Elsevier

Environmental Pollution

Volume 182, November 2013, Pages 141-149
Environmental Pollution

Behavior of Ag nanoparticles in soil: Effects of particle surface coating, aging and sewage sludge amendment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.027Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Silver nanoparticle coating affects fate in unamended soils.

  • Citrated coated silver nanoparticles could be found in pore water for up to six months.

  • Pre-incubation of silver nanoparticles in sewage sludge negated effects of surface coating.

  • Weathered or reprecipitated particles found in pore water for up to two months in sludge amended soils.

  • Particle surface coating, sewage sludge amendment and aging all have important impacts.

Abstract

This study addressed the relative importance of particle coating, sewage sludge amendment, and aging on aggregation and dissolution of manufactured Ag nanoparticles (Ag MNPs) in soil pore water. Ag MNPs with citrate (CIT) or polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) coatings were incubated with soil or municipal sewage sludge which was then amended to soil (1% or 3% sludge (w/w)). Pore waters were extracted after 1 week and 2 and 6 months and analyzed for chemical speciation, aggregation state and dissolution. Ag MNP coating had profound effects on aggregation state and partitioning to pore water in the absence of sewage sludge, but pre-incubation with sewage sludge negated these effects. This suggests that Ag MNP coating does not need to be taken into account to understand fate of AgMNPs applied to soil through biosolids amendment. Aging of soil also had profound effects that depended on Ag MNP coating and sludge amendment.

Introduction

The growth of nanotechnology has raised public concern about potential environmental and human health effects of manufactured nanoparticles (MNPs) released to the environment (Helland et al., 2006, Wiesner et al., 2006). Production of consumer products containing MNPs continues to increase despite the lack of sufficient knowledge concerning how they may affect the environment (Luoma, 2008, Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, 2008). The lack of detection and in situ characterization capabilities for nanomaterials in complex biological and environmental matrices also hinders the development of regulations for MNPs in the environment (von der Kammer et al., 2012, Weinberg et al., 2011). One major class of MNPs currently being used is Ag MNPs, due to their antimicrobial properties (Levard et al., 2012). Ag MNP containing products, such as paint and textiles have already been shown to release Ag MNPs through normal use (Benn and Westerhoff, 2008, Kaegi et al., 2010).

In some instances particles may directly enter terrestrial environments as they are shed from Ag MNP containing products such as paints (Kaegi et al., 2010). However, a large fraction of Ag MNPs are predicted to enter wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) via sewage streams where they are likely to efficiently partition to the sewage sludge and be sulfidized (Gottschalk et al., 2009, Kaegi et al., 2011, Kim et al., 2012, Lombi et al., 2013). In the United States and elsewhere, the majority (about 60% in the US) of sewage sludge is applied to agricultural lands as biosolids (EPA, 1995). Because of this, we expect agricultural soils to be a major repository for MNPs and a source of Ag MNPs to aquatic environments through erosion and runoff. It has been shown that aggregation and dissolution behavior of Ag MNPs can have important implications for environmental fate and toxicity (Bone et al., 2012, Unrine et al., 2012).

Ag MNP behavior in soil has not been widely investigated (Coutris et al., 2012, Sagee et al., 2012), in part due to difficulties associated with tracking MNPs in the complex soil matrix (Blaser et al., 2007, Kaegi et al., 2011). Conclusions drawn from aquatic studies may have limited relevance to terrestrial systems. Behavior of MNPs in soil may differ from aquatic systems due to the unique biological, physical and chemical characteristics of soil that differ from aqueous systems. These characteristics vary widely among soil types and through time and space. For example, aggregation of the particles onto the solid phase of the soil is a complicating factor that cannot be taken into account in simple aqueous studies. To our knowledge, few previous studies have been published that attempt to characterize Ag MNP aggregation and dissolution behavior in soil pore water. A recent study investigated Ag MNP dissolution in soil (Cornelis et al., 2012); however, this study did not investigate the role of particle coating, aging or sludge amendment.

Changes in Ag MNP behavior due to modification by the manufacturer (e.g., surface coating) or transformations in the environment via contact with naturally occurring minerals or organic matter (NOM), as well as other ligands such as sulfide or chloride further increases difficulties associated with assessing the risk of MNPs to human health and the environment. Differences in surface coating alone can affect Ag MNP aggregation and dissolution behavior under differing environmental conditions (Bone et al., 2012, El Badawy et al., 2010, Kittler et al., 2010, MacCuspie, 2011, Unrine et al., 2012). Likewise, environmental constituents such as NOM have been shown to promote particle stability for both MNPs and naturally occurring particles (King and Jarvie, 2012), in some cases by coating the particle surface (Bertsch and Seaman, 1999, Fabrega et al., 2009, Hotze et al., 2010, Zhang et al., 2009). In wastewater treatment plants, Ag MNPs are sulfidized which significantly reduces Ag solubility and results in decreased toxicity (Hirsch, 1998, Kaegi et al., 2011, Kim et al., 2010, Ratte, 1999, Reinsch et al., 2012). However, little is known of Ag MNP behavior following application of sewage sludge to agricultural soils including the influence of sulfidation and surface coating.

