Discussion

LND is an important part of surgical treatment for several malignancies (15,16). With its proven superiority in staging compared with imaging, along with a potential survival benefit incurred with an extended LND compared with the standard LND, LND is an integral part of surgical oncology (15,17). Since an increasing number of patients are undergoing LND and since the extent of LND is expected to increase, more patients are expected to experience symptomatic lymphoceles (18,19).

Sclerotherapy is

References (26)

  • M.S. Keskin et al.

    The incidence and sequela of lymphocele formation after robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection

    BJU Int

    (2016)
  • I. Tsaur et al.

    Risk factors, complications and management of lymphocele formation after radical prostatectomy: a mini-review

    Int J Urol

    (2019)
  • J.K. Kim et al.

    Postoperative pelvic lymphocele: treatment with simple percutaneous catheter drainage

    Radiology

    (1999)
  • Cited by (11)

    • The Sonographic Detection of an Obstructive Pelvic Lymphocele

      2024, Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.

    This research was funded in part by the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

    View full text