The objective of this study was to determine the aggregation and dissolution behavior of Ag MNPs in soil pore water as a function of surface chemistry, sewage sludge biosolids pre-incubation and amendment rate as well as soil aging time. To observe effects of Ag MNP surface coating and biosolids pre-incubation, we aged soils containing Ag MNPs having different surface coatings and under controlled laboratory conditions with various incubation times between 1 week and 6 months. The Ag MNPs were introduced to the soil either directly or through amendment of sewage sludge containing the Ag MNPs which were pre-incubated for 1 week. Previous studies have shown rapid transformation (within minutes) of AgNPs both when incubated with processed biosolids (Colman et al., 2013) or in pilot wastewater treatment plants (Lombi et al., 2013). We expected differences in surface coating to result in dissimilar Ag MNP behavior, with sterically stabilized polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) Ag MNPs being more stable against aggregation than the low molecular weight organic acid (citrate, CIT) coated particles which would be subject to removal of coating through desorption as well as screening of surface charge by divalent cations in soil solution. Further, we expected sulfidation to negate the effects of manufactured coating (Levard et al., 2011, Lombi et al., 2013) within pore waters and aging to yield a decline in pore water Ag because of the very low solubility of Ag2S. We adapted techniques developed and used in our previous research to track the chemical and physical changes of Ag MNPs in the soils including asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) (Unrine et al., 2012) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (EXAFS) (Shoults-Wilson et al., 2011a, Shoults-Wilson et al., 2011b, Unrine et al., 2012). We extracted pore water from soils and analyzed them using AF4 coupled to static/dynamic multi-angle laser light scattering (MALLS/DLS) and an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) to assess Ag particle size distribution. Ultracentrifugation followed by ICP-MS analysis was also used to assess the proportion of dissolved Ag in pore waters. EXAFS of soil solids and transmission electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (TEM-EDS) of AF4 fractions were used to examine chemical speciation and physical form of Ag in soils and soil pore water, respectively.

Section snippets

Silver nanoparticles synthesis and characterization

Two types of Ag MNPs were used having differing surface coatings. First, 60 nm nominal diameter polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) Ag MNPs were synthesized as previously described (Cheng et al., 2011). We also used 60 nm nominal diameter citrate (CIT) coated Ag MNPs made via reduction of AgNO3 by boiling in sodium citrate (Turkevich et al., 1951). Primary particle size and shape was examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a Jeol 2010 F field emission gun electron microscope (Tokyo,

Initial particle characterization

The intensity weighted (Z-average) hydrodynamic diameters of the PVP-Ag MNPs and CIT-Ag MNPs in 18 MΩ DI water were 84.4 ± 0.5 and 51.4 ± 0.1, respectively. Zeta potentials of PVP-Ag MNPs and CIT-Ag MNPs were −24.7 ± 14.4 mV and −101.0 ± 17 mV (Hückel approximation) at pH 6.0 in DI water, respectively. The primary particle size of PVP and CIT-Ag MNPs determined by TEM were 53 ± 14 and 84 ± 24 (errors represent standard deviation of the particle size distribution) for PVP-Ag MNPs and CIT-Ag

Discussion

Surface coating was demonstrated to influence Ag MNP colloidal stability in pore water extracted from soil for up to six months in the absence of sewage sludge. Initially, relatively high concentrations of intact CIT-Ag MNPs were observed in pore water while PVP-Ag MNPs were present at very low concentrations and likely bound to solid phases in the soil. This finding is in agreement with another study which observed PVP-Ag MNPs to have a high affinity for soil solids in a sandy loam soil (

Conclusion

Silver form (Ag ion versus MNP), MNP coating, aging and contact with sewage sludge all have profound effects on Ag behavior in soil pore water. In unamended soils Ag MNP coating has clear effects on partitioning to pore water, but not after contact with sewage sludge. During the first few months after amendment with sewage sludge, the chemical speciation was similar regardless of Ag source (nanoparticles versus ions), but the physical form of the Ag compounds (particles suspended in pore water

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and National Science Foundation (NSF) through cooperative agreements CR-83515701 (Office of Research and Development) and EF-0830093 (Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology) and through the EPA Science to Achieve Results (STAR) program (RD-83485701 and RD-83457401 ). It has not been formally reviewed by EPA or NSF. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the authors. EPA

References (50)

  • S. Blaser et al.

    Estimation of cumulative aquatic exposure and risk due to silver: contribution of nano-functionalized plastics and textiles

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2007)
  • A.J. Bone et al.

    Biotic and abiotic interactions in aquatic microcosms determine fate and toxicity of Ag nanoparticles: part 2-Toxicity and Ag speciation

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2012)
  • Y. Cheng et al.

    Toxicity reduction of polymer-stabilized silver nanoparticles by sunlight

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2011)
  • B.P. Colman et al.

    Low concentrations of silver nanoparticles in biosolids cause adverse ecosystem responses under realistic field scenario

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • G. Cornelis et al.

    Retention and dissolution of engineered silver nanoparticles in natural soils

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (2012)
  • A. El Badawy et al.

    State of the Science Literature Review: Everything Nanosilver and More

    (2010)
  • EPA

    A Guide to the Biosolids Risk Assessments for the EPA Part 503 Rule

    (1995)
  • EPA

    Method 3052: Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Siliceous and Organically Based Matrices

    (1996)
  • EPA

    Method 6020: Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

    (1998)
  • EPA

    Biosolids Technology Fact Sheet: Land Application of Biosolids

    (2000)
  • J. Fabrega et al.

    Silver nanoparticle impact on bacterial growth: effect of pH, concentration, and organic matter

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2009)
  • P. Fedotov et al.

    Fractionation and characterization of nano- and microparticles in liquid media

    Anal Bioanal. Chem.

    (2011)
  • F. Gottschalk et al.

    Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2009)
  • A. Helland et al.

    Nanoparticulate materials and regulatory policy in Europe: an analysis of stakeholder perspectives

    J. Nanopart Res.

    (2006)
  • M.P. Hirsch

    Availability of sludge-borne silver to agricultural crops

    Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (125)

    • Microbial nanoproducts in “waste compost”: a “quality-check” for sustainable “solid-waste management”

      2022, Environmental Applications of Microbial Nanotechnology: Emerging Trends in Environmental Remediation
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text